http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14999
i predict its pricey
Printable View
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14999
i predict its pricey
FUCK. Anyone want to buy a slightly used 1Dmk2N in april?Quote:
Originally Posted by grapedrink
damn, 10fps with a 110 burst.....
oops, forgot this link
http://www.robgalbraith.com/public_f...hite_Paper.pdf
wowowow... i'd still rather have a 5d for the full frame sensor... call me crazy...
so how much money do i need to dream about having now? equipment like that makes me wish i still were a photog for a living so i could justify spending that much $$$
$4k
I can't wait to see the first rich Japanese tourist using the liveview mode like a gigantic P&S :FIREdevil
Droool! :eek:
1D atleast is 1.3x not 1.6x
Entirely new 10.1 Megapixel Canon CMOS Sensor (APS-H size, 1.3x lens conversion factor), featuring the EOS Integrated Cleaning System
World's fastest digital SLR: shooting up to 10 fps (frames per second), with a burst rate up to 110 full-resolution JPEG images or 30 RAW images
All new high-precision AF system with 19 user-selectable AF points and 26 additional "assist points"; superior low-light performance and faster operation
New lighter body with enhanced weather resistance and outstanding reliability: featuring a shutter that's durability-tested to 300,000 exposures
Dual DIGIC III Image Processors working in parallel to provide up to 50% less shadow noise and superb image quality; new Highlight Tone Priority option adds control of bright highlights
Large 3.0-inch LCD monitor, featuring Live View
Fully compatible with over 50 EF lenses and a wide range of EOS System accessories
thats a sick camera. :eek:
http://www.usa.canon.com/app/images/...eature_03a.jpg
:eek: :eek: :eek:
I like that they're using ski racing shots on the screen in the promo materials.
haaaaaaaa... good call... a bit wrong, but a funny call nonethelessQuote:
Originally Posted by cj001f
Daddy likes. I was just wondering about this body as I'm gonna be looking for a sealed camera pretty soon.
MSRP of $4000 apparently.
I'll be selling a like new 1Dmk2n the day the mk3 is released for a hell of a lot less than $4k if anyone is interested.Quote:
Originally Posted by Free Range Lobster
I might have to say goodbye to the nikon mount for that one...
Quote:
Originally Posted by bklyn
You would have to get used to the feel of taking pictures with a brick...but it just might be worth it.
frankly i miss the solid feeling of my EOS-3 + PB-E2... felt so much more substantial than a dinky little 20D... otoh 20D is much nicer to hike with.
c'mon 40D with 7FPS...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summit
Canon is upping the ante with the MkIII. If the rest of their product line follows suit, you just might get your wish.
I had a 10D back in the day;) and I always liked the feel. But for the last 6 months I have had a Nikon D200. The other day I picked up my friend's 30D and it just felt dead compared to the D200. I think Canon has blown away any notion I had of staying with Nikon though. I like long exposures too much and I avoid using a flash if at all possible. iso6400:eek: !!!
Agreed. I'm holding out for the 40D as well (hopefully) it will make a great upgrade.Quote:
Originally Posted by Summit
-fool
personally, i'm holding out for a full-frame that's half the price of the 5d... and i'd like it to come on the market before i'm 80 years old... please canon... hear my cries... i hate the crop... it's of no use to me :(Quote:
Originally Posted by fool
screw buying a new body, my 20D suffices just fine.
my wish list right now is the 16-35 f/2.8L, 35mm f/1.4L and maybe an 85mm, don't know which flavor yet, though.
i did a portrait shoot last weekend with my camera and a relative's lenses (of which the 16-35mm and 35mm are included), and you can definitely notice the difference between those and my 70-200mm f/4.0L - all L glass, but still a noticeable difference.
a tilt shift would be nice too.
damn. now i'm sad.
why buy a 16-35 2.8 L for the 20D when you can get a 17-55 2.8 IS for about the same price? I'll sell you my 17-35mm L 2.8 USM if you want now that I have a 17-55
buy a lensbaby for a TS... cheap http://www.lensbabies.com/
now a 1DsMark III would be nice. nice and 'spensive.
seconded on the 40D w/ 7fps being very money.
thanks for linking that TS, never seen those before.Quote:
Originally Posted by Summit
and as for the 17-35, i'm on a shoestring budget, so unless you're willing to let it go for a ridiculously low price, well...let me know.
edit: i will admit however after looking at the MTF charts for both the 16-35 and 17-55 EF-S, the 17-55 has very good numbers when it's wide open.
just to clarify, a lensbaby is not a replacement for a tilt/shift... it's a different beast with a different purpose... i can see how their purposes could overlap for certain applications, but for others it would not work well at all... just something to keep in mind... it's definitely a fun lens but shouldn't be considered a cheaper replacement for a dedicated TS...Quote:
Originally Posted by Summit
this is true. lensbaby doesnt offer as much control as TS does (its really more of a tilt/swing kinda lens with incidental shift/rise/fall) you don't get independent adjustment... but then it doesnt cost $1000 like the canon TSEs and the canon TSE's are limited in their movements as well.
If you *REALLY* need a lot of TS stuff for architecture... maybe a 4x5 is in your future? or maybe a hassie flexbody or arcbody?
i would mainly be using it for portraiture - manipulating depth of field, etc.
Funny how a thread about the possibly highest tech piece of photo equipment got shifted to be about one of the lowest tech.
About the 1DIII, it sure seems like a fine piece of camera. That the photographer now can self tune the AF for each lense is a great improvement (that do highlight some shortcomings of AF systems).
It will be interesting to follow the pricing of htis camera and also what is does do prices of used 1DII, 5D etc. I'll be holding on to my 1DII for a while though.