Check Out Our Shop
Page 42 of 49 FirstFirst ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ... LastLast
Results 1,026 to 1,050 of 1201

Thread: 80 series land cruiser futures

  1. #1026
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    11,005
    And Toyota hybrids are cabbie go-tos.
    Last edited by Mazderati; 08-03-2023 at 10:19 PM.

  2. #1027
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    And Toyota hybrids are cabbie go-tos.
    Seriously, Toyota is the bar setter when it comes to hybrids and very few come close, let alone match, their hybrid power trains.
    Live Free or Die

  3. #1028
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Yeah, they got serious about them a long time ago, and when one cab driver put more miles than anyone on a first gen Prius, Toyota actually bought it back from him to study it. https://driving.ca/vehicle-types/ele...blazing-cabbie

  4. #1029
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,391
    Does any (likely non-US folks) have a sense about the durability differences between Land Cruisers and Land Cruiser Prados in markets where both are sold? I've seen a lot of the Prados in India, but I think because of my own preconceptiosn about Indian market vehicles, imagined that they were built to much lower tolerances than their bigger siblings. I've never been in either, but I think my bias is based on being unimpressed with the Fortuner vis the Forerunner.

  5. #1030
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusBrody View Post
    Does any (likely non-US folks) have a sense about the durability differences between Land Cruisers and Land Cruiser Prados in markets where both are sold? I've seen a lot of the Prados in India, but I think because of my own preconceptiosn about Indian market vehicles, imagined that they were built to much lower tolerances than their bigger siblings. I've never been in either, but I think my bias is based on being unimpressed with the Fortuner vis the Forerunner.
    I think the Prado has every bit the reputation of the full sized LC.

    My perception is that the Fortuner and 4Runner are a step down from either the Prado or the 200 series and that the Fortuner is a further step down.

    I say this as a happy 4Runner owner.

  6. #1031
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    7,432
    4Runners & Land Cruisers are made in Japan at the some of the most meticulous factories in the world.

  7. #1032
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    4Runners & Land Cruisers are made in Japan at the some of the most meticulous factories in the world.
    My understanding is that 4Runner, GX and Prado are made in the same factory in Tahara.

    Someone once told me or maybe I read that the LC/ Prado is engineered for a longer service life and more time spent off-road, but I'm not sure if that is true and I can't readily find anything saying so.

  8. #1033
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusBrody View Post
    Does any (likely non-US folks) have a sense about the durability differences between Land Cruisers and Land Cruiser Prados in markets where both are sold? I've seen a lot of the Prados in India, but I think because of my own preconceptiosn about Indian market vehicles, imagined that they were built to much lower tolerances than their bigger siblings. I've never been in either, but I think my bias is based on being unimpressed with the Fortuner vis the Forerunner.
    US person, but off road enthusiast. Seen a lot of reports of 8.0” and even 8.2” diffs or axles blown up in Prado/GX/4Runner platforms. Lots of slipped alignment tabs, blown up CV’s, and more. Haven’t seen many of those issues in LC’s outside of early 100 series 2 pinion front diffs. The 80’s, 100's, and 200’s all have 9.5” ring gears in the rear and (if I remember correctly) 9” ring gears in the front. Pretty beefy.

  9. #1034
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    Where is the new US 250 manufactured? Still in Tahara?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #1035
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    Where is the new US 250 manufactured? Still in Tahara?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #1036
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    6,409
    Press release says Tahara.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  12. #1037
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    That’s a relief, honestly, still don’t quite know what to make of it. It seems like an FJ cruiser more than a LC. But maybe that’s in ill informed opinion. Idk, just curious who their target buyer is? What will the typical 4R buyer do? Buy a J250? Or buy the new angry mouth, evil eyed 4R…

    🤷♂️

    As a J200 owner, I am more likely to buy an LX600 as I like the space, V6, non-hybrid.

    Also.. lame we lose our tailgate on the LC, LX.

    Just glad I don’t have to make a decision for another 10 years!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #1038
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    That’s a relief, honestly, still don’t quite know what to make of it. It seems like an FJ cruiser more than a LC. But maybe that’s in ill informed opinion. Idk, just curious who their target buyer is? What will the typical 4R buyer do? Buy a J250? Or buy the new angry mouth, evil eyed 4R…

    🤷♂️

    As a J200 owner, I am more likely to buy an LX600 as I like the space, V6, non-hybrid.

    Also.. lame we lose our tailgate on the LC, LX.

    Just glad I don’t have to make a decision for another 10 years!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Well I'm very curious about them as I want a largish, space efficient vehicle that will lug a lot of outdoor gear reasonably efficiently across washboard desert roads. When we road trip and car camp, we pack everything in big, square gasket boxes, so I love boxy cargo areas.

    I would consider the 4Runner and lots of other alternatives. I do like what I see from the new model though so far.

