^^^Seems to correlate strongly to stupidity, bigotry, and never getting laid..
Printable View
^^^Seems to correlate strongly to stupidity, bigotry, and never getting laid..
Attachment 459074
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Give me a sec, I'm going to post a couple maps that reinforce my opinions..
Do you view the responsibility and necessity for compromise and forming of unity to fall only on the shoulders of those you disagree with? Or is any of it your responsibility as well?
If the 'other side' are always the crazy ones, you're a part of that unproductive division as well.
Two kids killed by lighting in 2022 - https://www.weather.gov/safety/lightning_fatalities22
1,676 kids killed by guns in 2002 - https://www.verifythis.com/article/n...f-b5e3e47aa639
Can't wait for the whataboutism reply.....
Pretending that any of these sources ignore the statistical makeup that creates this mortality rate is deliberately misconstruing reality.
You are welcome to your opinion that they should be separated and dealt with separately. But the professional public health community doesn't agree with your position.
Hey fucktard, you were wrong. Why not admit it? That would help people to understand that you’re reasonable and we can have a constructive dialogue.
Apologies, that was meant for LeRoi
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Leroy still hasn’t explained his “the US is no different than any other country when it comes to gun violence” statement - so engaging him in the conversation he claims he wants to have is foolish. You can’t reason with someone who didn’t use reason themselves to form their ideas and opinions.
You keep saying "unity" like it is some magic wand that can be waved.
As shown earlier, on a number of gun control issues, a large percentage seems to support some very basic policies like universal background checks. So why are you standing in the way of completing the unity on this topic?
Gun control advocates are not the ones with the absolutist positions on this issue.
The reason for this, and in general conservatives typically be absolutists on policy debate is that by definition any compromise that a conservative makes is a loss, while a compromise is still a win for a progressive. Conservatives are attempting to conserve the way it is/was- to meet in the middle means moving further away from their stated goal. A progressive meeting in the middle is still moving towards their goal.
It's not just conservatives who have adopted the no-compromise messaging strategy.
The environmental lobby is upset at Biden for agreeing to Manchin's bill for oil/gas projects to move forward in order to secure assistance toward Biden's environmental goals.
Zero compromise is why we can't get anything done anymore. Purity testing everything.
I give Biden credit for dealing with the criticism and pursuing compromise. Manchin too.
That said, I see no particular reason why the middle should negotiate with the extreme.
That's straight up SOP. Change the argument to some strawman / red herring / technical minutiae that fit their preconceptions so they can regurgitate talking points and other spurious logic.
They don't want to answer "what's different about America?" because they have no answer.
So why do y’all keep responding to Leroy?
Do ya think you’re so eloquent you’re gonna change his mind?
Each time he posts, about five others remind him of his mental deficiency.
Thereby sending trillions if not quadrillions of electrons on a fruitless journey.
Won’t someone think of the electrons!!!???
gotta have fruit on your journey...
an 18 year old killed some old people and wounded some cops in new mexico. i'm sure that's how they wanted to go, put down by a psycho 18 year old who had no business with a gun.