Hey. Don't call him a dimwit.
Printable View
I don't always read them but I feel it's important to not live in a vacuum and that I should have some idea of what is going on in the minds of people in my community. I know not everyone thinks that way but I also understand how fast misinformation spreads.
Maybe because it's a passthrough city on the way up from CA to Tri'Cities/Spokane. Lot of truckers and other travelers.
It's also a way into Washington from Boise.
Virus's are different than Bacteria, you can goggle it
while there are good and bad bacteria
I don't think there are any good virus's
if you 6 ft distance you don't need a mask so much but
mostly try and stay out of confined spaces with people
don't touch yer face & wash yer hands more especialy when you get home
I'm not sure either side has anything to brag about.
“When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.” GK Chesterton
FIFY
Theantiseptics that kill viruses mostly kill bacteria, so in trying to kill viruses you kill bacteria as well. So it is not an unreasonable question. Fortunately there is no harm in killing the skin bacteria on a limited part of your body. Now if you started to do bleach enemas to kill the viruses in your bowel, you'd kill the good bacteria in there as well. But no one would be stupid enough to do that. Would they?
Don't stick bleach up your butt.
Check this out: https://www.sciencealert.com/not-all...tective-effect
Along with that, 2 seconds of Googling will show you how bacteria DO wage war against viruses. We're a throwing a lot out of whack by over sanitizing the crap out of everything.
Sure, it's good to practice cleanliness, good hand washing, etc., but our society has gone WAAAAAAAAAY overboard lately. Make way for the superbugs, folks!
Sent from my Pixel 3 using TGR Forums mobile app
You seem exceptionally knowledgable. Just so we can all level-set, where would you place yourself on this graph?
Attachment 328129
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-pers...sed-sound-data
Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy backs up their analysis with studies while the CDC backs up their guidelines with... nothing but feel good virtue signaling.
"Sweeping mask recommendations—as many have proposed—will not reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, as evidenced by the widespread practice of wearing such masks in Hubei province, China, before and during its mass COVID-19 transmission experience earlier this year. Our review of relevant studies indicates that cloth masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as PPE."
"Kellogg,21 seeking a reason for the failure of cloth masks required for the public in stopping the 1918 influenza pandemic, found that the number of cloth layers needed to achieve acceptable efficiency made them difficult to breathe through and caused leakage around the mask. We found no well-designed studies of cloth masks as source control in household or healthcare settings."
"In sum, given the paucity of information about their performance as source control in real-world settings, along with the extremely low efficiency of cloth masks as filters and their poor fit, there is no evidence to support their use by the public or healthcare workers to control the emission of particles from the wearer."
"In sum, wearing surgical masks in households appears to have very little impact on transmission of respiratory disease. One possible reason may be that masks are not likely worn continuously in households. These data suggest that surgical masks worn by the public will have no or very low impact on disease transmission during a pandemic.
There is no evidence that surgical masks worn by healthcare workers are effective at limiting the emission of small particles or in preventing contamination of wounds during surgery."
Not worth re-quoting as people will take the whole stupid article out of context. Just read this ...
https://medium.com/@Cancerwarrior/co...e-280e08ceee71
Save sane people the clicks: one guy posted an article with nothing to do about hand washing - rather the great insight that there are beneficial bacteria and viruses
The other guy posted an out of date article about 2 months old (4/1) highlighting that at that time there's no evidence for wide-spread use of cloth-masks as effective PERSONAL prevention.
Do you have a local FB page where trumpsters are telling older folks the go fuck themselves? I do and I'm sure you have a good portion of your neighbors think the same way. They are following the lead from the WH. Owning the libs is job one for those pos people. So it's time to concentrate on what we can control. We know as much about the virus as we do about avalanches. We're in high consequence avy terrain with yahoo's making ski cuts above us. Our safety depends on our ability to avoid getting caught.
I saw a cellphone tracing vid that showed cellphones going from Tyson in Iowa to SE Washington state. Avy danger is at Extreme for a while. Safe route selection in key to survival. Maybe time for a new method of securing your animal needs for a while?