I know what you're getting at, but I'd say there actually are plenty of things that cannot be broken, for example one-way cryptographic hashing using certain (open source) algorithms. It is possible to design systems that are safe in this sense; storing a bunch of GPS data in S3 is not that type of thing though, which I think you're getting at, and on which we are entirely agreed.
eta: and whatever the folks rushing to market to sell this "contact tracing" thing to the stupidest state that would listen (Utah) did, it's almost certainly "store a bunch of GPS data in S3" or some analogous thing
to make an extremely non-technical analogy on a technical subject, the Utah contact tracing app is the "inject yourself with lysol" of contact tracing. it won't work and it has lots of downsides.
Is everyone still holding to the "no way it was in the US in early January" belief?
Whatever fucked me up for 3 weeks in Jan has caused lung pain and dry cough ever SINCE. It's May. WTF? I am seeing slow slow improvement with bike riding, etc. Just crazy. Nothing in my life ever caused this kind of prolonged lung issues. I doubt my "really bad cold" from over the winter caused this. Call me crazy I guess.
I admit I'm not at all familiar with the UT app so let me ask - is the intent to locate within 6 feet specifically, which I agree isn't going to happen, or is it to notify that someone had tested positive in a general location? The latter would see to just feed on people's fear without providing any meaningful data, no?
“When you see something that is not right, not just, not fair, you have a moral obligation to say something. To do something." Rep. John Lewis
Kindness is a bridge between all people
Dunkin’ Donuts Worker Dances With Customer Who Has Autism
They're definitely claiming that, if you find out you're infected, contact tracers can go and notify everyone who was "exposed" to you that they were exposed. The CDC et all are saying that's being within 6' for some time period iirc. They also claim the app will identify "hot spots" and it has some other features. I don't think the UT govt's intention was nefarious*, I think they're just not very sharp technologically, but it's still going to both not work and be a big privacy risk, imo.
* I certainly do think that if legalized mass GPS collection of individually identifiable citizens by the government becomes routine in the US it will be used nefariously
You know, I'm usually fairly healthy and don't get sick much at all, but since this past fall I had both friggin strains of the flu (I travel a lot for work), and then got a 3rd "upper respiratory thing" in January that tested negative for influenza, but it sucked so bad it made me wish I had the flu again. Luckily no lingering effects though.
At the time I went into the Doctor (mild fever, bad very dry chest cough, NO sinus anything, very sore throat, terrible body aches). She gave me a strep test (negative) and didn't see any reason to do a flu test for some reason.
Whatever it was it sucked, but I worked through it and never took a sick day......it was hell. I would have taken a sick day or 10, but the only other employee at the company was so sick that he ended up in the hospital twice. Somebody had to work.
Who the fuck knows.
And again the US shows the world why we're Number 1....fuuuuuuuuck.
![]()
we are dumb and bad of course, but that is still a weird choice of countries for comparison. faeroe islands? estonia?
Agree, but this is the same with every other disease, like flu. People that have a mild case do not go to the doctor.
So we really don't know how many have the flu, we just know how many had bad enough symptoms to go to a doctor.
Sent from my Redmi Note 8 Pro using Tapatalk
I'm pretty confident that the epidemiology of the flu has been studied extensively enough that they aren't simply considering those who went to the doctor when they calculate mortality rates.
This is false. Only a couple of limited studies, some with unreliable data, show more than 25-50% are coming up asymptomatic across multiple studies. Many of the asymptomatic studies thus far are not differentiating PRE-symptomatic from true asymptomatic, in the context of mild disease, and a known time to symptoms that ranges from 5-14+ days.
For instance: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-pers...ses-undetected
Now, on the surface, this headline would be 56% asymptomatic, 27 out of 48 positive with no overt symptoms. But then it states 24 of the 27 went on to develop symptoms with the next 4 days.
Fifty-seven (64%) of 89 residents in this second nursing home tested positive for COVID-19. Of the 76 residents who participated in the surveys, 48 (63%) tested positive. Twenty-seven (56%) of the 48 had no symptoms when tested, and 24 of them later had symptoms within a median of 4 days.
Here is a summary of various studies, most claiming less than 25%.
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-...-asymptomatic/
What is widely held is that the confrimed rtPCR positives likely represent only 10% of the overall infections, and that 90% of true cases are not being documented. This is NOT to say those 90% of those infected are asymptomatic and don't have any clinical symptoms.
Move upside and let the man go through...
Bookmarks