Check Out Our Shop
Page 14 of 53 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... LastLast
Results 326 to 350 of 1320

Thread: Fritschi Tecton

  1. #326
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    In a forward fall when the toe lever is locked out and the user falls straight ahead the boot will not release and the contact bump point will dent the boot.

    This test was conducted by coasting downhill with heel free and toe lever locked out then ramming ski tip into sastrugi. The toe did NOT release.
    How many of you actually fall forward like this when you're skinning? Show of hands.

    Seems like people are searching for a problem, and this is one that won't ever (or hardly ever) occur in real-life conditions. Unless you're really fucking clumsy.

    ETA: I'd be happy to take someone's catastrophically designed Tectons off their hands for the low, boot-saving price of $100. SAVE YER BOOTS PEOPLE. (and sell me your Tectons)

  2. #327
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,975
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post
    How many of you actually fall forward like this when you're skinning? Show of hands.

    Seems like people are searching for a problem, and this is one that won't ever (or hardly ever) occur in real-life conditions. Unless you're really fucking clumsy.

    ETA: I'd be happy to take someone's catastrophically designed Tectons off their hands for the low, boot-saving price of $100. SAVE YER BOOTS PEOPLE. (and sell me your Tectons)
    I have a few times, while doing a kick turn on an icy skin track.

    Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using TGR Forums mobile app

  3. #328
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post
    How many of you actually fall forward like this when you're skinning? Show of hands.

    Seems like people are searching for a problem, and this is one that won't ever (or hardly ever) occur in real-life conditions. Unless you're really fucking clumsy.

    ETA: I'd be happy to take someone's catastrophically designed Tectons off their hands for the low, boot-saving price of $100. SAVE YER BOOTS PEOPLE. (and sell me your Tectons)
    Ever since the confirmation of how this boot-accident became clear, I feel pretty much the same way. Don't fall directly and forcefully forward with your heel free and your toe locked. Seems easy enough. Don't lock the toe while skiing and then crash into something head-on, and try to avoid a total faceplant while skinning. Can't recall ever doing one of those.

  4. #329
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vacationland
    Posts
    6,326
    Quote Originally Posted by meter-man View Post
    How many of you actually fall forward like this when you're skinning? Show of hands.
    I have while bushwhacking through some scrubby shit looking for the best way around an obstacle, shit happens

  5. #330
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    people do fall like that, I remember the early F10's were cracking the toe pivot from forward falls while skinning

    you would think they tested for that but no matter what they test for something always gets missed
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  6. #331
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,495
    Quote Originally Posted by ticketchecker View Post
    I have while bushwhacking through some scrubby shit looking for the best way around an obstacle, shit happens
    Yup.

  7. #332
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    115
    Exactly! Shit happens. I've seen plenty of falls that way.

    Why look at the shift binding now when it releases a year from now?

  8. #333
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by ticketchecker View Post
    I have while bushwhacking through some scrubby shit looking for the best way around an obstacle, shit happens
    Fair enough. I'll check my boots this evening and see if the toe box is high enough for this to be an issue on mine or not. Could be boot-specific, which might help explain how they missed it.

    I'd also be interested in hearing what DINs people are using. I know that the incidents all involve the lockout-mode, but the shop guys told me that on the Tecton, it isn't really a lockout. It just increases the force required to release on your DIN setting by about 50%. So if you have it maxed out, it might behave differently than if you have it set more modestly. I don't have a spare pair of boots to experiment with, but I'd be curious if it has any real effect.

  9. #334
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Westside of the River
    Posts
    395
    Mounted mine last night, and compared them to Dyanfits Rad 2.0s. In terms of toe denting.... on the Dynafits, boot toe (both MTN and Vulcan) will hit the front of the binding as well, but at an angle where your knee would already be on the ground. So no real impact. But on the Tecton, the impact occurs at an angle where your knee will still be in the air above the ski. So I can see how this could/would happen. Can the plastic bumper thingy that is causing the indents just be ground down with a Dremel? What purpose does it even serve?

