Check Out Our Shop
Page 32 of 182 FirstFirst ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... LastLast
Results 776 to 800 of 4527

Thread: New Season, New Tires, New Thread

  1. #776
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,117
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    I’d go with the 2.3s. On my 26 mm Arch MK3, the 2.5 DHF was workable but looked a bit balloon-like. The Minions, even in 2.3, should be a good step up grip-wise from the Rapid Robs.
    I lean that way for the same reason, but since it's her bike and she wants to look down at something silly wide that becomes a problem.

    Did yours roll over too easy or have any functional issues besides the look?

  2. #777
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    I put 2.5 Minion WTs on wife's 26mm ID E13 rims. She loves them. They're on a Chromag Surface 29er

  3. #778
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vernon BC
    Posts
    1,765
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    I'm looking at putting a set of Maxxis' WT tires on my wife's 29er, which is sporting 21 mm rims. I ran a DHF in (old) 2.5" width on rims of about that width on my old 26" bike with good results, but what's up with being "optimized for 35 mm rim widths?" Is WT too wide to work on a 21 mm rim? Is she gonna die?

    She wants to go wider than her worn out 2.25 Rapid Robs, which seems a solid move. Considering 2.5 DHF/2.4 DHR2 vs. 2.3's which don't seem like a minimal step up (she's going to be looking down at that front tire; apparently this is a major factor). TIA
    WT tires are designed to fit 30-35mm rims. For a 21mm rim, you just need a regular tire profile. You should be able to find a Minion in 29x2.5 that doesn't have the WT designation (No?)

    Edit .. after a quick look, maybe not.

    A WT tire on an rim less than 30mm is going to change the shape of the tread profile, in that it will require a greater lean to engage the side knobs
    "Its not the arrow, its the Indian" - M.Pinto

  4. #779
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,271
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    <snip>
    She wants to go wider than her worn out 2.25 Rapid Robs
    Almost anything will be a step up from those worn out crap-tires.

  5. #780
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vernon BC
    Posts
    1,765
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Almost anything will be a step up from those worn out crap-tires.
    Jeepers, no kidding. I just looked at that tread pattern.

    Just get a minion in a 2.3, it will be night and day. It will be lighter than a 2.5 and have less rolling resistance. Win.
    "Its not the arrow, its the Indian" - M.Pinto

  6. #781
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,933
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    I'm looking at putting a set of Maxxis' WT tires on my wife's 29er, which is sporting 21 mm rims. I ran a DHF in (old) 2.5" width on rims of about that width on my old 26" bike with good results, but what's up with being "optimized for 35 mm rim widths?" Is WT too wide to work on a 21 mm rim? Is she gonna die?

    She wants to go wider than her worn out 2.25 Rapid Robs, which seems a solid move. Considering 2.5 DHF/2.4 DHR2 vs. 2.3's which don't seem like a minimal step up (she's going to be looking down at that front tire; apparently this is a major factor). TIA
    Going from a relatively narrow, relatively low knobbed tire to one of the biggest, knobbiest tires on the market seems like overkill. There are probably better options that will give her the balloon-ish visual that she wants but will fit a 21mm rim better and probably weigh less and roll faster than a DHF. I'm making some assumptions about how aggressively your wife is riding here, but jumping all the way over to the DH end of the tire spectrum might be unnecessary, and for a bigger tire on a narrower rim, a tire with some transitional knobs might ride better (especially for a less aggressive rider). Big tire + narrow rim = rounded tire profile, so it can be hard for someone who isn't leaning the bike way over to engage the side knobs (but some transitional knobs will pick up the slack, to some extent). So maybe a 2.4" Ardent, or a 2.4" WTB Trail Boss would work well, or a 2.35" Nobby Nic.

  7. #782
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,117
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Almost anything will be a step up from those worn out crap-tires.
    True. But she's had time on a number of bikes wearing DHF, DHR2, HR2 and Aggressors in the last few years, so it's not just a comparison to crap. She Hates the RR's and for the way she's riding lately I can see her benefiting from a lot more tread.

    I'd take Lee's comment and run with it, but her wheels are Turbines with 21 mm ID, so it's kind of extreme. Wish I could find some non-WT's.

    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Going from a relatively narrow, relatively low knobbed tire to one of the biggest, knobbiest tires on the market seems like overkill. There are probably better options that will give her the balloon-ish visual that she wants but will fit a 21mm rim better and probably weigh less and roll faster than a DHF. I'm making some assumptions about how aggressively your wife is riding here, but jumping all the way over to the DH end of the tire spectrum might be unnecessary, and for a bigger tire on a narrower rim, a tire with some transitional knobs might ride better (especially for a less aggressive rider). Big tire + narrow rim = rounded tire profile, so it can be hard for someone who isn't leaning the bike way over to engage the side knobs (but some transitional knobs will pick up the slack, to some extent). So maybe a 2.4" Ardent, or a 2.4" WTB Trail Boss would work well, or a 2.35" Nobby Nic.
    I've given some thought to the transition knobs, too, as she's not as accustomed to leaning the tires hard. OTOH, her only tread left just now is on the shoulders, so she's getting a Little practice! Interesting thought on the Trail Boss. I have that in the rear and it definitely likes to lean, too, but the transition is less abrupt than a DHF (or the Convict).

  8. #783
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,117
    So what's the story with the Ardent? Maxxis says it is more hard pack oriented but otherwise has higher rolling resistance and lower "cornering control" than several of their other tires: DHF, DHR2, Rekon, Griffin, and Forekaster, at least. Is there more to that? What gives?

  9. #784
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Fwiw I kind of agree with others that 21mm ID is pretty narrow for WT tires.

    I'll try to remember to get a shot of the WTs on the 26mm ID rims (they look "normal")

    Wife wanted a bit more compliance for the hardtail which is why she got the 2.5 Minions. On another bike (Firebird dual sus) with 30mm ID rims she has 2.5 and 2.4 non WT Maxxis and is perfectly happy with that

  10. #785
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    7,536
    I really like my ride after moving aggressor to rear and minion DHF to front. Both are 29x2.5 and it handles well and grips good and seems to climb pretty well. Now if I can just build up cardio.
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    So after 15 years we finally made it to Utah.....


    Thanks BCSAR and POWMOW Ski Patrol for rescues

    8, 17, 13, 18, 16, 18, 20, 19, 16, 24, 32, 35

    2021/2022 (13/15)

  11. #786
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,430
    I have Enve XC rims on my Tallboy. They are 19mm IW. I'm running a 2.5 DHF on the front and either a 2.3 Aggressor or Minion SS on the rear. I went from having a ~2.3 Ardent front, ~2.3 Ardent Race rear and the difference was night and day for me. The DHF/Aggressor/Minion SS are WAY more confidence inspiring and as a result, more fun to ride. Probably not the fastest rolling tires out there, but they are sure are fun.

    The 2.5 DHF is the DC version - maybe it rolls a little faster...

    Seth

  12. #787
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,126
    Looking to put a nobby nic 2.6 on a carbon rim, 26mm inside width, 30mm out side. Thoughts if this is wide enough?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  13. #788
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,430
    Quote Originally Posted by detrusor View Post
    Looking to put a nobby nic 2.6 on a carbon rim, 26mm inside width, 30mm out side. Thoughts if this is wide enough?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Is there a recommendation from the rim manufacturer? I have a small ID, but Enve states that they will work fine up to 2.5s.

    Seth

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using TGR Forums mobile app

  14. #789
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Faster rolling, but a good bit less cornering and braking traction than the DHF.
    So maybe enough cornering and braking for a smaller rider that isn't pushing redline all over the place?

  15. #790
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,271
    Quote Originally Posted by ticketchecker View Post
    So maybe enough cornering and braking for a smaller rider that isn't pushing redline all over the place?
    Probably.

    But it sure won't help them progress to a rider that *does* redline it all over the place.


  16. #791
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,347

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Probably.

    But it sure won't help them progress to a rider that *does* redline it all over the place.

    Yeah, at 54yo I'm happy with my JRA all over the place

  17. #792
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,117
    Quote Originally Posted by ticketchecker View Post
    So maybe enough cornering and braking for a smaller rider that isn't pushing redline all over the place?
    How much traction is enough can be dependant on the rider's goals more than anything. For someone that isn't pushing the limits constantly but can feel little traction losses (even subconsciously) more traction equals more confidence. (Not to dissuade you, it's a compromise anyway, of course.)

  18. #793
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,271
    Quote Originally Posted by ticketchecker View Post
    Yeah, at 54yo I'm happy with my JRA all over the place
    May as well just run slicks. Really good rolling resistance on those.


  19. #794
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    May as well just run slicks. Really good rolling resistance on those.

    Right, now get off my lawn

  20. #795
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,271
    Quote Originally Posted by ticketchecker View Post
    Right, now get off my lawn
    Wait. That's my line...

  21. #796
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    725
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    I'm looking at putting a set of Maxxis' WT tires on my wife's 29er, which is sporting 21 mm rims. I ran a DHF in (old) 2.5" width on rims of about that width on my old 26" bike with good results, but what's up with being "optimized for 35 mm rim widths?" Is WT too wide to work on a 21 mm rim? Is she gonna die?

    She wants to go wider than her worn out 2.25 Rapid Robs, which seems a solid move. Considering 2.5 DHF/2.4 DHR2 vs. 2.3's which don't seem like a minimal step up (she's going to be looking down at that front tire; apparently this is a major factor). TIA
    I'd strongly recommend a 29x2.3 DHR2 EXO/3C/TR front, and a 29x2.3 Minion SS rear, set up tubeless. Works well with that rim width, very little or no weight gain, MUCH MUCH more traction, still very good low rolling resistance. Excellent all around trail riding combo.

  22. #797
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    How much traction is enough can be dependant on the rider's goals more than anything. For someone that isn't pushing the limits constantly but can feel little traction losses (even subconsciously) more traction equals more confidence. (Not to dissuade you, it's a compromise anyway, of course.)
    Compromises are the name of the game in skis and bikes right? I'm running 2.5 DHF/ 2.4 DHR on i35 rims now, just test rode some industry nine wheels on my bike at NEMBA Fest with 2.3 Ikon/Minion SS combo. I get back to the I9 booth and the rep asks how the wheels were, I said hard to really say but holy crap those tires are fast. Has me thinking wider isn't really better for how I ride.

  23. #798
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,117
    Compromise: the reason a quiver of one is usually a little off? A second set of wheels might be calling after all.

  24. #799
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,347
    Quote Originally Posted by jono View Post
    Compromise: the reason a quiver of one is usually a little off? A second set of wheels might be calling after all.
    True, I can't imagine having a ski quiver of one.

    You might have just helped me decide which width to order the i9 wheels in since I'm keeping the wheelset I already have. 27 & 35 will give me choice of a rolling rocket and a burly setup. The 35's will probably live in a Karate Monkey w/3" tires until needed on the Bronson.

  25. #800
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,934
    Just built up some 28 mm IW rims for my 150 travel ibis mojo HD AM/XC bike. While I went for heavyish 2.5WT tires on my Nomad/Fox 36 with similar rim width last year, my Ibis will get something lighter and faster rolling. Leaning toward maxxis Rekon 2.6 3C up front, and Forekaster 2.6 dual compound rear. These nominally 2.6 tires coming out seem to have a casing width around 2.4” ie biggish but nowhere near a plus size tire.

    Open to other suggestions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •