Check Out Our Shop
Page 43 of 103 FirstFirst ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,075 of 2569

Thread: Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

  1. #1051
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by plugboots View Post
    Just ordered FR110’s. I’ve read the whole thread and it’s still a little confusing to me, but what would be a ski available right now that I could demo that would be the most similar to an FR 110?
    4frnt Devastator is the only ski that you could call similar, and probably not easy to find a demo.

  2. #1052
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,772
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    4frnt Devastator is the only ski that you could call similar, and probably not easy to find a demo.
    Thanks. Hmmmmmmm…multi-radius camber.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  3. #1053
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Golden B.C.
    Posts
    651
    Moment meridian too


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #1054
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by skisurfmirth View Post
    Moment meridian too
    I thought they stopped making them a few years ago? Been trying to find a pair myself...

  5. #1055
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,483

    Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

    BeHuWe has a pair up for sale right now
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  6. #1056
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,945
    The closest I'm aware of shape-wise is the Folsom Primary 110 Shallow RC option. I know Folsom does a lot of demos, but I'm not sure they have the flat camber version in a demo these days.

  7. #1057
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Golden B.C.
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    I thought they stopped making them a few years ago? Been trying to find a pair myself...
    It’s on their website for this season. But sold out.

  8. #1058
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    10,542
    Plugboots I'm on older devs, ordered fr110. I'm in Taos now, then SLC 3/10, then points north to MT end of season.

    Pretty much was a legend pro/1st cham107 guy before going reverse.

    Like WRG said to me, it's like a cheat code. My devs w blast through chop rail groom etc. But when in Billy goat tight shit, can noodle around slide etc. Not hard to adapt to at all.

    You'll be stoked on the fr110. It'll do a lot really really well.

  9. #1059
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,772
    ^^^ Cool, thanks. This is what I’m expecting.
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  10. #1060
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by byates1 View Post
    Plugboots I'm on older devs, ordered fr110. I'm in Taos now, then SLC 3/10, then points north to MT end of season.

    Pretty much was a legend pro/1st cham107 guy before going reverse.

    Like WRG said to me, it's like a cheat code. My devs w blast through chop rail groom etc. But when in Billy goat tight shit, can noodle around slide etc. Not hard to adapt to at all.

    You'll be stoked on the fr110. It'll do a lot really really well.
    How does the shape and ride compare to the v werks katana.

  11. #1061
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    137
    Quote Originally Posted by arild View Post
    I don't think you need to know exactly which one ski a HL ski is based on to buy one, as it's pretty simple. None of the skis are based on just one shape, they're all built on meeting certain conditions and perform very well there.

    FL113 - Pow, chop, speed, pivot, slarve. Straight shape, long low rockers. -11.5 mount.

    FL105 - Speed, chop, crud, smash through stuff. More sidecut, camber and shorter rockers. -12 mount.

    FR110 - full reverse, bi directional camber, wideish all terrain ski, for float, fun and smashing through stuff at a larger variety of speeds. Designed to be able to ski switch to the road. -6 mount.

    support the raddest project going: http://heritagelabskis.com
    Okay that’s just the FL/FR skis and you ignored the RaceRoom question. What is the difference between RR and FL?

  12. #1062
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,752
    Yes, the raceroom skis have a traditional flex pattern (softer tip and stiffer tail), much less rockered/progressive shapes, and metal laminate. They are also offered in AM (about 7.5 of 10 stiffness) and Comp (about 9 of 10). So they will be cleaner on edge and a bit more traditional feeling in bumps/trees - where the FL is more surfy and loose.

    the AM is a precision tool and the Comp is for chargers who put a lot of energy into the ski. Both builds are the most directional skis in the range and definitely reward skiers who like to round out their turns.

    In contrast, the FL skis are more progressively shaped (more taper, more rocker, etc) and have a very different flex pattern that is more designed to blow up cut up snow. They are for skiing down the fall line - even on edge and carving. You are carving down the fall line.

    the Freeride skis are for being creative and making all sorts of turns: slashing, drifting, pivoting, carving. Way more modern (centered) mount.

    all the skis in the HL range are designed to be very smooth, confidence inspiring, and encourage you to keep skiing faster and faster. They just go about it in different ways! I am more than happy to talk through the skis you have liked/not in the past, and could compare/contrast as well.

  13. #1063
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,752
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    How does the shape and ride compare to the v werks katana.
    so the rocker profiles are fairly similar, but the mount point is very different. The VWK line is like -14 and most people ski them at like -12. The BC110 line is -6, and I personally plan to ski them at -8. The line on the C113 for reference is -11.5. While it does have a small amount of camber; it’s rocker is very long and low, and skis pretty similarly to the VWK. I ran out of time to type up thoughts on this, so I’ll get to it this weekend!

  14. #1064
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,899

    Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

    Quote Originally Posted by puhisurfer View Post
    Okay that’s just the FL/FR skis and you ignored the RaceRoom question. What is the difference between RR and FL?
    Basically…

    RR and AM are metal laminate with a maple core
    FL are glass and rubber with a poplar/bamboo core

    Of course that doesn’t cover the differences in sidecut, profile, and flex characteristics. It’s all on the site. Go read https://heritagelabskis.com

  15. #1065
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    so the rocker profiles are fairly similar, but the mount point is very different. The VWK line is like -14 and most people ski them at like -12. The BC110 line is -6, and I personally plan to ski them at -8. The line on the C113 for reference is -11.5. While it does have a small amount of camber; it’s rocker is very long and low, and skis pretty similarly to the VWK. I ran out of time to type up thoughts on this, so I’ll get to it this weekend!
    Thanks dude. Sounds like I might like the C113.

  16. #1066
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Quote Originally Posted by PNW Lifer View Post
    If we are able to rustle up enough support to press longer FR110's I would love to swap for the bigger sticks!
    Yes. I’m in

    Can we change the topsheet?

  17. #1067
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    10,542
    Fr227 w bag of dicks top sheet?

  18. #1068
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by PNW Lifer View Post
    If we are able to rustle up enough support to press longer FR110's I would love to swap for the bigger sticks!

    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    Yes. I’m in

    Can we change the topsheet?
    Maybe just buy what the man offers now to fund future line expansion?

    I'd bet two pounds of applewood-smoked bacon that you'd be fine on the 186cm, and might get an ass-kickin by a hypothetical 194 or whatever. These are supposed to be a more playful shape and I think this first offered length is a great place to start.

    Maybe get the 192 105 if you "need" a bigger weapon?

  19. #1069
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,711

    Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

    ^this. Buy the 194 Devastator if that’s what you think you need. I think I sold my pair to a mag in the Midwest for $100 shipped to his door. They’re basically free.

    I’ve skied most of the offerings in this ~110 UF reverse camber category and what Marshal is describing sounds perfect for this ski IMHO.

    ETA sorry the 194 Devs sold for $135 with bindings, shipped. OP:

    Dynastar Protos w/ pivots and 4FRNT Devastators w/ mojos
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...d.php?t=333235
    Last edited by Self Jupiter; 02-18-2023 at 06:13 PM.

  20. #1070
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,483

    Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

    Yup, Norse and Jup are spot on, I am also a big fan of this category and have owned and do still own a couple of these sticks. What Marshall is offering is pretty much exactly how/what I would want this ski built.
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  21. #1071
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    688
    FR110s ordered. Very excited for these!

  22. #1072
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Yeah the BC110 look awesome. Should have my hands on some R87 AM mid week. Will be putting ATK’s on them and using them for after hours resort skin rips.

  23. #1073
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    644
    I'm just now discovering the RC world and definitely curious about the FR110 [emoji102]

  24. #1074
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    43
    Those of you who've had the skis shipped to Canada, did you get hit with any brokerage fees? It looks like UPS has changed their rules:

    https://www.ups.com/us/en/supplychai...al-Rates.page#

  25. #1075
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Quote Originally Posted by puhisurfer View Post
    Okay that’s just the FL/FR skis and you ignored the RaceRoom question. What is the difference between RR and FL?
    Jeez - entitled much?

    I am frankly impressed that Marshal did not call you out on the way you articulate yourself in his reply.

    Quote Originally Posted by jackattack View Post
    Basically…

    RR and AM are metal laminate with a maple core
    FL are glass and rubber with a poplar/bamboo core

    Of course that doesn’t cover the differences in sidecut, profile, and flex characteristics. It’s all on the site. Go read https://heritagelabskis.com
    But that would mean that one would actually have to do the bare minimum of research before asking someone else to provide the answer to you. That takes effort.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •