Check Out Our Shop
Page 13 of 24 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 578

Thread: 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the wasteland
    Posts
    3,181
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    No less legit than moguls or aerials IMO. Was there even any effort to get skiing pipe in these games? What about 2014?


    Wescott's comeback in that race was incredible. I had heard he won, but halfway through the race I was just thinking there was no way. You never see anyone make up that much ground in final.
    I thought it was sad and shocking how low the level was in that competition. Boarders flailing all over the place and sliding out in turns without even bring touched.
    You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    869
    2 x thanks for your TR, skiingnow.

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,897
    Worked the Swiss House tonight. Defago and Cologna in the house. Defago absolutely killed it in his race today, one of the most impresive runs I can remember from recent history, just how aggressive he came out of the start and how smooth he skied the course, I knew it was his.

    Pretty funny night, guy running the Swiss House talking like they are an International Embassy, above the local law.

    Maybe the biggest party of the Olympics in Whistler anyway. Glad I was a part of it.

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,546
    Quote Originally Posted by pineconepete View Post
    this is 2 nights in a row the zamboni's fucked up
    starting to look like the 3 stooges running the rink
    Seriously. How can Canadians fail at this? Those guys should be forced to move to Mexico.

    Quote Originally Posted by kailas View Post
    What happened to your record Nov. snow fall Whistler-Blackcomb??
    There's plenty of snow in Whistler. That hasn't been a problem. Cypress Mountain is the place with no snow.

    Anyway, I noticed the super combined has been postponed due to snow overnight. It snowed 10 cm in the last 24 hours. Can't they just groom the damn hill? Four inches of new snow cancels a race? Maybe they just need to quit being so picky.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    4,153
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    Anyway, I noticed the super combined has been postponed due to snow overnight. It snowed 10 cm in the last 24 hours. Can't they just groom the damn hill? Four inches of new snow cancels a race? Maybe they just need to quit being so picky.
    You obvioulsy have no ski racing background and don't understand how a speed event works.
    If you put groomers on the hill, you will destroy the course. Once groomed the hill will need to set up for a while. Grooming will soften things up too much. One a few guys run, there will be huge holes and ruts.
    Especially since the hill has been injected in certain senctions.
    I am assuming that the snow was super wet as well.
    This creates dangerous conditions for the athletes, especially if they get off line and into the soft snow at speed.
    The last thing these olympics need is another injury.

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,546
    Quote Originally Posted by skideeppow View Post
    You obvioulsy have no ski racing background and don't understand how a speed event works.
    You're right there, but I still think the idea that a ski race can be canceled due to snow is a little bit funny. I bet they'd find a way to run the event today except the weather is supposed to clear up from here on out.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    yo momma's
    Posts
    723
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    Can't they just groom the damn hill? Four inches of new snow cancels a race?
    They did a rebuild of a lot of the women's course a few days back. Groomers, then a large scale step program by the slippers that covers the entire slope - not just the race line. All in all, it takes multiple hours.

    Putting a groomer on the track softens the course too much, they want it really firm - which it is underneath the new snow. A step program is a better way to conserve the track condition. Once a groomer goes onto the track you are looking at minimum 12 hours before it *may* be used for racing. Also, the warmer temperatures mean that a groomer would just do more damage than help.

    Both tracks are extremely soft at the bottom. They can't stand up to 60 or 80 of the best skiers in the world. Yesterday was the only day in the last 10 days where conditions were close to ideal. You could see how much the times changes in the latter part of the race - the window of opportunity lasted about 2/3 of the race before the conditions degraded.

    Hope that was coherent.
    Recently overheard: "Hey Ralph, what were you drinking that time that you set your face on fire?"

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    You're right there, but I still think the idea that a ski race can be canceled due to snow is a little bit funny. I bet they'd find a way to run the event today except the weather is supposed to clear up from here on out.
    low vis will cancel speed event. Not much the organizers can do about low clouds and poor vis. Plus as mentioned above the snow is a lot softer lower down which makes the course dangerous.

    The last thing the organizers want is to cancel an event. It puts A LOT of strain on the volunteer course crew and slippers.

    The forcast is for sun after this system passes so why not wait for better conditions for the racers and cameras?

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,546
    Quote Originally Posted by Oarhead View Post
    Both tracks are extremely soft at the bottom.
    Which leads to another question I had: was there ever any consideration of having the courses higher on the mountain? Personally, I think it would be very cool to start the downhill in the alpine. Maybe start by coming down the Saddle. That way they could avoid the soft snow near Creekside.

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    Which leads to another question I had: was there ever any consideration of having the courses higher on the mountain? Personally, I think it would be very cool to start the downhill in the alpine. Maybe start by coming down the Saddle. That way they could avoid the soft snow near Creekside.
    that probably would have been better but it would have been more of an impact on mountain operations and half of the olympics is the show and spectator access which is best where the race currently ends.

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,546
    Quote Originally Posted by skiingnow View Post
    half of the olympics is the show and spectator access which is best where the race currently ends.
    That would definitely be the downside, but isn't the current finish area a ways uphill from Creekside anyway?

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ørsta, Norway
    Posts
    421
    Why are all the American snowboarders wearing what looks like jeans? I didn't know Iceman was a pro boardercrosser.

  13. #313
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by kailas View Post
    What happened to your record Nov. snow fall Whistler-Blackcomb??

    Hey man its BC, they're all high on that great bud.
    Not to interject any thing remotely factual into the usual TGR- I-don't know the fuck Im talking about but I'm going to open my mouth and say something stupid just to say it - moment but

    Skiing in Whistler Blackcomb is just fine.

    Next question?

  14. #314
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    salty town
    Posts
    268
    Quote Originally Posted by PulverSchwein View Post
    so I assume ^^this^^ is why I'm sitting at home watching the downhill instead of watching the snowboard cross up at Cypress. Pretty sure I'd be able to stay on my feet without killing myself up there. Jesus if I wasn't on such a high from the last three awesome days, if this was my only event, I'd be fucking pissed right now

    It was slushy and a bit slippery at Cypress yesterday but the area was pretty flat. I could see it being a gong show if the terrain was uneven
    The safety issue is that the standing room area is on about a foot of snow placed on top of straw bails. The straw bails were flown in and weigh like 1000 pounds. Some of the bails do not line up flush and there are gaps. The snow that was pushed on top of the straw didnt fill in all the gaps. People working in the area were postholing thru the snow and into these gaps basically three foot holes, I saw a guy nearly break his leg and another almost blow out a knee. The reason straw and snow had to be flown in is because the finish area before the straw and heli flown snow was bare ground (mud). Plus the design of the trim on the grandstand has about three feet of exposed scafolding beneath the graphics and straw bails where used to create the illusion of deep snow and hide the scaffolding
    "For in the end life and liberty can be as much endangered from illegal methods used to convict those thought to be criminals as from the actual criminals themselves".

  15. #315
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Whistler
    Posts
    54
    They are running Creekside Gondola and Garbanzo chair 24 hours a day to allow the Weasel workers to maintain the ski runs. No machine grooming, all by hand now.

  16. #316
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Quote Originally Posted by Snow Ranger View Post
    The safety issue is that the standing room area is on about a foot of snow placed on top of straw bails. The straw bails were flown in and weigh like 1000 pounds. Some of the bails do not line up flush and there are gaps. The snow that was pushed on top of the straw didnt fill in all the gaps. People working in the area were postholing thru the snow and into these gaps basically three foot holes, I saw a guy nearly break his leg and another almost blow out a knee. The reason straw and snow had to be flown in is because the finish area before the straw and heli flown snow was bare ground (mud). Plus the design of the trim on the grandstand has about three feet of exposed scafolding beneath the graphics and straw bails where used to create the illusion of deep snow and hide the scaffolding
    Thanks for posting that, makes a lot of sense. One thing the public and media don't really seem to understand is the difference between Cypress and Whistler/Blackcomb.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  17. #317
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,107
    Quote Originally Posted by wbsr View Post
    They are running Creekside Gondola and Garbanzo chair 24 hours a day to allow the Weasel workers to maintain the ski runs. No machine grooming, all by hand now.
    wow. very impressive. those guys are working super hard.

  18. #318
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    South Central Spud Land.
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Singel View Post
    Snowboard cross - wow - how did the Canadian lose that lead?

    Nice to see Mr. Anti Establishment take a spill.
    I like to think it was something to do with the very fine tuning of my friend Curtis Bacca, who tuned Seth's board, but there is prolly some talent on Westcotts part too.

    http://waxroom.com/

    Interesting reaction when Bode looked up and saw he got beat by 4/100ths - an instant smile. As opposed to the spambots steely grimace. Fuck I thought skiing and ski racing was supposed to be fun.
    Quote Originally Posted by skuba View Post
    you can let it free and be as stupid as possible


    Thread Killer
    I would like to see your point of view but I can't get my head that far up your ass.

  19. #319
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,266
    Quote Originally Posted by runethechamp View Post
    I thought it was sad and shocking how low the level was in that competition. Boarders flailing all over the place and sliding out in turns without even bring touched.
    I think it was just a reflection of how bad the conditions were on the course. When you have world-class riders flailing like that there is usually a good reason.

  20. #320
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    That would definitely be the downside, but isn't the current finish area a ways uphill from Creekside anyway?
    The race ends at the timing flats which is at an elevation of 825m.
    Creekside is at 650m

    The top of the Dave Murray is 1680m.

  21. #321
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,131
    If we thought the men were bad, the women were appalling. It looked like a gargantuan struggle to make it down the course on their own in qually. The races oughtta be exciting seeing 4 of them try at once...or not.

  22. #322
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Valley
    Posts
    1,534
    if the course is giving snowbaords this much trouble, they better alter it a lot or there are going to be many ski cross injuries.
    I could go on, and on, and on...but who cares

  23. #323
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,546
    Quote Originally Posted by skiingnow View Post
    The race ends at the timing flats which is at an elevation of 825m.
    Creekside is at 650m

    The top of the Dave Murray is 1680m.
    I thought men's Olympic downhills had to be at least a 1,000 meter descent?

    edit: answering my own question. According to this the vertical must be 800-1000 meters.

  24. #324
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,131
    Is it just me or did the snowboard cross chick seem high in her post race interview? Second coming of Rebagliatti? Maybe she's just french?

  25. #325
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    6,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Woodlandclown View Post
    if the course is giving snowbaords this much trouble, they better alter it a lot or there are going to be many ski cross injuries.
    Last year on mostly the same course the ski cross guys loved it. One of the more technical and fast paced courses on the circuit.

    I'll be on the course as of tomorrow so I will be able to inform on what gets changed and how the guys like it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •