...what's taking its place with CMH and the rest of the Heli and Cat ops?
...what's taking its place with CMH and the rest of the Heli and Cat ops?
Nevermind. Dumb question. http://www.cmhski.com/ski/first_timers/equipment/
Who said anything about cutting edge? I was wondering what cheap, used pow ski was going to replace the Explosivs with the dirtbag/'troller/granola crowd.
Speaking of that, does anyone think that used CMH Heli-Daddies will fill the void left by the Exploders? Seems to me that the Daddies might not be as versatile. Could be wrong though.
Last edited by Blashyrkh; 01-02-2007 at 03:53 PM. Reason: speelling
Did not know about that length...The Heli-Daddy is very forgiving in all snow conditions and is the number one choice among guides and guests. It comes in 150, 160, 170, 180 and 190 centimetre lengths.![]()
Do what you like, Like what you do.
I'm talking about the used market. Ever notice how patrollers and other granola type people are riding on used CMH boards? I'm just wondering if we'll start seeing these people riding the CMH Helidaddy once their explosivs bite the dust.
And since I'm talking about CMH skis in the used market, Mantra's don't figure into the equation because CMH are not using them. Therefore, we won't see hundreds of used CMH mantras being sold by folks like Mtlion every year, instead, we'll see hundreds of used CMH Helidaddies. Hence, my question.
So, anyways, that was a pretty weak JONGing, douche.
I thought Heli-daddies were softer than Explosivs. Maybe LPs? To each their own.
sugar= semi twin, rounded tail
pimp=full twin, rounded tail
heli=no twin, flat tail
That's what I meant: LPs as a heir apparent to Explosivs.
My 180 Helidaddies aren't all that stiff (I drive 'em with dynafits), and are relatively easy to ski. I'd say about the same stiffness as my 180 explosivs in the middle and tail but with more camber (my explosivs have none). They've got plenty of days on them and aren't dead... Atomics are pretty durable. The construction isn't comparable to a traditional foam core.
They're pretty good at everything, but I don't love 'em. I think they need a taller tip, but other than that they make a great touring ski.
long live the explosiv!
old plated sugar = stiff all thru
newer plateless sugar = soft tip and bit softer everywhere.
ditto
thats why I sold mine
I liked the soft tip in powder, but on everything else it felt like there was a hinge right infront of my toe. Wish they evened out the tapaered\progressive flex a bit more. 2nded on very easy to ski because of the soft shovel. I also wasnt hugely impressed with hardsnow grip but that could most definitely be an issue of a tune.
heli daddies make good touring skis, softer tip then the explosive but really stiff underfoot and stiff tail
For sure, you have to be lost to find a place that can't be found, elseways everyone would know where it was
My sugardaddys have the plate.
They actually are rather stiff torsionally and have great edge grip. They are funny though. If they aren't way on edge, then they don't absorb or aren't very smooth ala LP. Very light and stiffer than most people give them credit for, but remember mine have the full plate which I think makes a bit of difference as MntLion says. They actually have pretty dang good edge grip though when put on edge. I skied them and the LP back to back early season on hard packed man made Mammoth groomers in early december and the edge grip is surprisingly similar. TOTALLY different feel however so don't think I'm saying they are an LP. Much lighter, but they are torsionally stiff so hold an edge surprisingly well... I actually thought they were far more torsionally stiff than the Bro, but I only skied one of Vet's demo Bro's that were pretty used...
He who has the most fun wins!
Bookmarks