fukdifikno, i found the M5 had a weird flex for me and a unpredictable reaction to tipping on edge YMMV
Printable View
Skid the m6 today in all conditions - powder, big bumps, little bumps, pushed around heavy snow, chalky conditions, tight trees (east coast), steep groomers, more mellow trails - fantastic all around ski. Got the 184 (6 ft, 195 lbs). Swingweight seems light and it seems precise and slightly more floaty than the M5 in powder and a touch more forgiving and softer in the tips. No twichiness on run-outs, wasn’t hooky at all, could do pretty much anything and everything very well.
I also have the M102 in 177. It’s a total beast. I’ve been on about 15 different skis so far this year and the M102 and M6 are my two favorite (Bonafide 97 in 183 is pretty close too). I think the 102 is a better pure carver than the M5 and might hold an edge a bit better, but I’ve only spent one day on the M6. I’m also comparing the 102 in 177 to the M6 in 184.
Best part is that the fresh snow covered up the tips so i didn’t have to look at the black carbon in-lays all day!
The big take away from the Dalbello Catalog for the industry is the Lupo MX 120. The Pantera has needed tech inserts for a while now. about damn time.
NEXT: Atomic make the fucking Bentchetler 110 already. Abosulty zero folks outside of the two dozen muppets on epic/pugski/skitalk give a fuck about the Maven/Maveric/Vantage 4.million evolution of uninspired all mountain skis. Your Brand in NA is the Bentchetler. The 120 is literally the only ski over 115 that sells worth a damn at the retail level. Morons spend over retail for greatful dead graphic versions like it's a steel fucking rolex daytona. Make the width everyone wants to buy.
Maven— as in “Bluehouse?”
Am I reading this wrong? Why is anyone talking about a Bluehouse Maven?
Refers to a new Atomic Maven
Yeah that's weird but maybe the AX is softer if they gave it a softer tongue? Or it's a typo.
Also the MX120 looks like a 200g heavier air130 (toungeless tourer) but with a 102 last. Clog is most defently off the Lupo mold not Panterra bases off pictures.
Interesting line up changes for sure.
Alright folks, we have our 2022 ski gear preview live now.
We got as many brands in as we could, more to come as we chase down the details and photos.
https://www.evo.com/discover/ski/gear-preview
Snowboard gear preview will be online soon, too.
Blackops Whizbanger? Wtf...
Lol, did the Biden team name that?
Thanks!
Question 1; LibTechs - is it their rep who doesn't provide you with info on the 2022 products or do you just rate them so poorly that you can't be arsed to write anything about them? I ask as the same thing happened last year - picture with zero info, something that struck me as extremely odd. I just don't get how they are included, yet not included if you get what I mean.
Question 2: M-Frees - what lenghts are the 99s, 108s and 118s offered in for the 2022 season?
Thanks again!
XT3 Tour Pro looks great 1300g, 55 degree ROM 130 flex. Sign me up. Anyone seen them or skied them?
If the XT3 Tour Pro fits like an XT3 LV I'd gladly ditch my Hawx and buy both those Langes for a 2 boot quiver
How is the Lupo Mx 120 anything to be stoked over- just don’t get it? A tongue less bucket boot?
Learned from someone who demoed the MFree 99 that it will come in 171cm, 179cm and 185cm. Dimensions are 128/99/120.
Would love to know radius(guessing 20ish m) and weight(guessing 2050 grams?) in the 185cm.
Another who would love a 186/188cm MFree 108!!
https://youtu.be/VX0TNcHSKPo
Freeskier’s post on IG has them at 1520G, 54 degrees (with buckles open), seems like a crowded segment.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Sorry if already asked but does the new lease xt3 have replaceable soles? Looks iffy from pics
From the Freeskier article: "Out here in the West, most people are not touring on an 80-millimeter-waist, ultralight ski like they do in Europe and in other places,”
With those buckles, looks like they assume bc skiers in NA don't hike through scree fields, either.
That’s the opposite problem with the 108 with nothing between 182cm and 192cm but I might just go a bit forward on the 192cm being 175lbs and liking moguls.
Curious the weight on the MFree 99 if you still have the shorter 179cm one around. Can just deduct binding weight if they are mounted. Probably 19m on the 185cm I bet then.
Know this probably should go in the Dynastar thread but will there still be the 192 LP 105 model (insert new name here)
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
For me it's about replacing the soles due to them getting destroyed by the sled. They only last a season typically.
Well, technically that sole is still replaceable. It's just not screwed on nor swappable with other norms.
Not liking this whole lack of DIN soles thing. It's like they took a page from the mountain bike industry.
"Oh, you have skis and bindings that are more than 2 years old? Get fucked."