
Originally Posted by
lepistoir
That's not an argument. You don't ski much on rose but your solidarity is needed and is an investment for the future. Your South Lake access and OSV conflicts will come along soon enough. Speaking of which, there is a Tahoe Backcountry Alliance meeting and greeting Wed, 6:30-8:30, at Alpenglow in Tahoe City. See you there.
I ski in the Rose area quite a lot, actually, but I don't ski on ILP because I don't like to cross tracks and I'm willing to walk for 45 minutes to avoid having to do so. ILP is a junk show like Powderhouse & Jakes, and when signing up for skiing those places one must simply accept that.
You won't get any satisfaction asking me for solidarity when your argument is that motorized recreation is an invalid form of public lands use. You know that I own 4 off road motorcycles, yes? I wish that sleds and motos were quieter, and will be really happy when a legit electric dirtbike comes along, but the reality is that driving from the Bay Area to ski on lifts powered by electricity produces at least as much carbon as driving from Reno and riding a sled for a few hours. How about you rail against lift-served skiing? Oh, you do a lot of that...nevermind.
We're all fucking the planet from both ends, and only massive structural change will slow it down. They sold us a lie in the past couple of decades that we could save the planet with virtuous individual choices, but all that did was cause infighting like this and take the focus away from the real issues.
I'm going to skip the meeting at Alpenglow, which is a 90 minute drive from my house. Kidwoo can use the carbon I've saved for some high marking.
ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.
Bookmarks