  10. #335
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    VT
    Posts
    273
    I believe the bumper is designed to release the toe in a forward fall when in ski mode, but it appears that in walk mode the release value is too great to release.

  11. #336
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,038
    ^^^^same Q as Reemer - what purpose does that thing serve.

    I've probably fallen that way too (cuz I'm fucking clumsy), so, seriously guys, don't chance it with yer boots! Not worth it.

    I'll give you the satisfaction of protecting your boots, and will take these bindings off your hands for $75. I'll even trade you an old pair of Plums if you prefer.

  12. #337
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,770
    Quote Originally Posted by telemon10 View Post
    I believe the bumper is designed to release the toe in a forward fall when in ski mode.
    This.

  13. #338
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    2,097
    Phooey. I was pondering these, but I take occasional knee falls. WA touring isn’t always pretty. It’s also hard to pay for brand new binders and start by grinding off material. Looks like I’ll stick to kingpins for now.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  14. #339
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    New data - you can thank me for testing and I'll follow up with Fritschi for the review.

    Design issue as the contact point on the Tecton toe lever is too high for some boot configs. In a forward fall when the toe lever is locked out and the user falls straight ahead the boot will not release and the contact bump point will dent the boot.

    This test was conducted by coasting downhill with heel free and toe lever locked out then ramming ski tip into sastrugi. The toe did NOT release.
    Thanks for playing "crash test dummy" and unraveling this, Lee!

    It will be interesting to see Fritschi's position on this, as well as whether these gen. 1 (gen. 4?) Evo/Tecton toe pieces will go back for updates this Summer.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  15. #340
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    18,790
    I could count the number of skinning falls I have had on both hands, I am sure the shells will punch back out. Seems a design flaw but hopefully LeeL will share his info from Fritschi.

    We are not getting this kind of feedback from anyone on shifts.
    watch out for snakes

  16. #341
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,643
    I wonder how much testing Salomon does compared to fritschi. Alkasquauwlik made it sound like Salomon puts a lot of time in to testing the bindings. Maybe the issue is that companies test with industry guys that are generally good skiers. If the fritschi team is half as best as I am, I doubt anyone on their team fell forward. Also does fritschi test with multiple brands of boots? Does Salomon only test with Salomon boots...?

  17. #342
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Swiss alps -> Bozone,MT
    Posts
    685

    Fritschi Tecton

    Yeah cause there ain't anyone on Shifts yet.

    Kinda shit when you have to finish your tour with curled up toes..... for 600 bucks

  18. #343
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,316
    Some basic pre-launch multi-brand boot testing should've easily highlighted this.

  19. #344
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by daught View Post
    I wonder how much testing Salomon does compared to fritschi. Alkasquauwlik made it sound like Salomon puts a lot of time in to testing the bindings. Maybe the issue is that companies test with industry guys that are generally good skiers. If the fritschi team is half as best as I am, I doubt anyone on their team fell forward. Also does fritschi test with multiple brands of boots? Does Salomon only test with Salomon boots...?
    It sucks as a consumer, and I want to take this opportunity to thank all of you 2017/18 paying beta testers for your selfless service ;-) Unfortunately (unlike software), you can't just download an update :-(

    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    Some basic pre-launch multi-brand boot testing should've easily highlighted this.
    If I read Lee's comments correctly, this isn't boot-specific, but rather a "feature" of the toe being in walk mode. Well, they tried to work around the two bumper system of the previous versions, but not successfully.

    I get that everyone misses something, no matter how diligent they are (and I'm a big fan of Fritschi), but missing this one was a bad move.

    I wonder if the Fritschi testers consider walk mode to be unnecessary? Obviously, if the walk mode position exists, it needs to be tested - something that could have easily been uncovered on the bench - even before field testing.

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 12-21-2017 at 05:51 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  20. #345
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,316
    Quote Originally Posted by galibier_numero_un View Post
    .......If I read Lee's comments correctly, this isn't boot-specific, but rather a "feature" of the toe being in walk mode.....
    My bad, for some reason I'd interpretted it as boot specific but a front impact is obviously going to happen to every boot, the only boot specific element will be how bad the damage is.

    And yes, not being boot specific really makes the issue (error) worse.

    I know that Dynafit have had their 1st gen issues on models & that Marker had an initial Kingpin issue but I was skiing a pre-production Beast & Kingpin a season before they were released. And it's well documented how long Salomon have been working on their tech offerings.

    I remember the Vipec being launched at ISPO a couple of years ago and they were asking for dealer orders for Autumn delivery when all they had at the show was a crappy 3D printed model. There was no way they were going to have a properly tested binding in time and now 4/5 generations later they've got another major problem. My take on it was that after years of selling their frame bindings against tech bindings that Fritschi new they had to get in to the tech game real quick or die so everything was rushed & it appears to be the case here too. I think they have an elegant design but they've just not done the ground work.

  21. #346
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    .. I think they have an elegant design but they've just not done the ground work.
    Well the 2nd and 3rd generation vipecs have almost zero problems and lots of people using them successfully.

    I dont disagree with your points but a solid design and manufacturing process has proved itself for BD/fritschi for some of their binding generations.
    Common sense. So rare today in America it's almost like having a superpower.

  22. #347
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,180
    So...maybe the move is to pair my vipec black toe with the tecton heel?
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  23. #348
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Whoa. I've been skiing pow so haven't followed up with Fritschi yet.

    I described the circumstance on how the boot impact occurred precisely so you all could see how it occurred. As meterman and CLong so ( sarcastically ) remarked, it's rare but it can happen. I did this before contacting Fritschi because you all as paying consumers should know about it, and how it occurred so you can decide for yourself whether to go/no-go with Tecton as opposed to the timelag of waiting for a response.

    Now take a look at the older black Vipec toe from last model year. The toe contact on the older Vipecs were lower profile. It's noteworthy that the boot dent issue could not happen in a knee fall on older Vipecs toes

    My next to-do

    1. Go to a shop and see if the lower profile toe bumps on the older Black Vipecs can be swapped onto newer Tecton and Evo toes. I think they can. The Tecton toe bump looks like they're held on by press fit pins which can be punched

    2. Get hold of Fritschi/BD and see if this is a known issue and can be resolved.

    Btw full disclosure. I am reviewing this binding and this will be part of the review







    Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

  24. #349
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    6,770
    On the Black toe, the boot contacts the swappable bumper and directly pushes the toe lever down to open the wings. Simple.

    On the Evo/Tecton, the boot pushes a sliding cam mechanism, which in turn pushes down the toe lever. The cam mechanism is probably intended to reduce the amount of boot force needed to lower the toe lever so that adjusting for a specific boot with the assortment of bumpers isn't required, but something is going wrong.

    Hopefully the solution is as simple as greasing these small moving parts so they don't freeze together or hang up. I'll take a closer look sometime in the next week.
    Last edited by 1000-oaks; 12-23-2017 at 10:43 PM.

  25. #350
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by 1000-oaks View Post
    On the Black toe, the boot contacts the swappable bumper and directly pushes the toe lever down to open the wings. Simple.

    On the Evo/Tecton, the boot pushes a sliding cam mechanism, which in turn lowers the toe lever. There are several moving parts in this assembly between the boot and the lever. The cam mechanism is probably intended to reduce the amount of boot force needed to lower the toe lever so that adjusting for a specific boot with the assortment of bumpers isn't required, but something is going wrong.

    Hopefully the solution is as simple as greasing these small moving parts so they don't freeze together or hang up. I'll take a closer look sometime in the next week.
    Thanks for that!

    I got curious as to whether the bumper would actuate the release with my Black toes with the lever flipped up to walk mode. It does (I never fell forward in walk mode).

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •