
Originally Posted by
StanWagon
Surprise: I am actually a Canadian. First 20 years in Canada, rest in US. There are big differences between the two countries, and big differences across Canada. But that is another subject. Let me return to the point that interests me in a slightly different way, since we have some European readers:
As noted, there is no question in the US that the units of storey, football field, and State of Rhode Island have become de facto units of height (10 ft), length (100 yds or meters), and area. Is this just because:
1. The American public is assumed too stupid to understand 300 feet or 3,000,000 acres.
2. The American public is indeed too stupid to understand big things without such helping units [[This is a problem in evolution and geology -- the numbers are so large that they are indeed difficult to understand. I liked the reminder of the LOC unit, for amt. of info in the Library of Congress.]]
3. The new units are essential to communicate the distances, etc. involved? (Generally my view, much as I hate the choice of units, since buildings and football fields are 3- and 2-dimensional objects, so should not be used for 1-dimensional units as length and height.)
Question: Have such "new" units evolved in Europe as well? Canada?
PS: Yes, there was a rocket error to Mars (or maybe the sun) and the Canadian fuel error, but those were conversion errors, speaking to the problem of having two systems in use, not the question of which system is better. And, yes, the argument that the rest of the world is metric is an argument in favor, just as English use is slowly but inexorably increasing in overall use despite being a more complicated language with silly grammar compared to other languages.
Yes, we use the football field (soccer of course), storeys and 'french department' units in France. That's because we're dumb too.
To use time for distance is not dumb IMO. It is often more pertinent as it takes into account the mean of transportation and the context, because the question is actualy 'how long ?' rather than 'how far ?'
I live 20 minutes from where I work, as I commute by bike. That would be 45 minutes by car, 60 minutes by metro / bus. The 15 kms are mostly irrelevant to me. The hour I save every day with my moto is not.
"Typically euro, french in particular, in my opinion. It's the same skiing or climbing there. They are completely unfazed by their own assholeness. Like it's normal." - srsosbso
Bookmarks