Questions for shmoesmith.

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-19-2007, 11:21 PM
SkiingBear

Quote:

Originally Posted by concerned maggots

...Know that this is written only to safeguard the friends I’ve made here...

You wanna safeguard your friends? Maybe if you want to keep your friends you'll delete this...just think about what we'll all think if your board name leaks and we find out who hid behind an alias and posted this crap.

It's Shmoesmith's money, given in good faith that he'll use it as he sees fit...get over it.
02-19-2007, 11:22 PM
tromano

Quote:

Originally Posted by iceman

Z is reading my damn mind tonight, I swear.

Z seems like a really principled guy. Its simple fact whenever a person puts something out there it is opens you up to this sort of thing as well as all the other good stuff.
02-19-2007, 11:22 PM
Crass3000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Telenater

and maybe have the money committed to a trust or administered fund rather than donating a lump sum.

That's pretty silly. The man needed help on many fronts and restricting how donations were used would be pointless. I'm sure everybody agrees that money was the last thing he needed to worry about at such a tragic time.

Please delete this thread -- Please pick this time to have a little class. This is really in poor taste.

If somebody thinks that there are questions that need to be answered then ask him personally when the time is right and time has passed -- if you don't know him personally (like one of his best friends) then it's none of your business.

As for those we are defending this thread -- please at least ask the person to post under their real name. If you have the nuts to ask such a heartless question then at least have the nuts to use your own name. The person who started this thread is a coward.
02-19-2007, 11:23 PM
twodogs

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdog

Nice way to tarnish an incredible effort on everyone's part.

Seconded.. I quit the blasphemy from here on.
02-19-2007, 11:27 PM
bossass

What exactly is the point of this thread? Maybe DM was doing something immoral (which is a completely subjective concept, btw), maybe they both were. Maybe she cheated, maybe he cheated. Maybe she committed suicide cause he hurt here. Maybe vice versa. I'm not saying any of this is true, but of all the scenarios you can dream up, do any of them really matter?

Dude lost his life partner. Dude lost his will to live. They were together 7 YEARS. Even if they were on the verge of divorce, SHE PROBABLY KNEW HIM BETTER THAN ANYONE AND VICE VERSA. It's fucking tramatic. Psycologically and financially.

I don't care what Shoe does with my money. The only possible thing that could make me want it back is if we found out he murdered her, which is absurd. Having to explain this is absurd. The fact this thread exists--and that shoe will have to read all this--is absurd.
02-19-2007, 11:48 PM
phUnk

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Witherspoon

PHP Code:

<?php header('Content-type: image/gif'); readfile('img.jpg'); $filename = "logged.txt"; $somecontent = "Connection from:".$_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']." at ".date("r",time())."\n"; if ($handle = fopen($filename, 'a')) { fwrite($handle, $somecontent) fclose($handle); } ?>

Can I ask why you were logging (poorly) the address of everyone that read page two?

You could have gotten the same info with a simple embedded image, which then would have showed up in your apache logs with an IP that you could have then run hostname lookups on. Oh, and if the content type is image/gif, then don't try to feed the browser a jpg.

Also, way to keep your Sandbox directory wide open, AND to leave your phpinfo in there. :rolleyes:

Code:

Variable Value _REQUEST["RMID"] 180afb4d43f91f10 _REQUEST["RMFD"] 011FB06hO104pWs _COOKIE["RMID"] 180afb4d43f91f10 _COOKIE["RMFD"] 011FB06hO104pWs _SERVER["DOCUMENT_ROOT"] /Library/WebServer/Documents _SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT"] image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, application/x-shockwave-flash, application/vnd.ms-excel, application/vnd.ms-powerpoint, application/msword, */* _SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING"] gzip, deflate _SERVER["HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE"] en-us _SERVER["HTTP_CONNECTION"] Keep-Alive _SERVER["HTTP_COOKIE"] RMID=180afb4d43f91f10; RMFD=011FB06hO104pWs _SERVER["HTTP_HOST"] c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net _SERVER["HTTP_REFERER"] http://c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net/~Sandbox/ _SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"] Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) _SERVER["PATH"] /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/Users/Sandbox _SERVER["REMOTE_ADDR"] 24.10.251.77 _SERVER["REMOTE_PORT"] 4949 _SERVER["SCRIPT_FILENAME"] /Users/Sandbox/Sites/test.php _SERVER["SCRIPT_URI"] http://c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comc...ndbox/test.php _SERVER["SCRIPT_URL"] /~Sandbox/test.php _SERVER["SERVER_ADDR"] 67.172.227.181 _SERVER["SERVER_ADMIN"] [no address given] _SERVER["SERVER_NAME"] c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net _SERVER["SERVER_PORT"] 80 _SERVER["SERVER_SIGNATURE"] <ADDRESS>Apache/1.3.33 Server at c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net Port 80</ADDRESS> _SERVER["SERVER_SOFTWARE"] Apache/1.3.33 (Darwin) PHP/5.1.6 _SERVER["GATEWAY_INTERFACE"] CGI/1.1 _SERVER["SERVER_PROTOCOL"] HTTP/1.1 _SERVER["REQUEST_METHOD"] GET _SERVER["QUERY_STRING"] no value _SERVER["REQUEST_URI"] /~Sandbox/test.php _SERVER["SCRIPT_NAME"] /~Sandbox/test.php _SERVER["PATH_TRANSLATED"] /Users/Sandbox/Sites/test.php _SERVER["PHP_SELF"] /~Sandbox/test.php _SERVER["REQUEST_TIME"] 1171950177

edit:

ssh root@c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net
Using keyboard-interactive authentication.
Password:
Access denied
Using keyboard-interactive authentication.
Password:
Access denied
Using keyboard-interactive authentication.
Password:
Access denied
Using keyboard-interactive authentication.
Password:
Access denied
Using keyboard-interactive authentication.
Password:
Access denied

OK, I give up! :tongue:
02-19-2007, 11:57 PM
Blurred

Quote:

Originally Posted by phUnk

Also, way to keep your Sandbox directory wide open, AND to leave your phpinfo in there. :rolleyes:
[/b]

I'm surprised you were intrigued enough to quote his post to figure out what was going on. Good work.

Guess you are referring to the info contained here:

http://c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net/~Sandbox/

ps-love how you posted your history of trying to brute force him. That's L337!!
02-20-2007, 12:00 AM
phUnk

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlurredElevens

I'm surprised you were intrigued enough to quote his post to figure out what was going on. Good work.

Guess you are referring to the info contained here:

http://c-67-172-227-181.hsd1.ut.comcast.net/~Sandbox/

OH SHIT DOCROOT HONEYPOT WE BOTH GOT MAPPED!~ :rolleyes:

Goofy shit.
02-20-2007, 12:04 AM
Blurred

Quote:

Originally Posted by phUnk

OH SHIT DOCROOT HONEYPOT WE BOTH GOT MAPPED!~ :rolleyes:

Goofy shit.

Underweb mapped=us pwnzered!!! Oh teh No!!
02-20-2007, 12:06 AM
stump832

Mad psy-ops up in this piece.
02-20-2007, 12:09 AM
MeatPuppet

Quote:

Originally Posted by phUnk

[b]
Can I ask why you were logging (poorly) the address of everyone that read page two?
:

Funny David, you did this in the other thread as well.

http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...63#post1139863

So, you are keeping track of us. You don't think an explanation is in order? Maybe we found our "concerned maggots"?

I'm not normally suspicious of people, unless they give me a reason to be. What's up with this?

Edit: what do you think this thread's half life is after phUnk's super-sleuthing uncovered this?
02-20-2007, 12:12 AM
rideit

Is DW trying to figure out what happened to DW?

Freaking weird, this internet life.
02-20-2007, 12:16 AM
ill-advised strategy

I think the hardly boys just got a raging clue
02-20-2007, 12:17 AM
phUnk

Quote:

Originally Posted by stump832

Mad psy-ops up in this piece.

:rolleyes:
02-20-2007, 12:18 AM
The AD

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatPuppet

So, you are keeping track of us. You don't think an explanation is in order? Maybe we found our "concerned maggots"?

I'd think it's more likely he expects concerned maggots to post again and he'll be able to glean something when that happens.
02-20-2007, 12:22 AM
Blurred

Quote:

Originally Posted by The AD

I'd think it's more likely he expects concerned maggots to post again and he'll be able to glean something when that happens.

Well, since you let the cat out of the bag, not now. ;)

The only thing he could learn is their ip, isp, and location. Yay.
02-20-2007, 12:23 AM
Z

Quote:

Originally Posted by YetiMan

I think the hardly boys just got a raging clue

heheh. heh. heh.
02-20-2007, 12:24 AM
phUnk

Dynamic IP, probably comcast, and utah.

I'm glad we got that out in the open.
02-20-2007, 12:25 AM
MeatPuppet

hmmmm, you do have a point, it could go either way.
02-20-2007, 12:26 AM
Powow

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlurredElevens

Well, since you let the cat out of the bag, not now. ;)

The only thing he could learn is their ip, isp, and location. Yay.

He couldn't even learn that, his logging file only lists IPs, not usernames or anything else to identify the IP so he'd just have a big list of numbers and nothing else.
02-20-2007, 12:36 AM
Crass3000

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlurredElevens

The only thing he could learn is their ip, isp, and location. Yay.

So what he's doing wouldn't yeild a MAC address?

If you guys are smart enough to write that type of code is there a way to get to the MAC?
02-20-2007, 12:38 AM
phUnk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powow

He couldn't even learn that, his logging file only lists IPs, not usernames or anything else to identify the IP so he'd just have a big list of numbers and nothing else.

He could tie IPs/hostnames to the time that a username posts here

But... his script is broken and doesn't record shit

And... he'll only get one minute resolution because this forum doesn't display seconds. How many posts or views does a busy thread get in a minute? :tongue:

And... there are other faults with his approach, but fixing those is an exercise left to our little internet detective.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crass3000

So what he's doing wouldn't yeild a MAC address?

If you guys are smart enough to write that type of code is there a way to get to the MAC?

What would he do with a MAC address, even if he could get it (which, judging from his broken php shenanigans, he can't) ?

Absolutely nothing.
02-20-2007, 12:38 AM
Jer

Threw it together quick, just to start logging ASAP.

Not that many names here. Not hard to retrieve them at intervals.

Does that bother anyone?

Just looking at the IP pattern might be of some interest ... should I dump it here?

After all, anyone willing to post up here should know how trivial it is to map an IP ... anyone willing to call for all sorts of revelations and freedom of speech and public disclosure should be quite happy to do so forthrightly under their own name.

Right?
02-20-2007, 12:40 AM
rideit

what is more interesting, how did you get to post a post that had no post?
(not that we need more of that!)
02-20-2007, 12:41 AM
Powow

Quote:

Originally Posted by phUnk

He could tie IPs/hostnames to the time that a username posts here

But... his script is broken and doesn't record shit

And... he'll only get one minute resolution because this forum doesn't display seconds. How many posts or views does a busy thread get in a minute? :tongue:

And... there are other faults with his approach, but fixing those is an exercise left to our little internet detective.

You already pointed out one problem with that approach, but another is that the time someone viewed the second page is not the same as when they post, IF they post.

Quote:

So what he's doing wouldn't yeild a MAC address?

If you guys are smart enough to write that type of code is there a way to get to the MAC?

MAC address would be useless.

edit:

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Witherspoon

Threw it together quick, just to start logging ASAP.

Not that many names here. Not hard to retrieve them at intervals.

Does that bother anyone?

Just looking at the IP pattern might be of some interest ... should I dump it here?

After all, anyone willing to post up here should know how trivial it is to map an IP ... anyone willing to call for all sorts of revelations and freedom of speech and public disclosure should be quite happy to do so forthrightly under their own name.

Right?

Personally it doesn't bother me but it is sort of shady.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rideit

what is more interesting, how did you get to post a post that had no post?
(not that we need more of that!)

It had a post, the board just didn't write any text from it. You could make an empty post by posting a picture of one transparent pixel or the same blue color or whatever.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page