Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: So, what is faster?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado Cartel HQ
    Posts
    15,931

    So, what is faster?

    You have a 5,000 mile long fiber optic line, and a 5,000 mile long copper cable.

    Which one has faster data transmission?

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Bend, WA
    Posts
    741
    With or without repeaters/regens? (Tricky Q)

    Generally, an all optical transimssion will take longer than an electrical one.
    But, bits per second on Optical is very very very high compared to copper.

    Speed of light in fiber optic glass (IOR = 1.465) roughly 127,000 vs 186,000 miles per second in a vacum.

    Speed of electric current in copper depends on the wiresize. The speed of Speed of electric voltage potential is pretty darn close to 186,000 speed of light.
    Last edited by TomK; 03-26-2007 at 11:50 AM.
    Good runs when you get them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado Cartel HQ
    Posts
    15,931
    Quote Originally Posted by TomK View Post
    With or without repeaters/regens?
    This isn't a trick question, so let's leave "repeaters/regens" out of the equation.
    They would add too many inconsistent variables. Let's image both lines have no attenuation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456
    copper will be heavier, that's for sure

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Skiattle
    Posts
    7,750
    well if there is no attenuation at all, then isnt it equivalent to asking whether light or an electron can move faster in a vaccuum?

    anyway
    lights velocity = c
    electron drift velocity in copper ~ .6c

    there something im missing?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    People's Republic of Shitshow
    Posts
    7,581
    Im gonna go with fiber-optics. Light travels faster, and goes a much furthur distance through fiber optic cable w/o needing to have the signal boosted.

    Copper is great shorter distances, but 5k miles is gonna really bring alot of resistance into the mix

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Bend, WA
    Posts
    741
    Sorry, I was editing while you were answering See edited reply for the answer.

    Short A - Glass is slower than copper on a bit by bit end to end basis.
    This is why we in telecom struggle with echo control issues when changing circuits from a microwave or copper path to a glass one.

    Glass offers MUCH higher bits per second though.

    So, it depends on what you mean by "faster data transmission".
    Copper is faster bit by bit, but glass is capable of many more bits per second.
    Last edited by TomK; 03-26-2007 at 11:58 AM.
    Good runs when you get them.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars
    Posts
    3,857
    Ton said what I was going to say

    1 bit - Copper wins
    bazillion bits - glass wins
    You are what you eat.
    ---------------------------------------------------
    There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    my own private idaho
    Posts
    2,458
    I will say the fiber optic because some scum bag came along and stole the copper right out of the ground for salvage.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Land of Little Snow
    Posts
    1,041
    The problem with fiber, as I understand it, is that the switches converting light back into bits are the bottleneck in the system. Once the switches are improved, the benefits of fiber will become larger. I'm no engineer though.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleHoar View Post
    I will say the fiber optic because some scum bag came along and stole the copper right out of the ground for salvage.
    Probably but although the switches aren't great, FibreOpitic will make up for that time by the time it takes getting from start to finish.

    I conclude....FibreOpitic
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by edg
    What does the U.S. do with ter'rists?

    edg


    We elect them to office of course!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    West Coast of the East Coast
    Posts
    8,030
    Right now, or 5 years from now?

    Right now- Copper. Fiber is terminated with copper at the end, in most situations, except really high end.

    5 years from now-

    Depends on how strong the Copper lobbyists are, and what the next big thing will be. Cat7 or above by then?


    Note- I am only basing this on in-home use, so most of this is wrong for high end data centers and the like. Everyday use for the residential fiber is still copper throughout the house.
    I like living where the Ogdens are high enough so that I'm not everyone's worst problem.- YetiMan

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado Cartel HQ
    Posts
    15,931
    Quote Originally Posted by TomK View Post
    Sorry, I was editing while you were answering See edited reply for the answer.

    Short A - Glass is slower than copper on a bit by bit end to end basis.
    This is why we in telecom struggle with echo control issues when changing circuits from a microwave or copper path to a glass one.

    Glass offers MUCH higher bits per second though.

    So, it depends on what you mean by "faster data transmission".
    Copper is faster bit by bit, but glass is capable of many more bits per second.
    Ding ding ding!

    Good answer. Fiber can carry much more info, but is slower than copper.
    The reason is the light has to travel further. Why?
    Because you can't send light directly into the fiber, or else it reflects just like when you shine a flashlight directly into a car window at night...it reflects right back at you...so the light has to be lasered into the fiber at an angle. The light bounces off the sides of the fiber the entire way, so it covers a much longer area than a signal on copper.

    I learned that today and thought I would share.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,755
    The airplane will take off. I think.

    ... oh wait, wrong thread?
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Bend, WA
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by BlurredElevens View Post
    Ding ding ding!

    Good answer. Fiber can carry much more info, but is slower than copper.
    The reason is the light has to travel further. Why?
    Because you can't send light directly into the fiber, or else it reflects just like when you shine a flashlight directly into a car window at night...it reflects right back at you...so the light has to be lasered into the fiber at an angle. The light bounces off the sides of the fiber the entire way, so it covers a much longer area than a signal on copper.

    I learned that today and thought I would share.
    Close but not complete.
    Internal fiber reflection does add to the total distance the light travels, but the speed of light thru glass is significantly lower than the speed of potential thru a conductor and that's the biggest reason that it's slower on a bit by bit basis.

    The reflections that happen when light passes from material with one IOR to another is called Fresnel Reflection. As long as light is angled at more than the critical angle (Crit angle depends on the difference between the IORs), most of it will make it thru the boundry and only a small amount is reflected. If the angle is less than that critical angle, 100% of the light gets reflected off. Think of looking west at water. As long as the sun's rays hit the water at a steep angle you can see down into it, but when the sun gets low on the horizon and the angle is lesss, it gets reflected and causes glare.

    Fiber glass is made up of two flavors with slightly different IORs and the signal light angles hit this boundry at less than the critical angle, so thats what causes the 100% internal reflection. IF you bend fiber into a small enough circle (think of wrapping it around a pencil) the light hits the boundry layer at a steeper than critical angle and starts to "leak" out of the core and gets lost. This is called a macrobend impairment.

    Fiber connectors put the light as close to 0 degrees offset (90 degrees to the plane of connection) to maximize the light transfer.

    Fiber connections do cause a small amount of reflection and this can be seen with a piece of test equipment called an Optical Time Domain Reflectometer (OTDR). It's used to locate the splices and connections in a fiber route as well as to finding how far away a break is (Breaks cause huge reflections). Splicing tech has gotten so good over the last 10 years that they are often invisible and lossless now, but connectors are still easy to see.
    Good runs when you get them.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    driven way past the Stop and Shop
    Posts
    3,073
    I had FIOS (Verizon Fiber Optic) installed at the Obstruction manse yesterday and that sumbitch is as fast as stink.
    Damn, we're in a tight spot!

  17. #17
    bklyn is offline who guards the guardians?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,762
    tech talk, jong!
    I'm just a simple girl trying to make my way in the universe...
    I come up hard, baby but now I'm cool I didn't make it, sugar playin' by the rules
    If you know your history, then you would know where you coming from, then you wouldn't have to ask me, who the heck do I think I am.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ventura Highway in the Sunshine
    Posts
    22,445
    Quote Originally Posted by bklyn View Post
    tech talk, jong!
    /\/\/\Best answer yet

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Tech Bro Central
    Posts
    3,288
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
    Probably but although the switches aren't great, FibreOpitic will make up for that time by the time it takes getting from start to finish.

    I conclude....FibreOpitic
    The switches aren't great? Are you kidding me? Have you ever tried to make one of those things?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    4,956
    is this one of those "popcorn" threads? let's be real, it's not even summer yet.
    Balls Deep in the 'Ho

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    4,394
    The optical by far. You can put at least 64 wavelengths of light on it at once time each carrying a data tranfer rate of OC192 (10GBps). Think 10GBps*64 wavelengths and you have an obvious winner

    You need to use DWDM technology but you can transmit WAY more information on fiber than copper.
    Last edited by Crass3000; 03-26-2007 at 10:19 PM.

  22. #22
    GI JONG Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by 13 View Post
    is this one of those "popcorn" threads? let's be real, it's not even summer yet.
    Hey cock-muzzle. This is the padded room.

  23. #23
    GI JONG Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Crass3000 View Post
    The optical by far. You can put at least 64 wavelengths of light on it at once time each carrying a data tranfer rate of OC192 (10GBps). Think 10GBps*64 wavelengths and you have an obvious winner
    Dude, it's already official. You're retarded. The group has already agreed that the plane will fly.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    4,394
    Quote Originally Posted by GI JONG View Post
    Dude, it's already official. You're retarded. The group has already agreed that the plane will fly.
    I think this is first time I feel the need to pull out the douchnozzle word and direct it at anybody. Somebody had to be first. Don't feel bad.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    4,956
    Quote Originally Posted by GI JONG View Post
    Hey cock-muzzle. This is the padded room.
    pipe down and go get my beer, bitch.
    Balls Deep in the 'Ho

Similar Threads

  1. Which is faster...
    By truth in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-18-2005, 08:15 PM
  2. Gettin drunk faster by SNorting it?
    By HRDCORESNOWRIDE in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 07-26-2005, 11:45 AM
  3. Faster?
    By Owens Never Sleeps in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-30-2004, 09:05 AM
  4. Dammit, I need a faster computer
    By Telenater in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-13-2004, 12:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •