Sante Fe
Perhaps we should divide the list into two groups. Those that Are allergic to rain and desire blinding, unrelenting sun and all times; and those who don't mind a little damp and gloom in the winter.
That said, constant drizzle can be a drag. However I find the endless soCal sun to be worse.
rossland bc
the g spot in co
logan ut
bogota colombia
incline village nv
Last edited by Pablo Escobar; 03-14-2007 at 04:25 PM. Reason: cuz i'm a moron
Top of the Food Chain for White Trash America
Some of the people in this thread are having a hard time grasping the concept of "city".
You are forgetting that you also need a job with tremendous flexibility to do that. I have a job with tremendous flexibility for a 9-5er, get out every weekend, use every spare day I can, and live less than 90 miles from the mountains. Yet I still only get between 50-60 days. To say it's not hard to reach 60-100 while flying from NYC means you are not working the Mon-Fri 40hr or more a week grind. Not saying you don't work that many hours, but you clearly have more felxibility than most.
You forgot to mention that while you not only need very flexible schedule covering the countless flights booked at the last minute in addition to the cost of living in NYC and possibly numerous day tickets you are talking about needing a pretty enormous salary.
Feel free to call me on that one Trayc. But maybe you're just the most frugal person I've never met? Cool that you make it work, however.
Hey you fackin chowdaheads, wheyah the fack ya gettin ya info, kids?
Straight from the City of Boston's website (http://www.cityofboston.gov):
Boston was first incorporated as a town in 1630, and later as a city in 1822.
Or is this some inside joke and Im a big phat JONG?
Do you mean "in the east because its away from the mountains"? Or "in areas of the east that are away from any mountains"? Cuz if its number 1, I think you need to brush up on your geography, bhub. If its number 2, I wholeheartedly agree.
And I wholeheartedly second tripledoublestampsies Christchurch. LOVE that place. Although if Boston isnt a city, Cheech must be classified as a few mud huts...
BTW, does Calgary have as good sushi as Vancouver???Sushi, the north shore mtb, and Whistler/Blackcomb = all you ever need in life.
A fucking show dog with fucking papers
San Francisco...because I have a hard time leaving Northern California...I do miss being only 2 hours from my mountain though...![]()
How far is SF from skiing?
Fighting leads to killing, and killing gets to warring. And that was damn near the death of us all.
3-13 hours, depending on traffic, with my average experience anywhere near a weekend being probably 6.HTML Code:How far is SF from skiing?
Anyway, surprised Portland hasn't come up more with Seattle and Vancouver mentioned so much. Drizzly in late fall, winter, and spring but that's overrated and sure beats blinding sun, heat, and brown. The summer weather is pretty much perfect. While the skiing may not be quite as good, the ski areas around Seattle and Vancouver are easily reached in a days drive or less, and you have skiing on Mt. Hood a little over an hour away. Despite the aggravations of Meadows, it sure beats having to fly somewhere or drive for hours just to ski.
Portland traffic isn't too bad and it also has some semblance of public transportation that they continue to work on. The town and beer are great (most microbreweries in the world).
Besides skiing you have the Gorge an hour away for windsurfing, kayaking, mountain biking, and the coast an hour and a half west for surfing and any other ocean stuff. Central Oregon is awesome too for vibe and pretty much anything outside, just 3-4 hours away (although Bachelor's kind flat). It's also a cheap, short flight or a long days drive from SLC or Reno. Pretty good overall balance I'd say.
Last edited by powski3; 03-14-2007 at 04:54 PM.
1. Denver, CO (metro - nowhere near the burbs)
2. Perth, AUS
Munich is a better choice, no doubt, but excuse me, Vienna is hipper and younger than Munich. For example, recent music from Vienna: Kruder & Dorfmeister, dzihan & kamien, Louie Austen, ... and nothing from Munich. Munich in fact is very very provincial as all the hipster from Berlin, Hamburg and Vienna will tell you.
And there's nothing like this place in Munich:
http://www.flex.at/
Personally, I believe I would go for Geneva, Zurich, Munich, Vancouver or San Francisco. Sydney would be close a close call, but fails on the skiing dimension. New York is cool, but, honestly, wouldn't you get tired of sitting on a plane for 4-5 hours + security checks before going skiing?
Last edited by Franz Klammer; 03-14-2007 at 05:12 PM.
Ein Berg ohne Absturzgefahr ist nur noch Attrappe. (Reinhold Messner)
Yeah, Im gonna have to agree with Dromond on this one. 60-100 days a year? From NYC? Youd either have to have a 20-hour a week job, or a regular job with ridiculously flexible hours (read three 13-hour days) and a huge salary to buy plane and lift tickets. I live within three hours of most New England resorts (Boston) and between job, family and friends, and finances, Im VERY lucky to get 30 days in. Of course, Im a middle-class working stiff, so I dont make enough to fly whenever and wherever I want to ski!![]()
But yeah, to bring this back around, I hate cities, but they allow me to afford my weapons of choice for the backcountry (BROs, VPFree, LaSportivas, etc)...
A fucking show dog with fucking papers
Hands down it'd be Denver; I'm tired of moving.
Since I do grasp what a city is, I have to say I shall not live in one ever again. I be a mountain man henceforth. The one I did choose to live in is the only one I could ever have seen myself in, SF.
I will always love that place. It's magical.
Mountains are better.![]()
I can't believe some people would not live in Vancouver or Seattle because of the rain, that would be like living in Aspen and not liking it when it snows...
I'd take a day of cold rain in Vancouver over a sunny day anytime, because it always means it's snowing in the mountains (1/2 hour away).
And if you can't find anything to do in Vancouver being there for 2 weeks, you also need to wipe the crap out of your eyes, no joke. The mountains surround the place, there are plenty of different areas to visit and explore, although there IS a lack of museums and such.
Only downside IMO is that it's far from the east coast, which has a more culturally european feel to it....
But after having lived in the Carribeans, south of France, and now here, I simply can't see myself going anywhere else to live permanently.
Even Seattle, while the people have the same mentality as up here, it doesn't have the same mountain and ocean bound, secure, and Canadian feel that Vancouver has.
I think I love your job, but please tell me how you get 100 days of skiing a year. If you assume your skiing season lasts for 6 months (november through april for instance), which is a stretch anywhere, your season lasts about 180 days. Say 10 of those 100 days are in SA in the summer, you need to ski half your days during the season. Did I say I want that job?
Oh, and I think SF/Bay Area rules. It's expensive, but I don't have to deal with much traffic (OK, I'm lucky on that one) and Tahoe is 3 hours away. I don't get a ton of days in, but my kids and family need some time, evwen in the winter. Before I had kids, 50-day seasons were about the norm.
Last edited by runethechamp; 03-14-2007 at 05:26 PM.
You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.
Bookmarks