meatdrink nice choice on binders, mix match=gangstar
Printable View
meatdrink nice choice on binders, mix match=gangstar
An off center mount is definitely the shop's issue. Every single shop tech, from the dumbest to the smartest, is taught to measure the jig/mount point from the tip and/or tail. Unfortunately it looks like you got had by a first year shop kid. Sorry man, total buzz kill.
Iggy- Thanks for the info from some with experience in ski construction.
A-Dad- I'll see what I can do.
anybody weigh them?
I'm just being a jerk. I'm critical of general cap construction because it ushered in a wave of mass-produced, cheaply built skis. I guess you could say, I'm wary of it. When cap construction first came on the scene, it was billed as a revolutionary new concept when it was actually a way to more cheaply manufacture skis and snowboards.
Sorry for my jerkiness :redface:
^^^ I feel the same way about the traditional cap ski. I was working in a shop when things went from all torsion box to nothing but caps. Pain in the butt to rebuild damaged sidewalls. But by that time, Salomon had been buiding their monocoque skis for years and personally I think it is a big distinction. For those that dont know, a cap ski is just a smaller torsion box ski with the edges spaced out a bit from the torsion box and then a cap placed over it. The cap actually transmits very little energy to the edges. A monocoque ski is different in that the thing that looks like a cap is actually structural. It is really hard to picture, but if you have ever held just the cosmetic cap from a ski and the top of a monocoque ski the difference is amazing. Picture the difference between a piece of sheetmetal vs. an I-beam.
Now back to your regularly scheduled thread about Rocker 2s. BTW anyone skied them since last night :D
^^^ Nope. One more way to look at it. With a cap, you build a torsion box, put edges on it and then lay a cover over it. With monocoque, you build the cover and then layup the ski inside of it. But there is a downside to this, it is really tempting to build the cover and then fill it with foam since it is easy. Unfortunately Salomon has done that on a few occasions and turned out torsionally stiff noodles :nonono2:
[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLZGhYLgVqA&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube - Mike Douglas presents the Rocker 2[/nomedia]
here's how to explain it.
Yea they did... as well as 1080s. But those skis did not last. Your rarely see them on the hill anymore. You see plenty of Explosivs, Seth pistols and other iconic skis from that generation, but not the sollys.
I have the 02 1080s, the year before they went monocoque and foam, still flex like they are brand new even though they are beat. My buddy has 05 1080s that will keep any shape you flex them into...
Me want! So what are these selling for in the few shops that are carrying them?
So is the Czar dead? If these float, carve and spin better than the Czar are we going to see something new in the 105-115 range?
Comor in Whistler. Went back today & they said they'd remount onto a fresh ski.
RRP: $950 but Comor & Salomon Store are selling them for $850
EDIT: Stoked to have news skis with aligned bindings. Can't wait to test these bad boys out.
^^^ opportunity for a vancouver mag to get shop form pricing or better on minty once drilled skis:p
The Rocker2 isn’t going to officially be released until next year, around November 2012. If you’re lucky, or have mad skills, you could get one of the roughly 30 pairs in the U.S this season; I would assume the number of Rocker2’s may increase as the season goes on, as more people will get them for testing.
Think it's this one: http://www.salomon.com/us/product/minim-down-m.html