  14. #1039
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusBrody View Post
    Well I'm very curious about them as I want a largish, space efficient vehicle that will lug a lot of outdoor gear reasonably efficiently across washboard desert roads. When we road trip and car camp, we pack everything in big, square gasket boxes, so I love boxy cargo areas.

    I would consider the 4Runner and lots of other alternatives. I do like what I see from the new model though so far.
    Good perspective; speaking of cargo space, losing some for the battery is lamooooo.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  15. #1040
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    Good perspective; speaking of cargo space, losing some for the battery is lamooooo.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Yep, i will be very interested to see how they package it. I'm liking the square rear design trend though.

  16. #1041
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,724
    Curious about range. I read the claim that the hybrid tundra will have a range over 700 miles (assume that’s highway).

  17. #1042
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,158
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    That’s a relief, honestly, still don’t quite know what to make of it. It seems like an FJ cruiser more than a LC. But maybe that’s in ill informed opinion. Idk, just curious who their target buyer is? What will the typical 4R buyer do? Buy a J250? Or buy the new angry mouth, evil eyed 4R…

    🤷♂️

    As a J200 owner, I am more likely to buy an LX600 as I like the space, V6, non-hybrid.

    Also.. lame we lose our tailgate on the LC, LX.

    Just glad I don’t have to make a decision for another 10 years!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Well the FJ was rock solid reliable and, to this day, has spectacular resale value. Is it really a bad thing? The FJ also sold leaps and bounds more units than the Land Cruiser, even at the end of its life cycle, so it had something going for it.
    Live Free or Die

  18. #1043
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,610
    Just bought a "Poor Man's Land Cruiser" AKA Sequoia. Pretty amazing though. It is a 1st gen, 2001, Limited with, get this, 55k on the odometer. Timing belt was done at 39k, ten years ago. It was a car that was only driven on vacation and otherwise sat at a mansion in Vail in the garage. It is like a time capsule. Going to upgrade the stereo, and throw a lift and tires on it and call it good.

  19. #1044
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    Sweet pick up. I always liked the body style of the gen one Seqs. Much better than the bloated marshmallow vibe.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #1045
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by AdironRider View Post
    Well the FJ was rock solid reliable and, to this day, has spectacular resale value. Is it really a bad thing? The FJ also sold leaps and bounds more units than the Land Cruiser, even at the end of its life cycle, so it had something going for it.
    I went out to get gas and saw 2 FJs on my 12 block round trip. I always liked them save for the visibility. I'm perfectly happy with less luxury, but I do tend to keep vehicles a long time so the cruiser's reputation in that area is a draw.

  21. #1046
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,610
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    Sweet pick up. I always liked the body style of the gen one Seqs. Much better than the bloated marshmallow vibe
    Yeah, I have a 2009 Tundra and the 1st gen Sequoia feels much smaller in the cab, in a good way. I bet it is about the same size as a newer forerunner. Remove the third row and fold the fronts forward and it makes a nice sleeping area for car camping.

  22. #1047
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    SF & the Ho
    Posts
    10,993
    Quote Originally Posted by Name Redacted View Post
    Just bought a "Poor Man's Land Cruiser" AKA Sequoia. Pretty amazing though. It is a 1st gen, 2001, Limited with, get this, 55k on the odometer. Timing belt was done at 39k, ten years ago. It was a car that was only driven on vacation and otherwise sat at a mansion in Vail in the garage. It is like a time capsule. Going to upgrade the stereo, and throw a lift and tires on it and call it good.
    That sounds like a sweet deal. Maybe mansion finds are better than barn finds?!

  23. #1048
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    7,432
    Remarkable if true: Toyota inadvertently leaked 26MPG combined on their site for the new hybrid Land Cruiser.

  24. #1049
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Watching over the valley
    Posts
    5,353
    Quote Originally Posted by Name Redacted View Post
    Just bought a "Poor Man's Land Cruiser" AKA Sequoia. Pretty amazing though. It is a 1st gen, 2001, Limited with, get this, 55k on the odometer. Timing belt was done at 39k, ten years ago. It was a car that was only driven on vacation and otherwise sat at a mansion in Vail in the garage. It is like a time capsule. Going to upgrade the stereo, and throw a lift and tires on it and call it good.
    You should do that timing belt... it's old, rubber, and critical.
    sigless.

  25. #1050
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    Remarkable if true: Toyota inadvertently leaked 26MPG combined on their site for the new hybrid Land Cruiser.
    I saw it when it was still up, though I thought it was 27 mpg. I think it unlikely, but not out of the realm of possibility. The same powertrain drives the Grand Highlander, which is roughly the same size vehicle (longer and slightly wider, but also slight shorter) and it is officially rated at 27mpg combined. With the Highlander having AWD vs full-time 4WD, I'd expect the Highlander to be more efficient, but we don't know weights yet either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •