Check Out Our Shop
Page 12 of 37 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 910

Thread: 21/22 Gear Rumors

  1. #276
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by burrito View Post
    Blank comes in a 194... interesting

  2. #277
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewy30 View Post
    Blank comes in a 194... interesting
    Seems like some conflicting info out there right now, 194 or 192. Be nice if it ends up 194, but I'm not holding my breath

  3. #278
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    447

  4. #279
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,974
    Quote Originally Posted by travel_to_ski View Post
    I guess we have the answer. At 194, I wish the next step down was 188 vs 186.

  5. #280
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by travel_to_ski View Post
    Well, that's conclusive. Cool. Wonder what it weighs.

  6. #281
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,274
    It says 2200g at 186. I'll be buying it, looks just about perfect for a PNW DD and it comes in a mid 180 size unlike the Rustler 11. I also like the simple topsheet design.

  7. #282
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,757
    Blister just released a review of the Blank 186

  8. #283
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,020
    Unless you get a solly pro deal I can’t for the life of me figure out why someone would buy the blank over something like the woodsman 108


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #284
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillsburrito
    Posts
    2,747
    Quote Originally Posted by 123ski View Post
    Unless you get a solly pro deal I can’t for the life of me figure out why someone would buy the blank over something like the woodsman 108


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Because it comes in a length (that's not the actual length) for people that still think they need that length (but really don't). Then they wish the next length down came in a different length, even though they are opining for the longest length. Typical TGR Retarfuckery.
    Training for Alpental

  10. #285
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by Sessiøn View Post
    Because it comes in a length (that's not the actual length) for people that still think they need that length (but really don't). Then they wish the next length down came in a different length, even though they are opining for the longest length. Typical TGR Retarfuckery.
    Lolz I think you nailed it


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #286
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by 123ski View Post
    Unless you get a solly pro deal I can’t for the life of me figure out why someone would buy the blank over something like the woodsman 108


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    For the same reason that I would get a lot of skis over the woodsman, more playful, larger sweet spot, but gives up less than you think stability wise. Kudos if the woodsman is the ski for you, but it’s not for everyone and more companies are creating good playful skis with a backbone. I’m no Salomon fan boy, just that about 110mm underfoot mix of stable and playful is my favorite category of ski so it’s nice to see another option.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  12. #287
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by Sessiøn View Post
    Because it comes in a length (that's not the actual length) for people that still think they need that length (but really don't). Then they wish the next length down came in a different length, even though they are opining for the longest length. Typical TGR Retarfuckery.
    Love the honest commentary...pegs the entertainment meter. [emoji6]
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  13. #288
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367

    21/22 Gear Rumors

    ...
    Last edited by Bandit Man; 01-28-2021 at 05:31 PM.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  14. #289
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Golden
    Posts
    1,202
    Apparently there is no Dalbello Lupo 130 c next tear and they are just doing the 130HD. Can anyone confirm that?

    Also, all kryptons have tech inserts

  15. #290
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenBC View Post
    Apparently there is no Dalbello Lupo 130 c next tear and they are just doing the 130HD. Can anyone confirm that?

    Also, all kryptons have tech inserts
    Interesting. I would be curious if the Lupo Pro HD and the new Krypton have the exact same lower clog, and the only difference is the cuff. Would make iriponsnow's Kryptolupo hack even more legit.

  16. #291
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    186 QST Blank vs 187 ON3P Woodsman 108

    “It wouldn’t be a huge stretch to think of the Woodsman 108 as a more consistently stiff, longer-radius QST Blank. The heavier 19/20 Woodsman 108 we tested offered similar suspension to the QST Blank, but the Woodsman 108’s longer sidecut radius and stiffer shovels make it a bit more stable in chop and crud. In terms of maneuverability, we’d say the QST Blank is easier to slash around in soft snow, but the Woodsman is a bit easier in tighter, firmer moguls. Both tread the line between freestyle and directional skis, and we’d say they’re similarly playful overall. Both float really well in deep snow and we’re not sure there’s a clear winner there, though the Blank does feel more maneuverable in deep conditions. We’d give the nod to the QST Blank when it comes to carving turns on piste, particularly on more moderate-angle slopes. We’re very curious to see how the updated, slightly lighter Woodsman 108 compares, but we think it could be a good alternative to the QST Blank if you want something a bit narrower and stable when making bigger, faster turns.”


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    So woodsman is just as playful, but more stable and skis faster longer turns. Sounds like the QST blank is a pussified version - and I hope when someone buys it they can remember that every time they ski it


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  17. #292
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by 123ski View Post
    Unless you get a solly pro deal I can’t for the life of me figure out why someone would buy the blank over something like the woodsman 108


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I just don't understand the 17m radius. It's a great width and weight for a fat do-it-all/all mountain ski, a bit of metal is nice, the lengths are there, and I'm sure it can be had a lot cheaper than a woodsman via Amersports proform, but the radius seems weird for their fattest ski (also their fattest ski is 112 now?). Its like a Salomon Wailer 112. I feel like Salomon hasn't had a decent lineup since they had the rocker2, q115 and qlab series. I thought that lineup at least made sense even if I wasn't a fan of all the skis.

  18. #293
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    At the North end of the Parkway
    Posts
    1,835
    The Q115 was a 21m in the 188. It's pretty close. I still ski the 115 and find that it can make many different turn shapes with out problems. They are a fun everything ski that rips on soft groomers too. It does sound like it's not the ski for you but that doesn't mean it's a bad ski. It seems there are some skiers that like thw shape and design.

  19. #294
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    409
    Seems like an easy enough thing for Dalbello to drop the Lupo Air off that mold and beef up the plastic and hardware on the Quantum mold if it's got a (way) better ROM and will perform well enough to tourers' tastes that want a 1300g boot. Seems like a good competitor to the LS Skorpius. Post a thread when you're able to get them on snow!

  20. #295
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    3,382
    Quote Originally Posted by 123ski View Post
    Unless you get a solly pro deal I can’t for the life of me figure out why someone would buy the blank over something like the woodsman 108


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I read the whole Blister review and with Jonathon and Luke rehashing every aspect of the ski with very bland, average takes, they could’ve edited the whole thing down to “Solly releases the Toyota Camry of 110+ skis.”


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #296
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by alpinevibes View Post
    I read the whole Blister review and with Jonathon and Luke rehashing every aspect of the ski with very bland, average takes, they could’ve edited the whole thing down to “Solly releases the Toyota Camry of 110+ skis.”
    You know how many Camrys they sell a year? (actually the Blank skis better than the Camry drives)

  22. #297
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    You know how many Camrys they sell a year?
    Nobody wants a Camry.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  23. #298
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,961
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleBeaver View Post
    I just don't understand the 17m radius. It's a great width and weight for a fat do-it-all/all mountain ski, a bit of metal is nice, the lengths are there, and I'm sure it can be had a lot cheaper than a woodsman via Amersports proform, but the radius seems weird for their fattest ski (also their fattest ski is 112 now?). Its like a Salomon Wailer 112. I feel like Salomon hasn't had a decent lineup since they had the rocker2, q115 and qlab series. I thought that lineup at least made sense even if I wasn't a fan of all the skis.
    They’re producing a versatile soft snow ski, that they can manufacture in large numbers at a low price, that lots of skiers are going to buy and love, while leaving the specialty niches (chargers, super deep, tricksters, shit snow) for the smaller companies. Seems like a great strategy for making huge corporate profits. They’ll sell 10 times as many of these as they did QST118s (which I thought were a mediocre ski). The Blank could be a daily driver for 50% of the skiers at my local, while only a few obsessives (like myself) will justify a quiver of wider skis.

  24. #299
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by kootenayskier View Post
    They’re producing a versatile soft snow ski, that they can manufacture in large numbers at a low price, that lots of skiers are going to buy and love, while leaving the specialty niches (chargers, super deep, tricksters, shit snow) for the smaller companies. Seems like a great strategy for making huge corporate profits. They’ll sell 10 times as many of these as they did QST118s (which I thought were a mediocre ski). The Blank could be a daily driver for 50% of the skiers at my local, while only a few obsessives (like myself) will justify a quiver of wider skis.
    I’d hate to be a solly athlete right now. Not a single good ski in the lineup. How can any of them ski a legit AK line with their widest option at 112 and a turn radius that tight?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  25. #300
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by 123ski View Post
    Nobody wants a Camry.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    LIke nobody wanted the Soul 7 . . .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •