Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: New Naxos f'ing rule!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    People's Republic of Shitshow
    Posts
    7,581

    Thumbs up New Naxos f'ing rule!

    Finally got some Naxos and mounted them on my Kingswood Mid-fats. Plain and simple they rule. Skied them inbounds on a pretty firm day at A-basin last week and they officially get the burly award. Was hitting that small huck in Falcon at mach loony and getting up to 20 feet of air onto fairly hard snow and they acted like my all metal 977s....bomber.


    Toured on them today and they killed. 6000 times better than sloprides in all categories.



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fauntleroy
    Posts
    1,556
    Are those this year's NX21s or the NX01s?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    People's Republic of Shitshow
    Posts
    7,581
    Quote Originally Posted by MrZach View Post
    Are those this year's NX21s or the NX01s?
    this years NX21s

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fauntleroy
    Posts
    1,556
    Any experience with the NX01s? I know the early versions of them had toe piece issues which were supposedly fixed on the more recent models. I'm asking 'cause I just put some '01s on some Scratches.

  5. #5
    BLOOD SWEAT STEEL Guest
    The VRS's are pretty bulletproof as well.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Trench-Town U.S.A.
    Posts
    742
    Still not as good as fritschis as far as torsional stiffness....when inside edge is pressured, outside rail 'foot' lifts off the ski. But that's only noticable on hardpack which I know you don't ski Glad to see they are bomber though...
    "Why do I always get more kisses on powder days?" -my wife

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Skiattle
    Posts
    7,750
    not that i charge or ski nearly as hard as some folks on here, but Ive been happy with the dozen or so days Ive put on my nx01s from last year. Im skiing them in AT boots as well, so take that fwiw. Skis are 186LPs and skier is 5'10 170.

    Unless you're really hard on your gear, I wouldnt worry about them.
    Like phish, I also appreciate that they ski very similar to normal alpine bindings and dont have a massive stack.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    I've watched Ptavv rail his NX01's on his VCTs, and huck with them as well. I would think they could do pretty well. Somebody posted a thread with pics of a broken heelpiece last season though.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fauntleroy
    Posts
    1,556
    I've only been on my NX01s for one day in-bounds at Jane and like them so-far. I had an unfortunate insta-tele in some tight trees when an unseen branch on a log caught the release lever. All ended up well, though, after a couple hairy turns to a stop.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Summit County
    Posts
    5,055
    Quote Originally Posted by cold_smoke View Post
    Still not as good as fritschis as far as torsional stiffness....when inside edge is pressured, outside rail 'foot' lifts off the ski. But that's only noticable on hardpack which I know you don't ski Glad to see they are bomber though...

    [cough] bullshit [/cough]
    "The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" --Margaret Thatcher

  11. #11
    BLOOD SWEAT STEEL Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by cold_smoke View Post
    Still not as good as fritschis as far as torsional stiffness....when inside edge is pressured, outside rail 'foot' lifts off the ski. But that's only noticable on hardpack which I know you don't ski Glad to see they are bomber though...
    ....Wondering how one would get his face, hands and measuring device close enough between the binding & ski while railing turns on hardpack to actually verify this......


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,146
    Quote Originally Posted by cold_smoke View Post
    Still not as good as fritschis as far as torsional stiffness....when inside edge is pressured, outside rail 'foot' lifts off the ski. But that's only noticable on hardpack which I know you don't ski Glad to see they are bomber though...
    uhh... what the hell are you talking about? (skied NX01 since they came out here in 03 and NX21s this year)
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whitefish
    Posts
    4,501
    My Naxo21's rock!! They are my only pair of bindings and I've been on the about 30 times this year touring about 2 days a week. They are bomber tough!!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Frozen Tundra
    Posts
    68
    Yup. I have been skiing with this year's NX21 on groomers and bc since before X'mas. Absolutely bomber.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    People's Republic of Shitshow
    Posts
    7,581
    Quote Originally Posted by cold_smoke View Post
    Still not as good as fritschis as far as torsional stiffness....when inside edge is pressured, outside rail 'foot' lifts off the ski. But that's only noticable on hardpack which I know you don't ski Glad to see they are bomber though...
    Huh?


    my freerides were like wearing fucking flip-flops compared to the Nx21s....

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Trench-Town U.S.A.
    Posts
    742
    Quote Originally Posted by BLOOD SWEAT STEEL View Post
    ....Wondering how one would get his face, hands and measuring device close enough between the binding & ski while railing turns on hardpack to actually verify this......
    Put boot in binding on a bench....clamp down ski....torque boot back and forth mimicing knee angulation....
    I just did this last week side-by-side with fritschis and naxos and easily observed much more torsional play (lifting of feet) on the naxo's. You can put the ski on edge, pressure the edge by pushing on the top of the boot and see a more applicable demonstration. Note that the fatter the ski, the more pronounced the problem.
    I had naxo's that I skied the resort and bc with and it was very noticable to me (I like to rail turns and feel g's), luckily I broke them (heelpiece) and got my money back.
    I'm not saying naxo's suck by any means, and I know the 21's have improved a lot on the initial shortcomings of the nx01's. just my observations, feedback on what still needs to be improved for them to be truly bomber. Take it for what it's worth...actually never mind. Probably should not have posted that on a naxo's are the best thing ever thread.
    "Why do I always get more kisses on powder days?" -my wife

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Skiattle
    Posts
    7,750
    so lets see, youre taking a binding that is not specifically designed to do something, and it ends up doing it well. sounds pretty good to me.
    do you feel that the few mm of binding compliance is really hindering your performance and ability to ski those lines with confidence? Id imagine that you're also skiing these bindings in stiff alpine boots, and thus, all the forces are concentrated at the binding, rather than more equally shared when you have a more compliant AT boot. Yet again, something the binding isnt really designed and optimized for.

    Personally, I think both bindings ski well. I prefer the naxo simply because its got a lower stack height and it doesnt make me feel 7 feet tall. While the fritschi may be more rigid in the ski\binding interface, I can almost garuntee you that the boot\binding interface is not as rigid as it is with the naxo due to the design of the toes. There are compromises with each design.

    anyway, just thought id bring up these points. thanks for being honest with us as well though. I just see it being very hard to make a reasonable weight touring binding that is as rigid as an alpine binding. At minimum it would need a fixture at the heel and under the foot to anchor the rail(s).

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,763
    Quote Originally Posted by cold_smoke View Post
    ...I just did this last week side-by-side with fritschis and naxos and easily observed much more torsional play (lifting of feet) on the naxo's...
    Which Fritsches and which Naxos?
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by MOHSHSIHd View Post
    my freerides were like wearing fucking flip-flops compared to the Nx21s....
    This has been my experience too, but Fritschis do seem to come out top in tests even if not by that much

    Link to results of Lou Dawsons test
    Last edited by EpicSteeze; 01-17-2007 at 11:10 AM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whitefish
    Posts
    4,501
    I don't even notice my Naxo21's. I stomp in and ride whatever I want and my skis stay attached to my feet just as they are supposed to. I have not noticed anything about them when I ride hardpack, powder, groomers, and small hucks. I cannot tell the difference between these bindings and any other binding I've ever used (in as far as downhill performance). I've even taken some bad falls this year and came out of my bindings exactly when I would have wanted to. They tour wonderfully and are easy to switch between downhilll and tour with my ski pole. I don't know what people are talking about with the whole "torsional rigidity" thing. I'm 6'2" 185lbs and ride fast and hard with my din at 10 and I can't tell the difference between these and my solly's from last year. I don't think I'll ever use normal bindings again!!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    125
    Ditto Meng, Nx21's are the shizzle. No doubt about it. This is my second year on them and my brother is on his second year patrolling on them. I took the lock mechanism off mine for easier touring (one less step to touring mode). Check out this vid if you do not know what I'm talking about: http://www.bcaccess.com/documents/NaxoHeelOperation.mov

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    3,519
    i personally like the lock mechanism. Probably just because i feel like it adds an extra level of saftey, but it probably doesnt do that much.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    la la land
    Posts
    5,816
    I can't remember where I saw it, but it seemed some peeps were complaining about the lack of height on the elevator at the highest setting when touring. Any truth?
    `•.¸¸.•´><((((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸.? ??´¯`•...¸><((((º>

    "Having been Baptized by uller his frosty air now burns my soul with confirmation. I am once again pure." - frozenwater

    "once i let go of my material desires many opportunities for playing with the planet emerge. emerge - to come into being through evolution. ok back to work - i gotta pack." - Slaag Master

    "As for Flock of Seagulls, everytime that song comes up on my ipod, I turn it up- way up." - goldenboy

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by cold_smoke View Post
    ... and easily observed much more torsional play (lifting of feet) on the naxo's...
    the pivot bolt housings can wear down and cause some slop in the toepiece. With the extra play, one of my pivot bolts sheared.

    BCA did me right and replaced the toe pieces. this removed the slop up front, but things are a little loose where the rails fit into the tailpiece.

    This little gap allows for some torsional play - that's probably what cold_smoke is talking about. I've haven't been back to BCA to see if they have a fix.

Similar Threads

  1. Forest Roadless Rule Reversed
    By Lone Star in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 144
    Last Post: 05-02-2007, 11:03 PM
  2. When the shit goes down, please remember the 1st rule of a rescuer
    By hop in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 02:32 PM
  3. Wedding Crashers
    By CS in forum MUSIC, BOOKS, MOVIES
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 12-12-2005, 02:49 PM
  4. Breck did not suck today (but my naxos did)
    By nealric in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-15-2005, 09:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •