Check Out Our Shop
Page 32 of 72 FirstFirst ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... LastLast
Results 776 to 800 of 1780

Thread: Binding Mount Paper Templates

  1. #776
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    50 miles E of Paradise
    Posts
    16,932
    Jon, are the Guardian heel BSL alignment marks backwards on the template?

    Seems like the marks should be largest at the top (closest to tip) and get smaller toward the center of the template.

    I did a search on this thread but didn't come up with an answer

    What am I missing here?

  2. #777
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    79
    Any one have the new salomon STH WTR pattern, they changed the heel piece pattern

  3. #778
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Funland
    Posts
    1,848
    Does anyone know where the print scaling options went for windows 8?

    edit:
    Window's "reader' app (default to open a PDF) sucks and doesn't give you the option. Had to go through Adobe Acrobat and all was right.

  4. #779
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,288
    Does anyone have a Plum Yak template? Their website is down and a few minutes of internet searching has turned up a whole bunch of nothing.

  5. #780
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by telebobski View Post
    Jon, are the Guardian heel BSL alignment marks backwards on the template?

    Seems like the marks should be largest at the top (closest to tip) and get smaller toward the center of the template.

    I did a search on this thread but didn't come up with an answer

    What am I missing here?
    Because the Guardian is a frame design, the position of the heelpiece doesn't change relative to the toe (which determines the midsole position). Therefore the markings for the heel are the same as for the toe, so the marking are correct. I used them and they were perfect. Be really carefull during mounting that you poperly align the heel with the toe, or the locking mechanism might give you some headache...

  6. #781
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Spearfish, SD
    Posts
    212
    anyone have issues with the salomon template? just used it and the heel piece rear screws are a few millimeters short of the actual length.

  7. #782
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,879
    My little contribution back to Jon's efforts. I created a GIMP file for the Heel and Toe patterns with transparent layers, so that you look for binding conflicts without having to print up a bunch of pieces of paper on tracing paper, or trying to use backlighting. To deal with different BSLs, just duplicate the layer, select all, and move it accordingly.

    Toe patterns:
    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_dF...it?usp=sharing

    Heel patterns:
    https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_dF...it?usp=sharing

    (GIMP is basically an open source, free version of Adobe Photoshop.)

    Jon, do whatever you wish with them and feel free to put them on your website, as it was essentially created with your contributions. If you can, provide links to these files on the original post. For some reason, I couldn't add them as attachments on TGR. It doesn't let me upload XCF files.

  8. #783
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,349
    heh awesome, I've been doing this a lot in gimp the last few weeks. this'll be appreciated greatly by those willing to download gimp.

  9. #784
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,879
    Added letters to identify which binding is which. This also allows you to print up and use one single piece of paper for binding identification on a ski that you have no prior mounting knowledge of (also can help you identify mount position and BSL).

    Here are the PDF's for letter-based binding identification:
    Toe.pdf
    Heel.pdf

    T = Tyrolia
    P = Axial
    A = Axial2/PX
    F = FKS/Pivot
    S = Salomon
    D = Duke (old)
    E = Duke EPF (new)
    J = Jester
    V = Dynafit Vertical (old)
    R = Dynafit Radical (new)
    Last edited by Lindahl; 11-04-2013 at 05:41 PM.

  10. #785
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    50 miles E of Paradise
    Posts
    16,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Naets View Post
    Because the Guardian is a frame design, the position of the heelpiece doesn't change relative to the toe (which determines the midsole position). Therefore the markings for the heel are the same as for the toe, so the marking are correct. I used them and they were perfect. Be really carefull during mounting that you poperly align the heel with the toe, or the locking mechanism might give you some headache...
    Ahhh - Got it - thanks. Seems pretty obvious when you put it that way...

  11. #786
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2
    I've printed out the guardian template, and the scale on the side matches up great, but when I look at the BSL marks, its seems like they increase by 10mm, but they're marked as though its 20mm (i.e the distance between the 320-340 is only 10mm when I measure it)
    Can anyone clear that up for me?

  12. #787
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    1,175
    Quote Originally Posted by maladjusted_vagabond View Post
    I've printed out the guardian template, and the scale on the side matches up great, but when I look at the BSL marks, its seems like they increase by 10mm, but they're marked as though its 20mm (i.e the distance between the 320-340 is only 10mm when I measure it)
    Can anyone clear that up for me?
    That is because the toe template and the heel template are each only half of the footprint of the boot.

    For instance, if your boot increased BSL by 20 mm, you would only move the toe 10 mm forward and the heel 10 mm backwards to keep your midsole on the line.

  13. #788
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    1,175
    Has anyone else found that the Head/Tyrolia Mojo/Peak template puts you like 5-7 mm forward of the line? I used it last year and found this to be the case even after triple checking things. Can anyone confirm this or whether or not it's been amended (or maybe I still fucked up even after triple checking)?

  14. #789
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by whatsupdoc View Post
    That is because the toe template and the heel template are each only half of the footprint of the boot.

    For instance, if your boot increased BSL by 20 mm, you would only move the toe 10 mm forward and the heel 10 mm backwards to keep your midsole on the line.
    Ahh that makes sense thanks

  15. #790
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    a swamp
    Posts
    633
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    Added letters to identify which binding is which. This also allows you to print up and use one single piece of paper for binding identification on a ski that you have no prior mounting knowledge of (also can help you identify mount position and BSL).

    Here are the PDF's for letter-based binding identification:
    Toe.pdf
    Heel.pdf

    T = Tyrolia
    P = PX/Axial
    A = Axial2
    F = FKS
    S = Salomon
    D = Duke (old)
    E = Duke EPF (new)
    J = Jester
    V = Dynafit Vertical (old)
    R = Dynafit Radical (new)


    This so cool and useful, thanks a lot for cramming it all together, I'm printing it out now

    I'm sort of curious where Jons plate screw holes fall but since they are wider then any possible conflict I guess it doesn't matter

    ----edit

    So which one is the pivot?
    Last edited by daviski; 11-03-2013 at 05:18 PM.
    you know there ain't no devil,
    there's just God when he's drunk---- Tom Waits

  16. #791
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,879
    FKS = Pivot

  17. #792
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    2,128
    Remounting some skis I have - they are mounted with Marker M14s. Anyone have a template?
    "...if you're not doing a double flip cork something, skiing spines in Haines, or doing double flip cork somethings off spines in Haines, you're pretty much just gaping."

  18. #793
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1
    Does anyone know how different the hole patterns for a duke vs m12 touring are?

  19. #794
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Where the climate suits my clothes.
    Posts
    5,603
    Quote Originally Posted by Lindahl View Post
    Added letters to identify which binding is which. This also allows you to print up and use one single piece of paper for binding identification on a ski that you have no prior mounting knowledge of (also can help you identify mount position and BSL).

    Here are the PDF's for letter-based binding identification:
    Toe.pdf
    Heel.pdf

    T = Tyrolia
    P = Axial
    A = Axial2/PX
    F = FKS/Pivot
    S = Salomon
    D = Duke (old)
    E = Duke EPF (new)
    J = Jester
    V = Dynafit Vertical (old)
    R = Dynafit Radical (new)
    Awesome resource, thanks!

    Would love to see the various plates (sollyfit, dynaduke, etc..) added to the mix if you get a chance.

  20. #795
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Veldmanmiller View Post
    Does anyone know how different the hole patterns for a duke vs m12 touring are?
    Marker Tour12 has the same pattern as the Duke. (Except the new Duke EPF, which is different.) (Also worth noting that both the Tour and Duke come in two sizes, SM and LG)

  21. #796
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Drinking Coldies
    Posts
    42
    Just finished my first mount without a jig. Look PX 18 XXL paper template worked cherry! Stoked on it! Love the thread
    It's all fun shenanigans until someone gets belligerent and pisses in your boots.


    Huckacliffy Spin

  22. #797
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    2,128
    Mounted skis for the first time tonight - big thanks to Jondrums for the tools. Anyone else feel the heel pattern on the Radical is slightly off? On both bindings I got 3 of 4 holes bang on but the same hole (rear left) was just slightly off on both - when centre punched the hole wanted to line up just outside where it should have. All other holes went smoothly. Anyone else encounter this?
    "...if you're not doing a double flip cork something, skiing spines in Haines, or doing double flip cork somethings off spines in Haines, you're pretty much just gaping."

  23. #798
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    362
    Has anyone mounted a pair of the new STH13's? Is the hole pattern the same as the old Salomon template?

  24. #799
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    2,524
    Quote Originally Posted by billyhoyle View Post
    Has anyone mounted a pair of the new STH13's? Is the hole pattern the same as the old Salomon template?
    Different pattern. No template on this thread yet. But measurements are posted over at: http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...bindings/page3

  25. #800
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    362
    Beauty, thanks for the link.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •