What's the pricepoint on the Vulcan? I might be replacing my Titans with these next season.
What's the pricepoint on the Vulcan? I might be replacing my Titans with these next season.
But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer
About $ 1000
I'm going to have to get a job...
But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer
Godamn they are pricy. Maybe try the Maestrale RS instead which probably has 90% of the performance, is 2x uglier but is "only" 699.
Btw - probably going to spend 3 wks in Haines next year in mar - april
I hate the way scarpa boots fit. Titans are the only at boots that ever worked for me. I had lasers, spirit 3 and 4 and skied skookums for a couple days and they just didn't work for me. To be fair the titans didn't work either until I put in intuitions.
But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer
Maestrale is totally different last than Spirit 3, 4 or Lasers. Smaller heel pockets, slightly smaller toe box. I put my own intuition liners in both the titan/zzeus and maestrale to make it fit. For the Spirit boots and Skookum I had to use a helluva lot of foampadding to take up space. Vulcans fit well though - no padding required. It's got a nice performance fit for sure
Lee, any info on the lest width, like what will it be it in the smaller sizes, 24-25?
The floggings will continue until morale improves.
And does this mean the Vulcan fit is about like the Titan/Zzeus? Or a little wider or narrower?
Ski edits | http://vimeo.com/user389737/videos
I'm actually still kind of butthurt over a warranty issue I had with my spirit 3s, deformed tech fittings. It took almost 2 months to get them replaced and I missed some awesome skiing because of it. I actually bought factors in the interim and I have scars on my feet from the blisters. I've had nothing but awesome experiences with Dynafit's warranty so...
But Ellen kicks ass - if she had a beard it would be much more haggard. -Jer
At 135 lbs and poor I'll be passing on the Vulcan. I'm really interested in the ONE and Mercury boots. What would I be giving up going with the One vs the Mercury? Seems like the main difference is the material: pebax vs Grilamid.
Last edited by Skiwald; 05-04-2012 at 12:03 AM.
the maestrale vs maestrale RS story tells that pebax and grilamid (or grilamid-like nylons) are VERY different in stiffness. I believe the one will be significantly softer than the mercury
MERCURY- made from grilamid, has secondary removable tongue
ONE- made from either pebax (PX) or polyurethane (PU), only 1 tongue.
MERCURY and ONE boots are the same weight, but the mercury includes 2 tongues, so it is basically 70g lighter than the ONE boot if neither have the second tongue on there.
The one PX will feel the softest, since pebax shells deform more than PU or grilamid.
i found the VULCAN pretty much stiff enough without the second tongue, and doubt i would use it much personally.
Jong post alert. I know this isn't a direct comparison but it does have some relevance. Can anyone compare the functionality and performance of a Vulcan vs the new Lange XT or Cochise? It seems like the vulcan could offer the best of both worlds enabling one boot for Alpine and AT using tech bindings vs. a duke-like binding with the Langes/ cochises. Since I have not skied tech bindings I am curious of their performance vs a duke or Guardian type binding for inbounds days. I know its lower and lighter but how does it do in trees and tracked out if you are going to have tech on a ski that I would normally use for both AT and Alpine?
Be more like your dog...
no, if I had found commentary from Marshal and others that I trusted, I wouldn't have asked. And no, I did read several articles this weekend and none addressed this. There could be some and if you know of them, I would appreciate the links.
Be more like your dog...
i have a big article coming in the next couple weeks, but quickly:
unless you ski inbounds on duke/tech or grind the piss out of the vulcan's sole, you are not skiing it inbounds. the soles will not work well in alpine bindings IMO.
the lange xt and fisher ranger are...... underwhelming. the walk mode articulation is more similar to a factor. there is no spine in the boot, so they are outgunned on mixed and firm snow. the flex of both are soft because of the lack of spine and the soft materials used on the cuff (and lower in the fisher's case). oh, and neither are tech compatible, which these days is required to be even discussed as being a touring boot in any capacity IMO.
the cochise pro and pro lite (if you downsize 1 shell) are really basically legit alpine boots with a darn good walk mode, interchangeable soles, and the shells are only 150g heavier than a vulcan/mercury/one. i just run the dynafit heels 100% of the time and switch toes between tech and alpine. works great.
the vulcan flex pattern is sorta weird. i was surprised by how much i didn't like it. the boot flexes smoother without the added tongue. i would strongly suggest trying them on in the fall before buying. the TLT5 and Titan both have a more performance/snug/even compression fit than the vulcan. neither fit all that similarly to the vulcan.
anyhow, several thousand words of actual review are coming.
Last edited by marshalolson; 05-07-2012 at 09:32 AM.
I agree it is a constitutional right for Americans to be assholes...its just too bad that so many take the opportunity...iscariot
Excellent info! this is great. Until my knee and ankle heal up I can't tell how a boot will fit so I got plenty of time. Can you post up when and where to find this info once it's published?
Much appreciated.
Be more like your dog...
Bookmarks