No longer a surprise - I'm a transsexual maggot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leroy jenkins

Not ironic, someone is just very confused.


We're all confused in our own ways, and this is not a judgment or condemnation, but regardless of whether this is a troll or not, I just cannot believe all that crap about "being who you really are". Who you really are is a man baby. You can grow some tits and get your man bits chopped off, and wear makeup, but deep down inside, you're still a man. You'll never have a period, you'll never get preggers, and you'll never be a woman.

When you look at yourself naked you'll see a medical imitation of the female form. I don't think that's who anyone really is.

But its your life, and I guess you're not hurting anyone, so i don't really care. I just don't believe and accept that this is real rock bottom truth, for anyone.

---

Your last paragraph is most important, but I don't agree that Obvious (or anyone else born biologically a man) is necessarily, "deep down inside," a man. I was born biologically a man and I identify with that, but I can imagine someone born biologically a man who doesn't, who identifies with the biology of a woman. Perhaps that person can't have a period or get pregnant, but there are other aspects of female biology that they can attain. And attaining those, for that person, does, in fact, seem to me like them being more who they are.

well, now that i know who the maggot behind "obvious" is, it's funny to realize that I've always (in my very limited online dealings with them) thought that the maggot was a "her". so, in my mind, there is no change...

see, it's all relative. just like motion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by f2f

well, now that i know who the maggot behind "obvious" is, it's funny to realize that I've always (in my very limited online dealings with them) thought that the maggot was a "her". so, in my mind, there is no change...

see, it's all relative. just like motion.

---

Getting to know yourself now?

You gonna play the I "know who it is but I'm not gonna tell cuz I'm a douche too" game? Rad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blurred

Getting to know yourself now?

You gonna play the I "know who it is but I'm not gonna tell cuz I'm a douche too" game? Rad.

---

deal with it, homeboy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by f2f

deal with it, homeboy.

---

First you wack your weiner off, then you brag about it on TGR. Wht's next? Springer?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leroy jenkins

You'll never have a period, you'll never get preggers, and you'll never be a woman.

---

Tell that to your grandma! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by woodstocksez

Your last paragraph is most important, but I don't agree that Obvious (or anyone else born biologically a man) is necessarily, "deep down inside," biologically a man. I was born biologically a man and I identify with that, but I can imagine someone born biologically a man who doesn't, who identifies with the biology of a woman. Perhaps that person can't have a period or get pregnant, but there are other aspects of female biology that they can attain. And attaining those, for that person, does, in fact, seem to me like them being more who they are.

---

I believe you can identify with the social constructs of what the common "idea" of a woman is (heck, in plenty of ways I do, I value sensitivity and thoughtfulness and empathy and all that), but that's just a cultural thing. Even if you think you identify with the biology of a woman, you're identifying with your IDEA of that biology which again, is a social construct. Even after an operation, someone born a man still can't experience what its like to be a woman, they can only see what its like to be what a doctor's closest imitation is.

I don't hate or judge anyone for this though, and I also don't feel like a dick for saying it. If the op (assuming this is real) is bothered by my comments (and it probably isn't) maybe they should rethink this whole thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jm2e

Tell that to your grandma! :D

---

i wasn't there at the time, but I heard my grandma did in fact get preggers. If not, I guess I'm a little lost as to the nature of procreation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leroy jenkins

Even after an operation, someone born a man still can't experience what its like to be a woman, they can only see what its like to be what a doctor's closest imitation is.

---

it's not as simple, unfortunately. especially now that there's a ton of chemicals in everything we eat, drink and breathe, that have unknown long term effects... for example, it's estimated that more than 200,000 boys have been born as girls in Europe post WWII due to agricultural pesticides used in farming (no link, sorry, it was a recent article).

furthermore, some scary things like the following are just emerging:

http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage...20into%20girls

Some cosmetics and soap used by pregnant women have the potential to "feminise" male foetuses during the formative stage in the womb.
...
Prof Richard Sharpe, a leading researcher at Britain’s Medical Research Council, says hormone-disrupting chemicals are also linked to soaring rates of birth defects, testicular cancer and falling sperm counts. The chemical cocktails block the male sex hormone testosterone, or mimic the female sex hormone oestrogen.

or:

http://joe.endocrinology-journals.or...tract/36/4/347

Treatment of pregnant rats with an anti-androgen from the 13th day of pregnancy resulted in female organogenesis of the mammary glands, including the formation of nipples in the male foetuses and feminization of other male sexual characters.

i'm afraid we may not be even scratching the surface of the harmful effects of substance X (for any X invented in the industrialized world) on foetuses and newborns.

so, if chernobil in 1986 caused me to be born with an extra arm, should i be denied the operation to get rid of it? (not that TG can be oversimplified like this, of course)

Hey leroy, you should read Middlesex by Geoffrey Eugenides. It's a great book, I think you'd find it interesting.

If you guys knew anything about biology, you would know that after conception that we all basically start off as females. It's the addition of testosterone after the formation of the gonads in the mothers womb that "changes" us to males....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by f2f

it's not as simple, unfortunately. especially now that there's a ton of chemicals in everything we eat, drink and breathe, that have unknown long term effects... for example, it's estimated that more than 200,000 boys have been born as girls in Europe post WWII due to agricultural pesticides used in farming (no link, sorry, it was a recent article).

furthermore, some scary things like the following are just emerging:

http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage...20into%20girls

Some cosmetics and soap used by pregnant women have the potential to "feminise" male foetuses during the formative stage in the womb.
...
Prof Richard Sharpe, a leading researcher at Britain’s Medical Research Council, says hormone-disrupting chemicals are also linked to soaring rates of birth defects, testicular cancer and falling sperm counts. The chemical cocktails block the male sex hormone testosterone, or mimic the female sex hormone oestrogen.

or:

http://joe.endocrinology-journals.or...tract/36/4/347

Treatment of pregnant rats with an anti-androgen from the 13th day of pregnancy resulted in female organogenesis of the mammary glands, including the formation of nipples in the male foetuses and feminization of other male sexual characters.

i'm afraid we may not be even scratching the surface of the harmful effects of substance X (for any X invented in the industrialized world) on foetuses and newborns.

so, if chernobil in 1986 caused me to be born with an extra arm, should i be denied the operation to get rid of it? (not that TG can be oversimplified like this, of course)

---

Fascinating information !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leroy jenkins

I just cannot believe all that crap about "being who you really are". Who you really are is a man baby.

---

Well, of course you can't because you feel like and are genetically a man. I can't really imagine myself being sexually attracted to men either, but I still accept that there are men who are.

What if this person was a woman who wanted to be a man?
Or is it better to remain silent and lead a life of quiet desperation?
Scary stuff, huh?

People are people. I'll take the nice, quiet, considerate people of any persuasion over those projecting their subjective superiority any day. I know who it is, too, and have wished this maggot all the best in finding a joyful life beyond the desperation of a conflicting identity crisis within themselves.

Plus, the responses in this thread are so much more interesting than 98% of the dear diary crap that gets posted here on any given day.

Go do your thing and dismiss anyone who judges. Live the life you want to live. You're not hurting anyone and those who are think you are just aren't comfortable in their own skin. Don't let someone like Leroy and his "instincts" and lack of scientific or social knowledge get in your way.






and hayduke is just playing, I have a pick of him and his brother that shows he's just as much of a "sexual deviant" as anyone!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The AD

Well, of course you can't because you feel like and are genetically a man. I can't really imagine myself being sexually attracted to men either, but I still accept that there are men who are.

---

See, I'm willing to believe that there are homos who are legitimately attracted to the same sex, and are born that way, and that it is natural for them.

But a man who wants to BE a woman, I just think its all about society's idea of what a woman is.

i wonder what the clownfish society's idea of a gender is...

The Genus Amphiprion includes clownfish, damselfish, and anemone fish. These fish are protandrous. They first develop into males, and then potentially to females. In fact, these fish begin life as gender neutral fish, or neuters that live in communities around sea anemones. The communites include the large, dominant female, a smaller male, and then several "neuters." If something should happen to the female, the male transforms into a female to replace her, and a neuter will transform to replace the male.

MIT called, Leroy.
You've been offered a honorary doctorate in androgyne genetics.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by f2f

i wonder what the clownfish society's idea of a gender is...

The Genus Amphiprion includes clownfish, damselfish, and anemone fish. These fish are protandrous. They first develop into males, and then potentially to females. In fact, these fish begin life as gender neutral fish, or neuters that live in communities around sea anemones. The communites include the large, dominant female, a smaller male, and then several "neuters." If something should happen to the female, the male transforms into a female to replace her, and a neuter will transform to replace the male.

---

Finding Nemo won't ever be the same for me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by f2f

i wonder what the clownfish society's idea of a gender is...

The Genus Amphiprion includes clownfish, damselfish, and anemone fish. These fish are protandrous. They first develop into males, and then potentially to females. In fact, these fish begin life as gender neutral fish, or neuters that live in communities around sea anemones. The communites include the large, dominant female, a smaller male, and then several "neuters." If something should happen to the female, the male transforms into a female to replace her, and a neuter will transform to replace the male.

---

How is this relevant? I mean, its interesting, but its a natural phenomenon. There are frogs that can change sex as well. The difference is, these animals just change their sex, they don't start wearing the clothes usually associated with that sex, and start behaving in a way that sex is "supposed" to behave. They also don't have a doctor try and make them into the opposite sex. The whole point of those species doing that is to aid in procreation, the biological root of sex. All that is most definitely "natural". Human beings just don't have that ability, and what obvious is doing has nothing to do with procreation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splat

People are people. I'll take the nice, quiet, considerate people of any persuasion over those projecting their subjective superiority any day.

---

Well said Splat.

Like Leroy, I also think this may come down to societal ideas about gender, but guess what I don't really care. I may not understand this person's desires, but it's their desire and I'm cool with that. It has to be a pretty strong desire to want endure the shit that will inevitably follow. Pardon the unintentional pun here, but it really takes some balls to admit this and talk about it, under the guise of an alias or not. Especially to people in this person's real non-TGR life. So rock on and good luck with everything.

I also know who the person is and have wished them well in dealing with this.
Civil discussions about touchy subjects should be an acceptable part of being a human being. I do not feel that the person in question has been anything but civil and never tried to jam any opinions down anyone's throat. I think for the most part we've all been pretty good about respecting this and doing the same. Accepting and agreeing are two very different things.

Sure the original post may be a bit self serving and honestly why should any of us care? Guess what, so are 90% of the other posts on this site (especially padded room). When it comes down to it, do I really care that Blurred saw something funny on a poker forum or that Montanskier has a thing for Robin Meade? Nope, but they were both entertaining reads. This thread has led to some interesting discussions and has hopefully show the OP that this is something they can work through and that ultimately most people will be accepting of their choices.

Lets all just live our lives and let others live their lives too, the world will be a better place. This does not mean one has to give up their opinions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by f2f

it's not as simple, unfortunately. especially now that there's a ton of chemicals in everything we eat, drink and breathe, that have unknown long term effects... for example, it's estimated that more than 200,000 boys have been born as girls in Europe post WWII due to agricultural pesticides used in farming (no link, sorry, it was a recent article).

furthermore, some scary things like the following are just emerging:

http://www.eastandard.net/InsidePage...20into%20girls

Some cosmetics and soap used by pregnant women have the potential to "feminise" male foetuses during the formative stage in the womb.
...
Prof Richard Sharpe, a leading researcher at Britain’s Medical Research Council, says hormone-disrupting chemicals are also linked to soaring rates of birth defects, testicular cancer and falling sperm counts. The chemical cocktails block the male sex hormone testosterone, or mimic the female sex hormone oestrogen.

or:

http://joe.endocrinology-journals.or...tract/36/4/347

Treatment of pregnant rats with an anti-androgen from the 13th day of pregnancy resulted in female organogenesis of the mammary glands, including the formation of nipples in the male foetuses and feminization of other male sexual characters.

i'm afraid we may not be even scratching the surface of the harmful effects of substance X (for any X invented in the industrialized world) on foetuses and newborns.

so, if chernobil in 1986 caused me to be born with an extra arm, should i be denied the operation to get rid of it? (not that TG can be oversimplified like this, of course)

---

Huh, well that's disturbing. Poor poor people. It appears things for them have become very muddled, but in hearing about transgenders, I still see most of them focusing on social constructs of behavior and dress more than biology. No matter what they say or claim, if their focus is on societal norms and a popular idea of how the sexes should behave, then I have to believe that they are just confused. If they'd grown up in a vastly different culture, I still be most of them wouldn't have these same ideas about their supposed identity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RootSkier

Hey leroy, you should read Middlesex by Geoffrey Eugenides. It's a great book, I think you'd find it interesting.

---

I'll check it out.

If Obvious ends up looking like Robin Meade I'll pay for Bklyn to fly wherever needed to play with her boobies.

Gender identity change is certainly nothing new... personally I don't have a stake in this issue or what two (or more! lol) consenting adults decide to do sexually. Some of the things these people are going through, I don't understand nor can I relate to. I don't see their changes as a threat to who I am or my way of life. I think it's much healthier for all of us to be able to express who we truly are rather than trying to fit into an ideal of 'normal' that all of us would find confining in one way or another.

Leroy, (man, you sure did ruin a great joke choosing that as your username) the ability to bear children is not the be-all end-all definition of femininity. Many women will never bear children and your narrow definition would exclude every pre-pubescent girl. I am always surprised at the unsettling effect people with non-traditional views on sex and gender have on others. What about them makes people so uncomfortable?

This came up last week and it's interesting to see a woman enlist in the civil war and continue to live her whole life afterward as a man. That must have been a lonely road to travel at that time.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=104452266
http://media.npr.org/programs/wesun/...jennie_200.jpg

Quote:

---

Albert D.J. Cashier was the shortest soldier in the 95th Illinois Infantry. In one of the few existing photographs of Cashier during the Civil War, you can faintly detect the outline of breasts under his uniform.

But that's if you're looking for it. And the military apparently was not. "They didn't conduct physical exams in those days, the way the military does now," says Rodney Davis, a retired professor of history at Knox College in Galesburg, Ill. "What they were looking for was warm bodies."

Jennie Hodgers, masquerading as Cashier, marched thousands of miles during the war. She was at the Siege of Vicksburg and the surrender of Mobile. Her regiment took part in more than 40 skirmishes and battles.

"Albert Cashier seems to have been in [the war] from the beginning to the end," Davis says. "She stuck it out."

---

Wtf? I've got a boner. Is that right??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bklyn

...personally I don't have a stake in this issue or what two (or more! lol) consenting adults decide to do sexually...

---

Oh sure, but when it comes to what one consenting adult does sexually, then you get a little weirded out?

j/k :wink: