EHP is flat camber, fwiw.
Sent fra min LYA-L29 via Tapatalk
EHP is flat camber, fwiw.
Sent fra min LYA-L29 via Tapatalk
I think the EHP and the Hoji are pretty different, although I have never skied the Hoji.
EHP, in a 186, has basically flat camber underfoot. It has a bit of rocker in the tip and tail, I put the measurements in a post above.
The EHP is also 116 underfoot. The Hoji and EHP are pretty different skis, from what I remember. I think the Hoji is more of a slimmed down Renegade, although I could be completely wrong. It seemed like a slimmer Renegade, with the reverse camber matching the sidecut or something like that. I'm sure I'm missing some details, hopefully someone can correct me.
But yeah, I don't know that I would call the EHP an earlier iteration of the Hoji. The Hoji represented a substantial change, going from 116 underfoot for the EHP to 112 and changing up the rocker profile. The Hoji was a new beast, not really a slightly modified EHP but a new ski altogether.
I was always curious about the Hoji, given how much I loved the EHP, but it seemed like a significantly different ski. I really wanted something around 185 with around 116 underfoot, the Hoji seemed like a great ski for someone who also had one bigger ski, like maybe a Renegade.
"Have you ever seen a monk get wildly fucked by a bunch of teenage girls?" "No" "Then forget the monastery."
"You ever hear of a little show called branded? Arthur Digby Sellers wrote 156 episodes. Not exactly a lightweight." Walter Sobcheck.
"I didn't have a grandfather on the board of some fancy college. Key word being was. Did he touch the Filipino exchange student? Did he not touch the Filipino exchange student? I don't know Brooke, I wasn't there."
Just curious, anyone have thoughts on a -1cm width FRS for primarily inbounds / sidecountry glades and tight trees? Seems similar to the MVP 108 (which i guess it's based on), but I like that the FRS has higher tips, longer radius, and a bit more rocker. I'm trying to fill the gap between Woodsman 102s and Kusalas...
Thirded
Hot deals at praxisskis.com right now.
Just picked up a pair of FRD's (HH+C and veneer) for $700. Looks like the non-veneer models are available for $595 as well.
Not gonna tell my girlfriend as my Praxis quiver is getting fairly absurd. Now I just need some Jedi's and some Sluggers haha
I am not going to lie - those Jedi Mind Sticks look mighty tempting, as does the FRS. And Protests, must not forget Protests.
I also do not know why Praxis are trying so hard to make the Protest look like a kid's ski the last few years - but I actually liked the graphic this year - kinda funny.
Anyone got any info on the new-for-this-year protest rocker profile?
Might be a mis-print but veneer GPO’s are the same price as nylon at $595
I saw that….
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I rip the groomed on tele gear
Those FRDs are beautiful. Is that new this year? I don’t recall it in their lineup.
Last edited by gaijin; 07-28-2022 at 09:33 PM.
Shredeagle got the Jedi's last year when Keith rolled thru and loves them. I was tempted but my quiver is kinda saturated in that area at the moment. They look like sick skis though
I’m really curious how they’d do in a CCR profile…
Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!
New MVP looks bloody good.
I've got an old pair of 187 MVPs that I'd like to consign to full time touring duty (with ATK 14). The tails suck for skin clips and kick turns, though, so thought about chopping 4cm or so of them and cutting some notches for the clips. Good idea, or have I got rocks in my head?
Why not customize a GPO instead of gambling on a "new" creation (+10 BC). The GPO has been thoroughly fleshed out, and is a mature design.
Of course, this advice comes from someone who specified a +10 GPO, so I'm not one to talk ;-)
I did get Keith's "signoff" that it was the most probable design to suit my goals (Protests don't work for me).
... Thom
Galibier Designcrafting technology in service of music
HaHa! Probably gon get rocks thrown but I had the exact same thoughts ala Quixote! I do like the BC shape and like the idea of a +1 but I do think the Q fits the bill better. Really dig the GPO’s but “variable charger > pow shape” says Q to me…
Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!
No, I sure like them for what they are! I had these built a bit to replicate the BC Sevun II but with a more releasable tail, and for that they fit the bill precisely. They are no auto slashers per design and they require some input in technical stuff, so a bit more traditional directional skis compared to other contemporary wide ski designs. No pow skis per se, but skis pow just fine. in some cut up slushy conditions I found that they crossed the fall line a tad to easily, so I decided to move boot center back a bit. have not been on them since so can't fill in details on what the change led to. When I posted about them when I got them I also got the question "why not the GPO", but as earlier mentioned, I had come to like the +1 BC's Sevun resemblance in regards to dimensions, sidecut placement, almost straight taper sections, tip design, and with the added tail rocker instead of Sevuns short duck tail upturn. These carve great, even on really hard surfaces. I like present and active tails. Plus, I'm not into tail sinkers when it comes to 3D snow. I don't have to see my tips way above the snow surface to trust I get flotation, so anything resembling pin tails turns me off. So there's that!
Are we not going to talk about those crazy veneer protests that are on sale on the website for $595?
I can't be the only one who's seen that? https://www.praxisskis.com/skis/protest-veneer-top/
192 Walnut had me drooling.
Those things are sooo cool looking.
Bookmarks