Finally, I get JONG'd. Feels good to be back on TGR again. My bad, but those other threads are just GHEY. I figgered if I showed mtngirl MINE , she'd show me hers. Something tells me even a bikini shot wouldn't happen. I'm thinking a one piece with that lil skirt sewn in that the old fat ladies in florida like to wear to the pool.
Bacon tastes good. Pork chops taste goood.
well it has been an entertaining couple of days
thank you mtngrl. you must be pleased that once again you are the center of attention
close, Kalmus Beach in Hyannis. the funniest part of these pics is that there's some woods behind it, we call it Pickle Park. Like a rest area for perverts soliciting homeless freaks for BJs . I dunno, but it's been going on for a long time, and they won't go away.walking in there to take a piss is...daunting.
I took some pics over at Chapin the other day, next to sandy neck. I can post a few.
Bacon tastes good. Pork chops taste goood.
^ it is a great dislike of mtngrl
no matter how you put it, most women I know find female porn objectifying
Following up on KQ's points: A few years ago I heard Gloria Steinem, one of history's great champions of women's rights, on NPR's Fresh Air. Steinem spoke of the distinction between erotica (which celebrates the human form and lovemaking) and pornography (which demeans the female human form and fucking). Steinem said she sometimes views erotica and enjoys it, while she abhors pornography. Her argument was lucid and persuasive.
Not all nudity is pornography. Indeed, most nudity is not pornography. Our culture's collective repression and puritanical shaming of our natural naked state enables pornographers. When we view the female form as beautiful and something to be celebrated and admired, we disarm the pornographers.
Of course, the line between erotica and pornography is a subjective one, thus there's no practicable way to construct a rule allowing the former and banning the latter.
ETA: Link to Gloria Steinem's article entitled Erotica and Pornography: A Clear and Present Difference, first published in Ms. Magazine: http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/ws301/html/steinem.html
Maybe but she's stuck with the mentality of an abused Pend Oreille valley girl.
I think most people agree with her stance on the victimization of women but she internalizes it all and lacks the ability to be objective about it because she believes that she's a victim, rightly so in the case of her father and CSW. For the most part she's preaching to the choir and doesn't realize that her approach to these issues isn't compatible with a reasonable dialogue. Of course there are those here that aggravate this problem and that is how we arrived where we now stand.
She said it's no big deal. If that's what she truly believes, it should be no big deal.
How is that being an asshole?
I'm torn by what I want her to do.
On one hand, I don't want her to post herself up because that would prove me wrong.
On the other, it would be fucking awesome and I would have a ton more respect for her if she did.
Geez I should've recognized that, I've been right there a million times (but not in Pickle Park!). I grew up half the time about a mile or so away from there, on Bay Shore Rd. in Hyannis, near the docks, kind of behind The Mooring (where The Raw Bar is now), on the harbor.
Bookmarks