http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14999
i predict its pricey
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14999
i predict its pricey
damn, 10fps with a 110 burst.....
Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy
oops, forgot this link
http://www.robgalbraith.com/public_f...hite_Paper.pdf
wowowow... i'd still rather have a 5d for the full frame sensor... call me crazy...
so how much money do i need to dream about having now? equipment like that makes me wish i still were a photog for a living so i could justify spending that much $$$
Originally Posted by blurred
$4k
I can't wait to see the first rich Japanese tourist using the liveview mode like a gigantic P&S![]()
Elvis has left the building
Droool!![]()
1D atleast is 1.3x not 1.6x
Entirely new 10.1 Megapixel Canon CMOS Sensor (APS-H size, 1.3x lens conversion factor), featuring the EOS Integrated Cleaning System
World's fastest digital SLR: shooting up to 10 fps (frames per second), with a burst rate up to 110 full-resolution JPEG images or 30 RAW images
All new high-precision AF system with 19 user-selectable AF points and 26 additional "assist points"; superior low-light performance and faster operation
New lighter body with enhanced weather resistance and outstanding reliability: featuring a shutter that's durability-tested to 300,000 exposures
Dual DIGIC III Image Processors working in parallel to provide up to 50% less shadow noise and superb image quality; new Highlight Tone Priority option adds control of bright highlights
Large 3.0-inch LCD monitor, featuring Live View
Fully compatible with over 50 EF lenses and a wide range of EOS System accessories
thats a sick camera.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Last edited by Free Range Lobster; 02-22-2007 at 07:26 AM.
The only thing worse than the feeling that you are going to die is the realization that you probably won't.
I like that they're using ski racing shots on the screen in the promo materials.
Daddy likes. I was just wondering about this body as I'm gonna be looking for a sealed camera pretty soon.
MSRP of $4000 apparently.
The only thing worse than the feeling that you are going to die is the realization that you probably won't.
I might have to say goodbye to the nikon mount for that one...
I'm just a simple girl trying to make my way in the universe...
I come up hard, baby but now I'm cool I didn't make it, sugar playin' by the rules
If you know your history, then you would know where you coming from, then you wouldn't have to ask me, who the heck do I think I am.
frankly i miss the solid feeling of my EOS-3 + PB-E2... felt so much more substantial than a dinky little 20D... otoh 20D is much nicer to hike with.
c'mon 40D with 7FPS...
Originally Posted by blurred
Canon is upping the ante with the MkIII. If the rest of their product line follows suit, you just might get your wish.
I had a 10D back in the dayand I always liked the feel. But for the last 6 months I have had a Nikon D200. The other day I picked up my friend's 30D and it just felt dead compared to the D200. I think Canon has blown away any notion I had of staying with Nikon though. I like long exposures too much and I avoid using a flash if at all possible. iso6400
!!!
screw buying a new body, my 20D suffices just fine.
my wish list right now is the 16-35 f/2.8L, 35mm f/1.4L and maybe an 85mm, don't know which flavor yet, though.
i did a portrait shoot last weekend with my camera and a relative's lenses (of which the 16-35mm and 35mm are included), and you can definitely notice the difference between those and my 70-200mm f/4.0L - all L glass, but still a noticeable difference.
a tilt shift would be nice too.
damn. now i'm sad.
"...And my quarter is ruined. My business lost about 200K in revenue.
On a positive note, I did save some money on car insurance by staying with GEICO..."
why buy a 16-35 2.8 L for the 20D when you can get a 17-55 2.8 IS for about the same price? I'll sell you my 17-35mm L 2.8 USM if you want now that I have a 17-55
buy a lensbaby for a TS... cheap http://www.lensbabies.com/
Originally Posted by blurred
now a 1DsMark III would be nice. nice and 'spensive.
seconded on the 40D w/ 7fps being very money.
thanks for linking that TS, never seen those before.
and as for the 17-35, i'm on a shoestring budget, so unless you're willing to let it go for a ridiculously low price, well...let me know.
edit: i will admit however after looking at the MTF charts for both the 16-35 and 17-55 EF-S, the 17-55 has very good numbers when it's wide open.
Last edited by The Jackamo; 02-24-2007 at 02:12 AM.
"...And my quarter is ruined. My business lost about 200K in revenue.
On a positive note, I did save some money on car insurance by staying with GEICO..."
just to clarify, a lensbaby is not a replacement for a tilt/shift... it's a different beast with a different purpose... i can see how their purposes could overlap for certain applications, but for others it would not work well at all... just something to keep in mind... it's definitely a fun lens but shouldn't be considered a cheaper replacement for a dedicated TS...
Bookmarks