Check Out Our Shop
Page 86 of 626 FirstFirst ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... LastLast
Results 2,126 to 2,150 of 15626

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #2126
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    62
    Reduced length or height of that tail rocker? (or both?)

  2. #2127
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    155
    I'm still waiting to hear the recommended mount point..


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  3. #2128
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    1,643
    just put my moolah where my moocher is.

    Now time to sell some shit before the next cc statement meets mrs. slackey's gaze

  4. #2129
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by SeatownSlackey View Post
    just put my moolah where my moocher is. [emoji3][emoji3]

    Now time to sell some shit before the next cc statement meets mrs. slackey's gaze
    Fuck yeah man!

  5. #2130
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Quote Originally Posted by SeatownSlackey View Post
    just put my moolah where my moocher is.

    Now time to sell some shit before the next cc statement meets mrs. slackey's gaze
    What flex did you go for?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #2131
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    1,643
    Tweener. +1.5

    Don't you dare go second guessing full Aever now [emoji6]

  7. #2132
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    9
    Know this comes up a bit but thought I'd share as saw someone else umming and ahhing about this the other day also. Below is an email chain with the good folks at ON3P re: how to build out a quiver for low-snow around a 186 Jeffrey 114 ... Wanted to share their response for others benefits. Worth calling out that their customer engagement is off the charts too but everyone here has probably picked that up.

    Ended up going with a 1. Kartel 108, 2. keeping the Jeff 114 for filled-in powder days and 3. Running a pair of protests for the highest of tides (fingers crossed). I actually reckon Ill sub out the Jeff's next year for a pair of BGs and create a bit of a 2.5 ski that bridges the Kartel into the Protests.

    My question:

    Hey guys, keep up the good work! Your products rock and your customer engagement on TGR and Newschoolers is unreal ... I'm the proud owner of a pair of 186 ON3P Jeffreys. Great ski but definitely more burly than I was expecting ... totally fine as have ended up skiing them directionally with straight airs and hits only and had a blast. I had bought the J's thinking I'd be popping and spinning all over the hill. Truth is, I don't go big enough in the air with enough conviction and skill to get that out of the ski (particularly at my size ... I know others do). I'm trying to work out whether I play to my strengths (fall line, straight hits) or try tease out some inner jibbiness that used to be there. So in a round about way, my question is this:1. Is the Kartel 98 too jibby for the low snow days where I might make 1000 turns but only look to spin a couple of times? 2. Is it a good bridge to help me spend 90% of crap days working on said jibbiness that I can translate into my big(ger) mountain riding? 3. Should I just sell the 186 Js and size down in the 108 Kartels and run a 1 ski do everything setup for all but the biggest days?Basically, want to get to a spot where my days on the Jeffrey are more expressive. I'm 5'9" 176lbs (formerly of 185lbs fame) and the best skier on the mountain (jks). know its a dissertation but any help with these existential questions would be much appreciated in these dog days before winterGood folks at ON3Ps response:

    Hey Tom,

    Thanks for the note and the kind words

    At your size, I can definitely see how a 186 Jeffery feels like a lot of ski. Being a similar stature (5'10, 180lbs), I've gone through a similar quiver evolution; I started on a dead center mounted 186 Jeffery 110, and have since moved over to a 181 Kartel 108 mounted at -2. 50/50 all mountain/park skier, and the 108 slays it everywhere, everyday.

    Not sure whether you have a Jeff 110 or 114 (the 110 was a little softer than the 114), but either way the main update that the Kartel received from the Jeffery was that we lengthened the effective edge in the tail, giving a little more stability and length in the rear. We also modified the tip/tail taper so it planes more effectively, along with smoother and more intuitive edge to edge transfer. I now feel equal increased agility/playfulness along with increased stability/float on my K108s, even though they're a shorter, slightly narrower ski.

    As far as K98 vs. K108 goes, it really just depends on your location and priorities. If you would prioritize hardpack performance and edge grip, the narrower waist of the 98 would obviously be beneficial. However, the K108 definitely holds its own on west coast hardpack, and provides a marked increase in float on bigger days. Overall, I think you gain more float out of the 108 than you gain in edge grip with the 98, if that makes sense. You can always get used to a wider ski in the park, but you can't make a narrower ski float like a wider ski will.

    Hope that helps a bit. Feel free to reach out if you have anymore questions. Thanks!


  8. #2133
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,027
    Quote Originally Posted by SeatownSlackey View Post
    just put my moolah where my moocher is. [emoji3][emoji3]

    Now time to sell some shit before the next cc statement meets mrs. slackey's gaze
    Full Aever?

  9. #2134
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by SeatownSlackey View Post
    Tweener. +1.5

    Don't you dare go second guessing full Aever now [emoji6]
    Definitely not second guessing lol. I want a beast for Big Sky..

    However I am thinking of getting another pair, with the 1.5x carbon. Would like to have one pair 2x, and one pair 1.5x.

    I have to sell 3 pairs of skis before I do that though.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #2135
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by paalrune View Post
    Reduced length or height of that tail rocker? (or both?)
    Similar length, 1.75cm lower final tail height.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  11. #2136
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    147
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Definitely not second guessing lol. I want a beast for Big Sky..

    However I am thinking of getting another pair, with the 1.5x carbon. Would like to have one pair 2x, and one pair 1.5x.

    I have to sell 3 pairs of skis before I do that though.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Whatcha gonna sell 😎😎😎

    Sent from my Pixel XL using TGR Forums mobile app

  12. #2137
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post


    Hope you like em.
    I appreciate this big time, I will do my part and spread the word. I already tell everyone that On3p makes the BEST skis around..

    You guys rock!

    I’m probably gonna get another pair. Question is, do I go regular flex or 1.5x?


    Quote Originally Posted by BDevil17 View Post
    Whatcha gonna sell [emoji41][emoji41][emoji41]

    Sent from my Pixel XL using TGR Forums mobile app
    Hellbents, BG Tours, and idk what else yet.



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by Betelgeuse; 10-25-2017 at 11:31 PM.

  13. #2138
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,957
    Have a handful of Supergoat orders that came in. Thanks to those that are stepping up!

    Remember pre-sale ends 11/6, just sayin'.
    You should have been here yesterday!

  14. #2139
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  15. #2140
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,090
    I love the concept of these SGs, but am not sure i am man/skier enough for them!

    Sent from my SM-G935V using TGR Forums mobile app

  16. #2141
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    There’s only one way to find out!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  17. #2142
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189
    I am so on the fence... My quiver is out of control, but holy shit at 6'4" and 205lbs these skis would fit my Clydesdale physique... If I did not have new 194 Qs and brand new 189 108s this year it would be a no brainier...

    The Bucks are playing PSU this weekend so no doubt heavy drinking will take place so drunk buying is a very strong possibility...

  18. #2143
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by Undertow View Post
    I am so on the fence... My quiver is out of control, but holy shit at 6'4" and 205lbs these skis would fit my Clydesdale physique... If I did not have new 194 Qs and brand new 189 108s this year it would be a no brainier...

    The Bucks are playing PSU this weekend so no doubt heavy drinking will take place so drunk buying is a very strong possibility...
    So are you a Bucks or Penn fan?

    I say go for it, if you need to sell the Qs just do it.. you know you want the SG. Also, impaired shopping is the best and the worst. That's why I try not to drink too much, because I make bad (good?) decisions...

  19. #2144
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Quote Originally Posted by Undertow View Post
    so drunk buying is a very strong possibility...
    LOL. Story of my life. Every time on the fence, a couple beers helps me make the right decision. Truth comes out after a few. No regrets.

    You are the perfect size for these bad boys. Who knows when they will make them again. Go with the 1.5x carbon.

  20. #2145
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Got any pictures of the Gunmetal and Garnet top sheets?

    Not going super goat... but may be upgrading my regular goats after 4-5 years and passing along the old ones to a friend.

  21. #2146
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Got any pictures of the Gunmetal and Garnet top sheets?

    Not going super goat... but may be upgrading my regular goats after 4-5 years and passing along the old ones to a friend.
    First time we've offered them is on the SuperGoats - so no photos yet.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  22. #2147
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Garnet looks ultra classy


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  23. #2148
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Mosier, OR
    Posts
    171
    I am so tempted to pick up a pair of SG's even though I need another pair of skis like I need a hole in me head. But, since I am a Mt Hood local, I feel like I should own at least 1 pair of ON3P's and these are right up my alley. I've never skied or even flexed a standard pair of BG's so can somebody give me some stiffness reference points to go on? I've been on mostly Bluehouse skis for the past few years as they pretty much gave those things away and I have a garage full of them. I have a couple of pairs of Bluehouse Shoots (191cm) which are the stiffest ski I've ever been on or flexed and they are no problem for me- I even have a pair mounted tele. I am 6' and ~215 lbs and ski fairly aggressively/fast. Should I play it safe and get the 1.5's or step up to the Aevergreene's? Appreciate any input from those experienced with these. Thanks.

  24. #2149
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    ON3P doesn't make skis that aren't any fun to ski. I would say go Aevergreene.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  25. #2150
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    774
    Oldmil, I am the same size as you, been on some stiff skis, and Telemark also. I went 1.5. Unlike the shoots and other stiff bastards of years past the shape of the goats will be a lot easier to turn. On the regular 189 last spring, it skied great in spring mashed potatoes but felt much shorter than the 189 might suggest. I am expecting more comfort at speed and a bigger landing platform with a tip that will not tunnel in new snow as much. As a Hood skier, it is about time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •