My recollection is that:Quote:
Originally Posted by teledad
1. This was a frequent problem with the earlier production of that model.
2. Scarpa was replacing it for free.
3. Replacing it yourself is tricky b/c of the diameters involved.
Printable View
My recollection is that:Quote:
Originally Posted by teledad
1. This was a frequent problem with the earlier production of that model.
2. Scarpa was replacing it for free.
3. Replacing it yourself is tricky b/c of the diameters involved.
Volkl Rise Above 88 in 170 is tempting at $425 US... https://www.corbetts.com/2022-volkl-rise-above-88-skis/
Backland 78 (non-UL version) for CAD250 for anyone looking to try out skimo or a solid sping mission ski on the same site.Quote:
Originally Posted by CirqueScaler
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Great deal. I skied the non-UL 78s last year for 65 days and loved them. Only complaint was the short radius on the 163.
Yeah I had the Backland Descenders which I think is still the same ski, like 1200g in the 170. Great ski, I just didn’t like being locked into pendulum turns with the short radius.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I am lazy (or inflexible?) and don't like to have to bend over and grab the heelpiece by hand to switch between riser modes. For this reason, I don't really like my ATK RT 2.0 bindings.
What are some of the lighter bindings out there that can be fully actuated by poles? G3 zed? I mostly like my Ions on my winter setup.
Pole switching between ski mode, low, med, high risers (like Ions) would be great.
Pole switching between ski mode, med, and high risers would be acceptable.
Pole switching between only ski mode and medium riser like my RT 2.0s doesn't work for me.
Salomon MTN and ATK Raider both have 2 riser heights that you can use your pole to flip directly over the heel pins without ever rotating the heel piece. I believe the MTN is slightly lighter (brakeless version) but the ATK risers are magnetized and much easier to operate. Both are lighter than the Zed.Quote:
Originally Posted by bfree
Alpinist heels can be turned with the pole. And of course the Dynafit Speed Turn.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I have older Raiders, new C Raiders, and MTNs. Without brakes the C Raiders are the lightest, but only by like 20g or so. But their heel risers are awesome (same as the normal Raiders). Only thing that might be better on the MTNs is they are probably a bit easier to step into the toe, with the little toe stopper assist thing-a-ma-jig. And they're cheaper I think.
I just ordered some Hagan Boost 93 x 184 for a screaming deal (Hagan hooked it up!) and some ATK Trofeo Plus 10 bindings from Telemark-Pyrenees that I'll report back on after a few volcanos.
Anyone tried the Pomoca Race Pro Grip skins in warm weather? Had a race last weekend in slushy conditions (late afternoon, 50F temps), on the steeper climbs I was having to paperboy to avoid slipping. Wondering if grippier skins would help. I was running Colltex PDGs.
Can anyone recommend a touring pack in the ~35 liter size that fits long torsos well? I have a cirque 35 in size M/L and the back is I think too short for me. Touring with it makes my back and shoulders uncomfortable quickly. I have a REI flash 55 backpacking pack in L that fits great and is painless even with heavier loads and long days. I'm fine with no airbag. Good ski carry and axe carry options is a plus.
I have an 18.5" torso which is usually a medium or S/M and the BD M/L packs fit me, which makes me think they run small. The Cirque shoulder straps are also super thin and barely padded so that could contribute to the discomfort. Mystery Ranch makes L/XL size packs which are huge but not skinny ski style.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anachronist
Exped has nice roll-top options in a variety of sizes. I'm using the Black Ice 30 as my ski pack this year and last.
MR is one I hadn't looked at yet, thanks. And apparently they have a custom sizing program too, presumably for $$$$. At this point I'm game to give up some ounces on my back for a comfortable fit. Exped looks interesting as well. Probably the smart move is going somewhere that has some of these packs and just trying them on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Benneke10
Yes, good probability that anyone carrying MR will have staff that’s trained in pack fitting that will help get you fit right, which is worth pounds IMOQuote:
Originally Posted by Anachronist
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Its hard to find a good place to try on a bunch of touring packs in the same spot. My favorite current offerings are the Mammut Spindrift and Blue Ice Firecrest and I don't know of any brick and mortar shops selling those. I know Skimo Co and many other retailers offer free returns, life is a lot easier when you just order 7 or 8 things and just return all but one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anachronist
The best touring pack I've ever used is the current MR in terms of fit and functionality. It is heavy though, and not super simple so YMMV
Cross posting here from the Dalbello thread:
I'm considering the Quantum Asolo Factory or Quantum Lite to replace a pair of Alien 1.0 boots.
Reason I want to switch is the Alien rubs the ankle bone on the inside of the ankle on both my feet. It gets quite sensitive and bruised. I read the review here https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/revie...-asolo-factory which says the liner is relatively thick around the ankle and leg which I am hoping would help me.
I wear a 26.0 Alien 1.0(I couldn't make a 25.0 shell fit work on a Alien RS) and used to wear a 25.5 Sportiva Sytron.
Hearing all the feedback about sizing I figure the 26.5 would be the correct size to try first.
I'm looking to have the same downhill performance as the Alien 1.0 with more comfort and willing to sacrifice a little weight. I'd like to keep uphill performance as good as possible other than the added 200g.
Any feedback on the Lite version? Does it lose downhill performance? Is the liner too thin, reducing comfort?
It seems as though the QLS has seen some durability issues, how difficult is it to get replacement parts and the cost for those? I'm used to free replacement BOA laces and am comfortable replacing them.
I also considered the F1 LT, but I don't care for the velcro closure on the F1 and also just saw some complaints for the same issue I have on the Alien 1.0 here: https://skimo.co/scarpa-f1-lt-boots
I tried on the Quantum Asolo Factor, felt like the liner was pretty thin, standard for boots in this class. The QAF I think is the lightest "touring boot" currently available, as in not marketed towards skimo racing. Lots of people here said that they run small and are short. I felt like the 27.5 was long enough for me, and I'm 27.5 in every brand (some brands like Scarpa are too short for me in 27.5). I ultimately passed on them because they have a pretty soft flex and too much volume in the heel. You could probably take up some heel volume with a thicker liner, and folks in the Dalbello thread have had success doing that. If I find a cheap late season QAF deal I might get on it because I like the race-style transitions, super light weight and acceptable fit.
Can't comment on the ankle fit (I haven't noticed an issue there but everyone is different) but for the velcro strap issue frorider's invention might be of interest:Quote:
Originally Posted by timmaio
https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...19#post6513719
https://www.wildsnow.com/30991/elega...-the-strapoff/
Good to know your thoughts. You say they felt too soft. What are you comparing that to? I like the stiffness of the Alien 1.0(stiffer than the Sytron) and want to ensure I don't lose that in changing boots.Quote:
Originally Posted by Benneke10
How did you like the Quick Lacing System?
I want a ski mountaineering boot first and foremost. Light enough to go fast, agile enough to handle rocks and crampons well and stiff enough to ski 45*+ terrain on light 85 underfoot skis.
They are 650 right now, part of why I'm considering them.
My problem is my chicken legs, not with continual adjustment. The design on the F1 requires too much force to close and eventually wore the velcro holding power requiring a new strap. I don't think this mod fixes that problemQuote:
Originally Posted by teledad
They are pretty soft. I've tried on the Sytron as well a while back and they are probably similar to the QAF. I've tried on the Alien 1.0 and its a lot stiffer. I haven't skied either one so can only comment on carpet feel. I have a friend who skis the QAF with ZG95 and likes them, but he demoed an F1 LT earlier this season and says the Scarpas have more power.Quote:
Originally Posted by timmaio
The QLS is kind of junk. My friend broke his earlier this season, and they don't offer replacement parts. Luckily he was able to get a brand new pair of replacement boots from warranty and that pair is still going strong. It just feels clunky and less refined than boa.
I bought a pair online for something like $350 or $400 brand new in the fall. Ended up getting rid of them instead of skiing them but prices lower than 650 can be found.
I also have chicken legs and haven't had issues with the velcro strap boots I've used (Roxa RX, F1 LT, and Skorpius) other than just being annoying to have to tighten at every transition (frorider's mod doesn't work for me because I run the straps so tight). I found that the fixed leg tightness settings on the Sytron weren't nearly enough for me even on the tightest setting.
Have you tried the Pierre Gignoux Mtn? Sounds like you're the perfect customer for them
Great thoughts, thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Benneke10
That's disappointing to hear about the stiffness. I don't think I can drop back to the Sytron level of performance.
Again disappointing that they warrantied a boot over the QLS breaking. I have replaced many BOA and expect the boot to last at least 3 BOA replacements. It's also something I carry in my repair kit on multi day tours. A significant liability if it cannot be fixed in the field.
I have considered the PG Mtn idly, but never seriously. I'll have to see if I can handle them next time I'm in the EU. I have spent plenty of time around full carbon boots(my wife races on sportiva's) and I know the performance is there but the lack of lower punching makes me nervous and I'm also reticent to drop that much coin without trying on first.