And go infect someone else. I assume these are the same people that cut off 4 lanes of highway traffic because they weren’t paying attention until that was the only option to make their exit.
I don’t agree with the instruction either. But if you do not care for the welfare of others you do not deserve the privilege to exist in polite society.
![]()
Last edited by Self Jupiter; 04-28-2020 at 08:47 AM.
You just seem to be way ahead of the curve. The rest of us have to come to this state sooner or later if we have to. That is, to survive, not go back to "normal" life of the past. For the people who can easily avoid work and crowd interaction, it may just be lonely, while those that have no real choice will have to deal, one way or another. This is why this phrase "we are all in this together" is such bullshit. No we're not. Some of us are just fine, all we have to whine about is no skiing and bars and sports, while many others are forced to choose between health and starvation. Furgetabout the really rich and their second home fortresses with fast internet connections and delivery services.
Good luck.
Sorry, I’m old school.
I love disabled people, but want to have my cake and eat it too by throwing the r-word around in non-serious contexts because I still think it’s inherently funny.
I dunno, I guess I’m turning into one of those old people who doesn’t phase language out with the changing culture. My bad.
Or how kids does in factories.
Why do we even have labor laws? They just slow down the growth of wealth. Workers should do what ever they are told, stfu and no worry so much about their health and well being. Owners worry about that stuff plenty. Truth is, only a few will die. There will always be enough workers who want to work.
No one needs some critical thinker slowing the cogs of wealth development.
Remember when the Patriot Act got passed in the aftermath of 9/11 without most of the senate even having read the bill, because of the panicked political environment and the pervasive national sentiment of "everyone must do everything they can to address this emergency"? It's still law, and we're still pointedly targeting muslim people (or people who we confuse for being muslim) under its auspices. Giving the government (the police) the ability to use data from your phone to decide how to restrict your physical movements is an absolutely horrifying prospect. Look at the voter disenfranchisement operations that happen in red states already. Now imagine you show up to vote, but your phone's GPS history shows you likely live in a predominantly poor democratic part of your district... would anyone be surprised if these folks were more likely to be barred from entry due to "risk of infection"? "Ah sorry, nothing I can do, but the computer here says we can't let you in. Yeah seems like it determined you were in contact with a sick person. You should have received a ballot in the mail though, have a nice day!" And this is without even considering political protest/demonstration or anything like that.
That said: the Google/Apple proposed protocol was about as un-Orwellian as it could be, pretty much. Hopefully that's the model that gets used; anything GPS-based ought to be an absolute non-starter. Every person with a smartphone ought to be terrified at this notion and extremely critical of any proposals, heeding experts in software/technology/privacy much in the same way that we are heeding experts on infectious disease with respect to social distancing protocols.
I came across a research article (about ten years old) reporting that infection from the common cold-causing form of Corona Virus rapidly lead to death of dendritic cells in the upper respiratory track. This rapid death meant that the antigen-presenting functions provided by the dendritic cells is lost and there is then no way to mount an appropriate immune response and that this somehow impedes the development of long-term immune memory to that virus, which might explain why affected patients can be re-infected by that virus. Of course if all this is indeed the case, it doesn't mean that there isn't some sort of long-term immune effect capable of being activated bu SARS-CoV-19. I was going to look up more related papers, but was too busy searching for porn for the NSFW thread.
Your dog just ate an avocado!
Not to mention there's a world of difference between updating priors as new information becomes available versus willfully promoting misinformation.
This must be the Fox pre defense for the upcoming lawsuits.
Insane Clown Posse a model for pandemic leadership.
https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/...ership/610651/
If your escalation bears no fruit there is always HR (eeek!) or maybe your company has a ethics hotline or ombudsman.
Thats if those are even an option in your situation. If you are in a small biz those could all be rolled up into your boss.
I have been in your position where management has failed on a legitimate safety concern and you have to escalate and put a spotlight on yourself to get it handled.
But someone has to do it!
I couldn't deal with the worst case scenarios knowing I should have done something about it.
And doing something rarely comes with kudos.
Except from me.... fight the good fight good luck RocknB!!!!
Bunny Don't Surf
Have you seen a one armed man around here?
OG. Not a virologist of course but there's an Economist article citing a Univ of Montreal study discussing your theory as a line of enquiry
The Economist | A lesson from history https://www.economist.com/node/21784510?frsc=dg%7Ce
Bookmarks