The Fight for the Padded Room (NSFW)

[Supermoon]

I'd say a more appropriate analogy would be "we need to vet every person who wishes to sell an item in Gear Swap. How can we know they're legit and really have an item to sell?" Well, we don't, but we trust that most people are not thieves. Occasionally there may be one who slips in and they need to be dealt with. Same principle applies here.

But the consequences are much lower for accidentally buying something that was stolen. Maggot justice has worked well here in the past for sure.

But the harm that could potentially fall in someone who gets posted up is irreparable. So in my mind it needs a higher standard than Gear Swap

[Bromontana]

i think it's about the person in the image, but for tgr it's also about the regular and new visitor, and also about the way men are responding to a woman who is raising perfectly valid points in a manner no more aggressive or emotional or assholish or illogical than a lot of people here, but about an apparently sacred topic.

besides the attacks on mental health and physical appearance and social history, the arguments that because people here helped her she should shut the fuck up are pathetic. you helped somebody in need. you didn't buy her fucking thoughts and speech.

the entire episode is embarrassing for this "community." i'm trying to decide if it's more or less embarrassing than all the blatantly racist bullshit that was allowed to go on in polyass for a long time. but then there are so few people of color or women here, right?

all the women here are obviously strong in diverse respects and more than capable of ignoring or enjoying as they fit and i am no puritan. pornography is too diverse to make a blanket statement. obviously plenty of for profit, for pleasure exploitation in some regards, but also fun, intimate expression by lovers.

but this is a ski site. i don't understand why they or anybody else should have to ignore regular objectification of women in images and words when they come to a ski site or why a large percentage of potential viewers would want to. and taking it a step further, one could wonder what advertisers think about this. the nsfw threads are tgr saying "can i show you my dick?"

it's disheartening that so many people demonstrate a fundamental lack of respect, can't see the harm in that or their subsequent rabid defense of it, and then can't make the connection to larger societal and global problems.

Agree, any critique I may have of the method isn't relevant to the substance.

[iceman]

I will say that if I had killed the tags I would unkill them. Why can't we have tags? I don't get it.

[Mazderati]

But the consequences are much lower for accidentally buying something that was stolen. Maggot justice has worked well here in the past for sure.

But the harm that could potentially fall in someone who gets posted up is irreparable. So in my mind it needs a higher standard than Gear Swap

Subjective.

[mtngirl79]

I'd say a more appropriate analogy would be "we need to vet every person who wishes to sell an item in Gear Swap. How can we know they're legit and really have an item to sell?" Well, we don't, but we trust that most people are not thieves. Occasionally there may be one who slips in and they need to be dealt with. Same principle applies here.

Except all it takes to right a wrong in gear swap is money.

Once someone's intimate pictures are on the internet, it's there forever and could pop up at any time and cause serious problems.

[The AD]

Subjective.

Subjective and also as far as we know only a theoretical problem at this point. If someone came here and posted "hey, dickhead posted a photo of me without my consent!" that would be one thing, but that hasn't happened.

[DBdude]

this is ridiculous, all this regarding one thread resurrected once a year. again, this is about mtngrl. how can this not be obvious when taking into account her history here? This board is a sausage fest and this is where mtngrl comes to display her existential issues about men

[My Pet Powder Goat]

But the consequences are much lower for accidentally buying something that was stolen. Maggot justice has worked well here in the past for sure.

But the harm that could potentially fall in someone who gets posted up is irreparable. So in my mind it needs a higher standard than Gear Swap

I'm not condoning non-consensual naked pics in any way, it's creepy, but what's with all the "harm" and "safety" for the women Bullshit?

Correct me if I'm wrong but none of the pictures show the women's face of have them wearing name tags.

Posting a non "consental" post is lame, but that argument is bunk.


Also, to address spooks assertion that because some of us donated money to help mtngirl through a rough patch we've bought her silence, couldn't be further from the truth.
I personally brought it up because she treats us like we're all "stranger danger" and evil men ready to rape anything walking, when actually weve proven ourselves to be caring and concerned for the well being and safety of women. Yet she willing to throw us under her bus to drum up drama and get her way.

Also, my 'ban mtngirl' post was facetious in nature: You guys have to Lighten up, This is the PR.

[MagnificentUnicorn]

So much melodrama.

[DBdude]

so true

you could say hysterical - hahahahahahaha

[Bromontana]

^here we go with bell curves again

Edit: jono deletion has left my poast arone.

[Supermoon]

I'm not condoning non-consensual naked pics in any way, but what's with all the "harm" and "safety" of the women Bullshit? Correct me if I'm wrong but bin of the pictures show the women's face of have them wearing name tags.

Posting a non "consental" post is lame, but that argument is bunk

Women have lost their jobs, their kids, been publicly shamed and lost new relationships because of photos posted of them online without their consent. Maybe it hasn’t happened here yet, but the risk is there. Again, it’s a risk mitigation scenario. And there is little to no community benefit from those posts.

Like someone posted above, the Ullr thread started out with change for a nickel stickers on some cleavage. It would be reasonable to assume that those have consent to be posted if the poster says so. But later in the thread you get guys posting photos of a woman getting dressed across the room with a wink wink nudge nudge when someone asks if the woman knew. That shit is clearly over the line and should be removed unless they can show proof there was consent.

[GeezerSteve]

Subjective and also as far as we know only a theoretical problem at this point.

Yeah, that's easy for you to say, but think of the theoretical trauma that theoretically could be suffered by the theoretical victim if her nude pic were theoretically posted without consent, theoretically.

[DBdude]

oye

just nuke the fucking thread

you win mtngrl. you have tamed the beast once again. bra - fucking - vo

slow golf clap

[Danno]

No, it's not the only approach. How about simply telling people not to post nekked photos of others without their consent? I don't really understand why that's not enough. Just add it to the Padded Room disclaimer.

Agree

But how do you enforce it? We all agree on the concept, but are disagreeing on what level of proof we should require.

It’s all a risk mitigation exercise. Your suggestion is more like “let’s ski this slope and if it slides we won’t ski it the rest of the day” and I think we should be digging pits and reading terrain.

I'd say a more appropriate analogy would be "we need to vet every person who wishes to sell an item in Gear Swap. How can we know they're legit and really have an item to sell?" Well, we don't, but we trust that most people are not thieves. Occasionally there may be one who slips in and they need to be dealt with. Same principle applies here.

Agree with AD.

But the consequences are much lower for accidentally buying something that was stolen. Maggot justice has worked well here in the past for sure.

But the harm that could potentially fall in someone who gets posted up is irreparable. So in my mind it needs a higher standard than Gear Swap

The potential harm to someone whose naked picture gets posted may be greater, but it's an attenuated potential. The harm to the poster that got scammed is far more concrete (and it's likely not buying an item that was stolen, it's buying an item that the seller doesn't have or doesn't send). Real $$$ lost, and "maggot justice" is fun to say but not very powerful. There was the incident with the camera that was awesome, but Jesse Jones still got away with his theft; how many other examples of justice were there? And before some of the SJWs here say I'm equating a few dollars with someone's life or reputation, I'll say that sure, I can imagine consequences befalling someone that are horrific if her photo got posted here without consent. But it's very attenuated, the consequences are all hypothetical even if in this scenario the crime is real, whereas the consequences if someone gets scammed in gear swap are real and not hypothetical. And in both cases, we're still talking about someone on this board that violates rules and violates trust, and on one side you have people saying we must assume that everyone is doing this because some people surely will, and on the other side you have people saying we should assume that they are not doing this until proven otherwise.

Regardless, as I've said before, there really is no way to police consent, whether it is "porn" or personal photos in the Ullr thread. You either take people at their word or you don't allow naked pictures, everything else is unenforceable.

[The AD]

Yeah, that's easy for you to say, but think of the theoretical trauma that theoretically could be suffered by the theoretical victim if her nude pic were theoretically posted without consent, theoretically.

I agree. Theoretically.

[Supermoon]

Regardless, as I've said before, there really is no way to police consent, whether it is "porn" or personal photos in the Ullr thread. You either take people at their word or you don't allow naked pictures, everything else is unenforceable.

If those are really the only two options then I know what side I’m on.

I’m honestly am trying to be reasonable here and suggest things that I think are workable. It’s everyone on the other side who seems to be saying “fuck it let’s just ban porn then.”

[MTT]

I did notice that there used to be fair number of women here, the past 4 years There are not.

I don't think it's about pictures, It's about the people here and how they interact with others.

I heard indirectly that some creepy shit has gone down in the background.

[PNWbrit]

But there's no effective way to enforce either rule. The only effective way to stop the theoretical nonconsensual nude pic is to ban all nude pics and to enforce that rule.

Would that really be that big a deal?

I don't think it's about pictures

We could take the chance that it is?

[mtngirl79]

Nice, Danno.

Thanks for showing me the world, and many men in are a million times more fucked up than I thought.

You are equating participating in gear swap.. something where only money is at risk and the participants are willing and presumably know the risks with the potential of pictures that you would like to enjoy causing irreparable harm to a person that didn't even agree to play the game.

This is rape culture on display.

This is why Harvey Weinstein and the others got away with it for so long.

[Danno]

Ah yes, I am the Harvey Weinsteins of the world. Fuck you, seriously.

[willywhit]

Nice, Danno.

Thanks for showing me the world, and many men in are a million times more fucked up than I thought.

You are equating participating in gear swap.. something where only money is at risk and the participants are willing and presumably know the risks with the potential of pictures that you would like to enjoy causing irreparable harm to a person that didn't even agree to play the game.

This is rape culture on display.

This is why Harvey Weinstein and the others got away with it for so long.

and this is your way of showing the world that raping someone is the same as posting titty pics on a ski forum ?

WEAK SAUCE, girl...you're going after the wrong crowd, but it's easy, right ? trolling

[digitaldeaths mom]

Except all it takes to right a wrong in gear swap is money.

Once someone's intimate pictures are on the internet, it's there forever and could pop up at any time and cause serious problems.

Young lady, it's the digital age you should expect any pictures or things you say in word or print will make their way onto social media. What was once portrayed by a brush and canvas and then later by photography and film has evolved. The famous painting by Titian, "The Rape of Europa" (now in the Gardener Museum in Boston) was painted circa 1550. Would you walk into the museum today and declare that such a painting be removed from the walls of the museum on moral and ethical grounds?

[digitaldeath]

Nice, Danno.

Thanks for showing me the world, and many men in are a million times more fucked up than I thought.

You are equating participating in gear swap.. something where only money is at risk and the participants are willing and presumably know the risks with the potential of pictures that you would like to enjoy causing irreparable harm to a person that didn't even agree to play the game.

This is rape culture on display.

This is why Harvey Weinstein and the others got away with it for so long.

if you taking nude pics, you agreed to play that game

one must assume all pics and videos will eventually be uploaded

[willywhit]

Except all it takes to right a wrong in gear swap is money.

Once someone's intimate pictures are on the internet, it's there forever and could pop up at any time and cause serious problems.

and that's why you should stay home, with your cats and your low fat bucket of ice cream. Trolling for justice. Nobody cares what you think