RAX, beater
RAX, beater
Galibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
Guys! My Wren statement was heavily caveat-ed, and they're on the list. Breathe. I'm not discounting the minuscule possibility that no ski makes frozen bumps in Phoenix/Spellbound super enjoyable. Jury is out for now.
And I have wasted far too much of my company's time searching for 210+ straight skis on Craiglist and Ebay. Guess I'm stuck with the pre-pubescent sizes until I pick up El Chup's GS boards in January.
Galibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
So, given: RESORT and DAILY DRIVER
Unless you have discovered the resort that can guarantee fresh snow every night, or even every other night, why the fuck would you think that anything over 90 mm would be applicable, you ignorant sluts????
I agree for hard snow and I am ignorant as fuck for sure. OP was asking about 95 to 100 though. Too much gap between 88 and 116 for me. I size the length of my hard snow skis down though. Maybe that is why my Brahma fall down for me sometimes.
Everybody needs a pair of skinny skis to rip cord and ice. I figure that is a given.
So it depends how you define daily driver. To me it is something that can handle hard, soft, slush. Not great at anything but keeps things moving top to bottom.
On3p Wren 98 is my ski for that niche. Targhee is my home mountain so there are many soft snow days that I am on something wider.
If you can have more than one pair of alpine skis why waste one of them on something 95-105mm?
If you mostly stick to the groomers - 17/18 Brahma
If you want to spend more time on firm off piste or moguls - Wrenegade 88
Legend 96 (despite being in the cm of mediocracy) is a fun fucking ski but might be a bit turny for your tastes. One of the few skis over 90 I’d recommend. Excelles in variable spring snow in a variety of terrain. Rips quick to medium turns on firm.
Last edited by XavierD; 10-24-2017 at 10:35 PM.
Kendo, bmx88. Both rip bumps, groomers, firm and all conditions that arent deep.
Fischer Pro MTN 86 (175 or 182)
Fischer Pro MTN 95 (178 or 186)
Kastle MX 89 (180)
While I also really like the 85-90 width if there’s no fresh snow (and you can have more than one pair)...
I’m preferring 105ish underfoot for most resort powdays out here. As always, depends where you ski, but with light and dry snow that rarely gets PNW deep, the modern 100-105 shapes float and stay loose enough just fine. And, when shit gets tracked out towards the end of the day, its way more comfortable skiing 105 than 115. Think alpine wind buffed 6-8” powder day.
Save the 115-125 for the big powder days - width depending on the shape and how long the untracked lasts.
Dale's Pale Ale.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Stockli-Sto...m/192331639223
Very hard to ski bumps on but rips the shit out of everything else.
^What about Trees?
Looks like the price went up on those..
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I dunno, replace "Snow" with "Ellsworth" and you have a match.
Rustler 10s, 4frnt Devastators or Kore 105s. All pretty different, but cover each ski style pretty damn well
Must resist...! I have Stockli XL and today that ski is the silkiest snow feeling ski I have ever been on and just flat out kicked ass... Need to say it again - must resist...!
Sent from my SM-G955U using TGR Forums mobile app
Bookmarks