Currently looking for a job so I can even get on the mountain. I'll have to see. Was hoping to land one in SLC but it's not looking too hot before the ski season! If I pick something up I'll let you know!
Printable View
Interesting comments here. I think terrain plays an important role. A few years ago it was brought to my attention that I ski faster in tight New England terrain on the reverse and smeary shapes. I think that’s because I can shut it down fast if I need to, jump over or around stuff easily and they accelerate with that frictionless feel out of the turn in softer snow. But to just mach through stuff takes a lot more finesse and balance and I find I really need to have my eyes down the hill and plan my turns in advance.
I’m 5’7’’ and when I was fatter and weighed closer to two bills the 194 Devastator was pretty great at all of the above, but I found they took a ton of energy to ski a few days in a row on and would really wear me out.
I'd give my right nut for a 194 R110, just saying.
You know you can "reserve a pair" of 193, right? Clicking that button and making a reservation helps him build a reference for a future press. You're not gonna lose any money. But clicking Reserve helps him gauge next year's pressings.
It also helps him gauge design. You should participate in that. No other ski manufacturer interacts with the buyer like that.
Re sizing the FR110 discussion above….
My 180 FR110’s are mounted 84cm from tail which is -5.8cm on the 180’s 179.6cm straight pull.
I’m 5’7”, 170 lbs, short bsl.
I like mounts from -3.5 to -7.0cm.
I do not get freeride skis with -10 to 11cm mounts. I’ve tried many times. I do have Head SuperShape e-Titans for groomer days mounted at -11cm which do make sense to me.
Anyways, if I had to pick my favorite freeride skis and lengths that I’ve kept in the quiver the last few years that I really like and make sense to me are the 184 4FRNT Ravens/Hojis/Rens, and skis like the 180 Season Aero (179cm straight pull).
But then I got on the FR110…
Can’t say enough how “good” the 180 FR110 feels on my feet. It’s like the skis become an extension of my legs. Power but with instant maneuverability? “Video game feeling” is an appropriate description. You won’t ski like a regular human. You’re in the game.
IMO the FR110 is really a heavier, stiffer, faster, quicker, slarvier, better Hoji?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...9f4cdde7e5.jpg
I think this is the way
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Attachment 502679Attachment 502680
Rocker profile of FL105, BC105, FR110 and OG Metal Katana.
The FR has way more rocker and is a totally different ski. I haven't seen or tried a R110, but think the rocker profile will be closer (but still a totally different ski). I have a R105 on order and from what arild has posted about that I think will be the most similar.
Will do!
Like SkiJitsu said, they are different skis. FR110 has a lot more rocker and a more progressive mount position. That being said, I was impressed with the FR110s precision on soft groomers after skiing them back to back with Katana 108s.
I haven't skied R110s, but after reading all the info on them I think they would be a good replacement for Katana 112s.
187 beta r110 still in the outlet for a pretty solid price [emoji102] would pick up if i had the funds
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In another HL thread they just dropped the FL116 and that looks a lot closer to the OG Katana (width, flat camber, long side cut, more traditional mount). It looks a bit more pow oriented at 4mm wider and more rocker tip and tail but seems to be the closest out of all the skis.
https://heritagelabskis.com/products/fl116
Back on the topic of weight, I'm trying to decide between a 180 or 186 for reserving/once they're back in stock. Skis I have experience with: 184 wildcat 108 which I wish was a bit more stable, I think the weight/bamboo will fix this for either. 184 Raven, I like in the backcountry snow but when I bring to resort for sidecountry feels like it requires a ton of work and makes my feet sore, likely more binding/weight but makes me think I may want a longer ski for reverse camber. 184 BG ASYM I like these alot but they do feel a bit long sometimes. Really not sure if the 180 will feel too short of edge or will be fine once I figure out how to ski them or if the 186 while being my longest ski will feel shorter due to the shorter effective edge.
Should add I'm 5'10" 150.
is the beta any different from the production 110?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
5'10, about 180. 186FR and impatiently waiting on a 181 R.
So the main thing is the tail doesn't have much kick to it, so the ski is a little more sensitive to mount position vs the production ski.
The Beta will mount -8 to -8.75 really nicely, where the Beta is going to be awesome between -6.5 to about -8. I'd say for folks looking to replace the OG Corvus in particular, the Beta is a great call.