Originally Posted by
Meadow Skipper
Well, as far as where, what do you want to protect? Buildings? Towns? Habitat for rare species? Watersheds? ‘Viewsheds?’ Even airsheds (Rx burns can release less smoke than wildfires or have it during favorable dispersion conditions)? Important industry/infrastructure (logging/grazing/mining etc.)? Categories like that tend to get prioritized, depending on local needs and/or wants.
The best alternative to Rx Fire also depends on things like the local situation and conditions and economics. Manual thinning of trees and vegetation might be appropriate, and mechanical removal means like with heavy machinery might be appropriate and workable. Grazing livestock, like goats, might work depending on the vegetation and availability. And projects to do things like replacing highly flammable or undesirable vegetation (often invasive, annual species or conifers) with less flammable things like perennial plants and hardwoods.
Sorry for the broad brush answer, but yeah, “it depends.”
One of our recent presidents has suggested raking :rolleyes2, I don’t know, maybe :D