Amen, brudda.Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Shoelaces
:)
The topsheet is but the icing on what may prove to be a very sweet cake.
:D
Printable View
Amen, brudda.Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Shoelaces
:)
The topsheet is but the icing on what may prove to be a very sweet cake.
:D
That's an interesting point about an image spanning the two skis. I played around with these "spanning" images a lot.Quote:
Originally posted by phUnk
I Heart PMGear, but I don't dig big ass URLs in bright white letters on my skis, especially when it already says PMGear in bright white letters on the tip.
The ginormous FKNA is great. Does that create a possible problem down the road now that you have effectively created a Right and Left ski, (with warranties, or something?) <-- I'm thinking out of the box and my ass on that one.
I think the FKNA should be super subtle both visually and literally. When the skis are placed correctly, and you know what you're looking for, you see FKNA. If you're not looking for it, you just see a random pattern (kind of reminds me of winter camo). Switch the skis and you truly have a random pattern.
I was thinking of the "old woman / young woman" perceptual illusion:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/gifs/young3.gif
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/gifs/young1.jpg
Do you see and old woman or a young one?
I think twoplanker has it. #5 without the URL and binary code.
I voted for #4 but solely because I didn't want the URL on the back. If its small around the tail that's cool, but not a dominant part of the image.
Nice work, I like this bunch a lot more.
Here ya go:Quote:
Originally posted by tuffy109
flatten the black out, make "bro" in the same typeface as fkna and get rid of the url and i'll vote for it.
http://www.pmgearusa.com/bro1.3.17.jpg
Let me ask a question: I'm too close to this image now to answer objectively...
How obvious is the FKNA? When you first look at it, do you see letters or a pattern?
thinking about the FKNA in physical size i think that it's gonna take some time for people to see it. when the skis are switched so R is on the L it's gonna be totally confusing. plus add binders on top of it and it'll get more lost.
also i hate to be the one to ask this, maybe it's a way stupid question, but i'll ask anyway. i thought usually skis were made individually and then flex matched into pair. with that in mind (unless your top sheet is added after flex matching) what happens if you end up having two left skis that match in flex? again sorry if this is way stupid i'm just thinking of possible problems.
Bombers Bombers Bombers Bombers Bombers.
Yes, yes, if you have an idea, a design, throw it out there.Quote:
Originally posted by iceman
I totally agree with Brett on this. Throw it open for a week or so and see what happens. I know Optics was biting his tongue back there, you may recall he had some nice designs in the No Ka Oi comp. I'm sure others could bring it too.
Nothing against what has been shown, but more wouldn't hurt anything.
Quote:
Originally posted by BC-FLOW
also i hate to be the one to ask this, maybe it's a way stupid question, but i'll ask anyway. i thought usually skis were made individually and then flex matched into pair. with that in mind (unless your top sheet is added after flex matching) what happens if you end up having two left skis that match in flex? again sorry if this is way stupid i'm just thinking of possible problems.
Super question. Pat, who's working directly with the engineers manufacturing these skis, either knows the answer to this or can find out.
:confused:
Well, since everyone is opening up here...
DEMOCRACY IN DESIGN SUCKS!
Have been working in advertisement/design/photography for the last ten years, so i have seen it up close...
I can feel DruggedMonkeys:s pain on this behalf.
Situation is very close to this : 40 cooks making the same soup, in evitably it will be uneatable. Everybody gets to participate and no one will like the final results.
The only thing that really ( from my experince) is to design WHO designs WHAT to WHOM.
Give the basic guidelines, let the professional to do the work, do the final adjustments, print the graphics to the ski, ski.
Art isn´t made in commitees.
:)
This is a pretty sharp and simple design. A couple of thoughts:Quote:
1. Don't flaunt the "Bro" in that generic font, the original looked better. Oh yeah, can we see it (the "Bro" that is) in red (I want these babies to match my helmet)?
2. As someone else touched on, you can add a litle "PMGear" to the bottom (anyone w/ half a brain can google pmgear and get to the website) of the tail end; it'll grab attention in liftlines where a lot of people stare down and look at the backs of the skis in front of them...
couldn't say it any better than Spamhelmet
yes indeed for DM this has got to be a bitch.
i don't think that everybody on the board should get to play junior designer this time. let DM take the problem and work it into maybe two solutions then put those two out on the board and you vote one way or the other. no tweak that, change this.
it's his problem to solve so let him do his thing.
just my $.02
dunno if it's been said in this long thread, but....
FKNA is about as far away as you could get from ZEN
i agree w/ the 'chose the name then figure out the graphic' crew.
I'm really digging the latest revisions of the black FKNA model... But I feel the sharp contrast of the PMGear logo and the BroModel colouring ruin the beautiful simplicity of the black with faded gray.
So I think... faded gray on the tip logo, remove the writing from the tip, and then in the same style as the Made In USA on the Blue Bomber put the PM (Large font to go across the ski) and GEAR (in a slightly smaller font). Perhaps the font would be something clearly defined, but not quite so militaristic as the FKNA. Again, in a subtle shade such as gray. Kinda like this...
http://hosting.the-edg.net/edg/edg_remix.gif
Or just the blue bomber. If you find that design at all militaristic with negative connotations, I think DM is right in the over analysis. Sure the bomb on the yellow has violent implications, but come on - have you ever watched road runner? The only problem I had with the blue bomber was the tip design - but I don't really like that on any ski (which is why I'm quite a fan of the Jaks' look). The base colour does draw me in, but of course we're not going to have that or a FKNA so that's a bit academic really...
I think if DM would be so good as to release a v.2 of his designs (preferably a bit bigger, a la this), and maybe even a v.3 then a solution which (almost) everyone will like can be found :-) I mean, as splat has said, there is a week or so's leeway in the design process, and art was never perfected through rushing, right?
Just my hyper-elongated 2p...
edg
I have said before that I do not like bombs and voted for #5......tough.......
:confused:
the blue bomber is definitely a shock. Kids like mine olders (11-13) would kill myself to have a pair, and am sure there will be a flock like them. The blue bomber comes from a very, very talented visual artist or whatever you want to call him, and I must agree that the second series has less gut-impact than the second.
I vote for whatever J thinks is best.
I've managed and worked on enough creative projects to know that the only way to get things done is to have one person responsible for each part of the result. They are encouraged to take input, get ideas, be responsive, but at the end of the day, one person has to be responsible, and that has to be the same person who decides. And I can't think of anyone more qualified than J to make that decision.
But who makes the call for the graphic designer at PM Gear? I'm a little confused about who's running it, nowadays... Twoplanker is super involved, but I go to splats place, and there's 50 pairs of Arno Adam poles and a bunch of PM bags, and "his" guys are actually designing the skis. So who exactly is in charge? I'm sure this would help whoever hopefully gets put in charge of ski graphics design know who to answer too. ;) I agree though -- just hire somebody out to do a couple designs, and go from there. It's how most businesses do things, and for good reason.
edit: verbier-- "the blue bomber is definitely a shock." A shock?!?! That topsheet is a shock!? Have you at least looked at the recalled Rossi Scratch BC? You'd probably have a fucking heart attack. Can I live in your world? One where a frickin' PLANE on the topsheet is considered a SHOCK?! Sorry for the cynicism, but you're just blowing my mind here. It couldn't be the blue, because that's been pretty much done... ???
Hey, my english is prolly too poor!!!Quote:
edit: verbier-- "the blue bomber is definitely a shock." A shock?!?! That topsheet is a shock!? Have you at least looked at the recalled Rossi Scratch BC? You'd probably have a heart attack. Can I live in your world? One where a frickin' PLANE on the topsheet is considered a SHOCK?! Sorry for the cynicism, but you're just blowing my mind here. It couldn't be the blue, because that's been pretty much done... ???
Albeit I do not like bombs as a concept, I LIKE THE BLUE BOMBER A LOT. It's exactly the opposite of what you understood. BTW, I strongly defended the recalled scraches somewhere..... I forgot what forum it was
It's late and I'm running on zero sleep so....
Yes the M of "pmgear" is fucked. Whatever it's just an idea...
Well, I was bored and I thought it might be fun...
0001_0180.mp4 (1.1mb, Mpeg-4 decoder required)
edg
No bombs, no bullets, no planes, no lairy colours, no Bro-Bra, no US of A.
http://www.tetongravity.com/usergall...319/ls9000.jpg
For all you low-key LS9000 lovers out there... ;)
Hmmmm, a big black fat ski. That's a really good idea. We should call it something cool like "gotama" or "tanker".
This whole design thing has been a joke. You can't be designing a ski before the people that need to make decisions will actually sack-up and make a decision with regard to names and the elements used on the ski. PM Gear needs to find harmony within its own members before looking elsewhere. The first design I spent hours working on (mudflap trucker girl, per Splat direction) got shot down before even getting to here. So to be honest...to have the most success and not waste the time of the designers involved PM Gear needs to sack-up and make some decisions WITH ONE VOICE as to WTF the ski will be called and the theme of the ski. Then you can go design. [/2 cents]
How about this one:
I'd be a little worried about 'bollock hangup' when exiting a turn with that ski. Everything else is just peachy though.
Mmmm - shaved balls. :D
FKNA Bro Black ~ #5.
Drop the URL & replace it with a different logo or smaller FKNA across the tail. Side-to-side, not vertically.
edit: Doh! Kinda like edg said on page3.
JM.02 ~ None of 'em really grabbed me by the testes. #5 is the pick of the litter, but after voting I still feel like I "settled" for that design...Sorry! It's nice work, fellas - But I've seen your work in other areas & I'm confident you could crank something out that makes 90% of the collective say "Yeah - THAT'S the one."