Check Out Our Shop
Page 35 of 64 FirstFirst ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ... LastLast
Results 851 to 875 of 1600

Thread: 2017 Praxis Skis Info and Resource Thread

  1. #851
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    776
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    It IS realistic. Just get veneer topsheet next time. That shit settles the ski so much - and makes it 0.3 lbs lighter! Mine are lighter than normal due to 3 flex, and they are still crazy damp. See my review in the GPO thread.
    Yeah, the stock now includes veneers, which I think is why they’re light enough that I’d tour on them. I had planned on getting this ski custom, but the only thing I would have changed would probably be to add carbon and get the old gpo graphic stained in the veneer. So I figured the difference with the carbon was negligible, the ski would be a little cheaper and I could have it now instead of waiting until next season. And top-sheets don’t matter much to me.

    They’re damp for what they are, just not on3p damp.

    The praxis kool-aid tases great.

  2. #852
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Mountains, Trees, and a Big Blue Lake
    Posts
    678
    Quote Originally Posted by jorion View Post

    The praxis kool-aid tastes great.
    Had fun on them too today at the same place. Funny first day write up, you do know Tabke and Ayers won runs on them. Haven't skied them a bunch because of the coverage this season. They have been missed. Uber confidence inspiring skis if you can hang.
    I'm cool with this, as long as you Kirkwood Bro Brah's stay away from Heavenly when 88 closes- TahoeBc

  3. #853
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    2017 Praxis Skis Info and Resource Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by flowing alpy View Post
    MVP is my spring bump slush ski for quick turns in them,
    Rx doesn’t shine in tight bumps unless your skiing the tops.
    I like the MVP but most of my skiing is in winter conditions
    it's really just a skinny Rx that is more nimble than the OG
    MVP seems like a good choice for extreme versatility, like the Rx. I love my Rx though.. The predictability and versatility, as well as fun of Rx shape is insane. Insane in the f’n membrane.








    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #854
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,708
    The MVP is extremely versatile. At my towering 5’6.75’’ I can ski it centered or get all over the shovels / tips and they’ll perform and support either way, which I think is why I’ve settled on long playful skis as my favorite type. They ski up to 10-12’’ pretty well and floated my 200 lb load-ass.

    I’ve been really, really pleased with how they handle firm. Not ice, you know the real ice we deal with on the EC, they don’t do that. But I’ve had fun with them on groomers with man-made granular, spring conditions etc. well enough that I found no need to keep my 184 Monsters which just weren’t as fun- so much harder to balance in the air, pop off stuff, etc. I can rally the 193 MVP almost as hard.

    If you forced me to keep 1 pair of skis out of my 10, the 193 MVP what I would keep, even on the EC. It’s the ski I’ve used the most this season, albeit it’s been a good one.

  5. #855
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    985
    So compared to the MAP + carbon layups of the past how would that compare to Enduro/carbon/veneer? I preferred stock layup (no carbon) in the old layups for inbounds skiing.

    Debating on adding carbon or just sticking with Enduro + ambrosia maple veneer for the custom order (182 Q) Mainly inbounds skiing with shifts but may insert for race bindings in the future. IIR carbon saves maybe 0.3lbs?
    Common sense. So rare today in America it's almost like having a superpower.

  6. #856
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,180
    With shifts and a mainly inbounds plan, I’m thinking skip the carbon. Depends on what you like. Carbon add some snap, but maybe compromised dampness? I had a great time skiing 192 GPOs in bounds with a map/carbon and no veneer. Never felt like I needed a burlier ski at 170. Worth noting that I sold the GPO and kept Billy goats, but that was more about the pow performance and the RES tip. For trees and variable snow, the GPO was excellent in that layup.
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  7. #857
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Two different skis, but my 182 Q's (Enduro/Carbon/Veneer) feel much more damp than my 182 GPOs (MAP/Carbon/Nylon Top).

    People are saying that in identical builds, the Q wants to hang in the fall line longer than the Q. I agree with this (to the extent that I can compare two different layups), but obviously I can't say how much this has to do with the ski's design vs. the veneer.

    I'll bet if I had left the carbon out of the Qs, I'd be happy, but as it is, they definitely don't feel nervous or chattery. They're considerably more damped feeling than the GPOs.

    I certainly wouldn't want to lose any of the Q's quickness in tight spaces - especially since dampness isn't an issue with the Q's. They're nearly as solid feeling as the Billy Goats I just sold. Solid enough for this weenie.

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 03-25-2018 at 12:29 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  8. #858
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Bay Area / Tahoe
    Posts
    2,797
    No experience with carbon and Veneer together, but I'm definitely not a fan of carbon/Enduro/nylon topsheet for resort on my old Protests or my brother's BCs. Too harsh. For a light ski, I don't think the carbon would be worth the small decrease in weight.

  9. #859
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    16,627
    Veneers are awesome(maples). I don’t like the carbon in any ski I’ve had. With veneer option saving the same weight and adding dampness rather than giving it away , I’m
    Just not interested. Especially considering the
    enduro core is fairly light as is. I’m more interested in heavy core feedback at this point. Enduro/veneer does well everywhere. Interested to hear comparisons with the heavy core

  10. #860
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by Muggydude View Post
    No experience with carbon and Veneer together, but I'm definitely not a fan of carbon/Enduro/nylon topsheet for resort on my old Protests or my brother's BCs. Too harsh. For a light ski, I don't think the carbon would be worth the small decrease in weight.
    That is my experience as well. With the new(er) layup options I wasn't sure if veneer and carbon together serves much of a purpose. Perhaps the carbon gives some pop or rebound for people who like that.
    Common sense. So rare today in America it's almost like having a superpower.

  11. #861
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Quote Originally Posted by Self Jupiter View Post
    The MVP is extremely versatile. At my towering 5’6.75’’ I can ski it centered or get all over the shovels / tips and they’ll perform and support either way, which I think is why I’ve settled on long playful skis as my favorite type. They ski up to 10-12’’ pretty well and floated my 200 lb load-ass.

    I’ve been really, really pleased with how they handle firm. Not ice, you know the real ice we deal with on the EC, they don’t do that. But I’ve had fun with them on groomers with man-made granular, spring conditions etc. well enough that I found no need to keep my 184 Monsters which just weren’t as fun- so much harder to balance in the air, pop off stuff, etc. I can rally the 193 MVP almost as hard.

    If you forced me to keep 1 pair of skis out of my 10, the 193 MVP what I would keep, even on the EC. It’s the ski I’ve used the most this season, albeit it’s been a good one.
    What is the true length tape measure of 193 MVP?

  12. #862
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    whistler
    Posts
    1,164
    Trigger pulled.

    192 #4+ UL+V Protest
    192 #4 Enduro+C+V Yeti

    Summer's going to be long.

  13. #863
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,906
    Heading out to LCC with the family next weekend and tempted to bring my 188 Qs as my one ski. Usually bring a 98ish ski also but with bringing kids and wife and all gear it's tough to bring both. Did this last year w lightweight GPO and it worked fine but it also snowed a bunch. Forecast so far looks like pure spring conditions. Am I gonna hate life on the Q all weekend with no real fresh snow?

    Sent from my SM-G930V using TGR Forums mobile app

  14. #864
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,906
    Quote Originally Posted by steveski View Post
    So compared to the MAP + carbon layups of the past how would that compare to Enduro/carbon/veneer? I preferred stock layup (no carbon) in the old layups for inbounds skiing.

    Debating on adding carbon or just sticking with Enduro + ambrosia maple veneer for the custom order (182 Q) Mainly inbounds skiing with shifts but may insert for race bindings in the future. IIR carbon saves maybe 0.3lbs?
    I have Enduro + Ambrosia on my 188 Q and in limited use so far is a good resort layup
    Last edited by Duffman; 03-25-2018 at 04:57 PM.

  15. #865
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    449
    Any available 15% codes? Been waiting to pick up protests. I’m just ordering a stock build so with the veneers not being free I’m wondering if I should just wait for a Black Friday deal or something? The stock protest has veneer now.

  16. #866
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Where the climate suits my clothes.
    Posts
    5,603
    Do the codes work with presale prices? If so, my inbox would appreciate one as well!!

  17. #867
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the trench
    Posts
    16,627
    I'm sure muggy will be right along to pm you both

  18. #868
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,906
    Quote Originally Posted by JayPowHound View Post
    Do the codes work with presale prices? If so, my inbox would appreciate one as well!!
    They did last year .

  19. #869
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by JayPowHound View Post
    Do the codes work with presale prices? If so, my inbox would appreciate one as well!!
    Quote Originally Posted by wwwllw View Post
    Any available 15% codes? Been waiting to pick up protests. I’m just ordering a stock build so with the veneers not being free I’m wondering if I should just wait for a Black Friday deal or something? The stock protest has veneer now.
    PM sent to you both with codes.
    Common sense. So rare today in America it's almost like having a superpower.

  20. #870
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    I found heavy/carbon/veneer #4 to be very damp but also harsh. The ski is very powerfull. I would probably skip the carbon if I could choose now.

  21. #871
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Vinyl Valley
    Posts
    1,913
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    What is the true length tape measure of 193 MVP?

    190.5 cm
    Last edited by skuff; 03-27-2018 at 04:06 PM.

  22. #872
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
    Heading out to LCC with the family next weekend and tempted to bring my 188 Qs as my one ski. Usually bring a 98ish ski also but with bringing kids and wife and all gear it's tough to bring both. Did this last year w lightweight GPO and it worked fine but it also snowed a bunch. Forecast so far looks like pure spring conditions. Am I gonna hate life on the Q all weekend with no real fresh snow?

    Sent from my SM-G930V using TGR Forums mobile app
    Dem Q's dig the corn and soft groomers, honestly closer to a DD than just about anything designed for the fresher days. But, when it comes to anything overly icey hard they will remind you they're meant for the soft. Personally I wouldn't be worried at all as they are my "travel" ski, but I haven't checked the UT forecast
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  23. #873
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Quote Originally Posted by skuff View Post
    191.5 cm
    Thanks.

    Anyone ever tried a MVP with a heavy core.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  24. #874
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    tahoe de chingao
    Posts
    846
    Anyone notice some new topsheets in the lineup for this year's custom sale?

    The mushroom line drawing on a wood veneer would be *tits*

    Keith's a smart man for pushing those veneers out free last year and charging this year

  25. #875
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,906
    Quote Originally Posted by eskido View Post
    Dem Q's dig the corn and soft groomers, honestly closer to a DD than just about anything designed for the fresher days. But, when it comes to anything overly icey hard they will remind you they're meant for the soft. Personally I wouldn't be worried at all as they are my "travel" ski, but I haven't checked the UT forecast
    Yeah, I'm sure based on how they have been so far they will be managable. Ideallly a mid 100s ski makes a better travel stick if I was being nitpicky , but these will do

    Sent from my SM-G930V using TGR Forums mobile app

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •