Check Out Our Shop
Page 28 of 54 FirstFirst ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... LastLast
Results 676 to 700 of 1348

Thread: Praxis Lhasa Pows?

  1. #676
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,027
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    Total package bruh. Strong core, strong upper body and strong lower body.
    This and technique. Just because someone is big doesn't mean that they know how to drive a ski.

  2. #677
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Kopi_Red View Post
    This and technique. Just because someone is big doesn't mean that they know how to drive a ski.
    Exactly! You also need finesse balance and ability.

  3. #678
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    I was being serious. I really wanna know, because some bigger people havent liked praxis heavy 5. Trying to help you, i cant compare to supergoats


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I sent you a pm about this. Wanted this discussion off here.

  4. #679
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Planky overstiff skis suck and are too much work. Why make these require manballs work to ski? They'll be worse in pow, too.

    Get the 3/4 flex maybe?

    By mid season, if you've been touring as frequently as you say you want to, and haven't died, you'll weigh 30 lbs less and won't want to manhandle the stiffs, despite being just as strong (per weight).

  5. #680
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Quote Originally Posted by pfluffenmeister View Post
    Which core?
    Adding carbon or veneer on the non-protos?
    What layup do you think will feel most similar to the OG Lhasa Fat Hybrid?
    I have a terrible 'I'll ski anything' attitude, so I am not going into detail on particulars, and I mean in my mind. I'm more likely to tell Keith just make them and I'm good with that. If I was choosing for me, the 3/4 will be the one I'm sure I'll like better. And I won't care what core or top it has. This ski works in all iterations. I, personally, don't need an I beam ski. I like to feel a little bit of flex.

    Thing is - the body of the ski in 3/4 is stiff, like your pair, based on the proto. The nose will flex a little, just like yours, I'm sure. I like that flex.
    To feel the core flex, slip your foot under the tail, grab the ski below the nose where the sidewall ends, then flex it. That's body flex.

  6. #681
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Planky overstiff skis suck and are too much work. Why make these require manballs work to ski? They'll be worse in pow, too.

    Get the 3/4 flex maybe?

    By mid season, if you've been touring as frequently as you say you want to, and haven't died, you'll weigh 30 lbs less and won't want to manhandle the stiffs, despite being just as strong (per weight).
    What's planky and stiff to one person may not be to another. If I was stepping of a chopper in dream time conditions, I would personally want my proto Mavens. They truly are overstuff, but are fuckin magic in straight up powder

  7. #682
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Yeah, but these aren't big mountain boards, nor for pure pow...they don't have the dims.

    They're an edgier BillyGoat. They need to flex a little to float and turn and be playful and poppy.

  8. #683
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Point taken, but still don't agree stiff would make them worse in pow.
    Playful N poppy is not a bad thing tho

  9. #684
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Well I'm not saying "soft" either.

    Stiff is good, but too stiff sux and is too much work. And too stiff for the geometry undoes the thoughtful design intent.

  10. #685
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Also, I think this is more of a terrain crusher shape myself.

  11. #686
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    I hear you man, that's my point behind stiff might not be stiff for the next dude. As long as it doesn't transmit shit snow should be the goal.

  12. #687
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Yup, we're tracking.

  13. #688
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bay Area / Tahoe
    Posts
    2,801
    Lacewood veneer will probably be an option for these:




  14. #689
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    Yeah, but these aren't big mountain boards, nor for pure pow...they don't have the dims.

    They're an edgier BillyGoat. They need to flex a little to float and turn and be playful and poppy.
    So I'm waiting on a hopeful release of 187s and this comment interests me.

    Earlier in this thread, someone (splat?) posted that the Lhasa's profile was very GPO-like.

    I'd love a GPO-like ski that approaches the crap snow performance of a Goat. Is this the ski?

    I'm pretty much done with asym, even if I finally figure out the Qs.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  15. #690
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whitefish
    Posts
    1,249
    Has anyone skied the OG Lhasa Fat and GPOs and can offer any comparison?

  16. #691
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Quote Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un View Post
    So I'm waiting on a hopeful release of 187s and this comment interests me.

    Earlier in this thread, someone (splat?) posted that the Lhasa's profile was very GPO-like.
    ... Thom
    The 187s will likely not happen.

    Let me clarify - the GPO is very much like the 191 Lhasa in terms of tip and tail rocker; or vice versa, if you like.

  17. #692
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by splat View Post
    The 187s will likely not happen.

    Let me clarify - the GPO is very much like the 191 Lhasa in terms of tip and tail rocker; or vice versa, if you like.
    Yeah, I thought it overly optimistic that a TGR thread could generate enough interest for a second run ... and in such a "short" length for maggots ;-)

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 10-12-2018 at 12:59 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  18. #693
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    And too stiff for the geometry undoes the thoughtful design intent.
    Tuning the flex to other characteristics a ski manifests can maximize interacting material influences and is a definite factor in optimals.

  19. #694
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bay Area / Tahoe
    Posts
    2,801
    Only 2 days left to order... not a ski you want to miss out on [emoji108]

  20. #695
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    Praxis Lhasa Pows?

    Dammmmmnit

    Is there a Lhasa Scholarship?

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #696
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    394
    it’s called visa.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  22. #697
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Quote Originally Posted by theetruscan View Post
    it’s called visa.
    And visa gives you a payment plan just like Phoenix University.

  23. #698
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whitefish
    Posts
    1,249
    Splat I can’t wait to be on another pair your skis by way of Keith!

  24. #699
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Yeah, Kevino! I want to see some of those outandish pics you do.

  25. #700
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Dammmmmnit

    Is there a Lhasa Scholarship?

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Only for Bloski

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •