Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Ski lift eats girl

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595

    Unhappy Ski lift eats girl

    Not sure if this is a rerun but holy crap. RIP.


    "A horrific accident involving a 'magic carpet' type ski lift has caused the death of a 7 year old girl in the ski resort of Val Cenis in the Maurienne valley in France. The accident occured on Saturday afternoon at 15h45. The horizontal lift known as “le Renardeau“ consists of a 120 metre rolling band and is used to assist skiers getting to the main lift area. Brand new, it was only installed on December 15th and had been checked by a technician on the morning of the accident.

    The cause of the accident is yet to be established. The young girl was dragged into the small space between the moving band and the end of the lift. Her 14 year old brother tried to free the girl but was unable to help and injured his hand. Another person managed to stop the moving carpet.
    Rescue workers were rapidly on the scene. There was just an arm and the upper body visible when they arrived. One of the rescuers tried to give heart massage and mouth to mouth while the band was cut. Designed to withstand the passage of thousands of skiers this was a long and difficult operation.

    Three doctors, brought to the scene by helicopter, tried for over an hour to save the girl. The parents were also on the scene but were powerless to help. The mayor of the resort was visibly shocked by the tragedy “to see a 7 year old child die in such conditions is terrible and is something that should never have happened” he commented. The ski lifts were stopped at 11 o’clock on Sunday for a few minutes as a mark of respect for the girl.

    Moving carpets are increasing popular in the Alps. The lift was built and installed by an Italian company based in Turin. Daniel Touffait, head of piste security couldn’t understand how the accident occurred. “There are two security mechanisms, a micro-switch and two photoelectric cells that can detect the presence of a foreign body and should stop the lift instantly”. Yesterday the other lifts of the same type were in operation but under the control of a member of the piste patrol.

    Jean Charles Simiand, head of the ski lift operator’s body the SNTF said “there are around 100 of this type of lift in France, they are usually very good for children, they are not considered as ski lifts proper so are not under the same legal control.”

    There has already been a fatal accident in 2003 in Austria on a similar lift. M. Simiand commented, “Maybe there needs to be stricter legislation governing these lifts”.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    North Coast
    Posts
    2,615

    Unhappy

    My god. That's tragic.

    The family will be in my thoughts today...
    It's idomatic, beatch.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,795
    That's absolutely terrible. I hope they figure out how it happened, as they use those things all over the place for beginner/kids areas. Definitely something that shouldn't have to happen again.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    That poor girl. The poor family.

    .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    266

    Unhappy

    Holy shit that is terrible. I will never bitch about my daughter moving from the "magic carpet" at Alta to the rope tow again. Even though three hours on the rope tow at a time makes the magic carpet look very good.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    The Garden State
    Posts
    4,907

    Unhappy

    Horrible.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Logan, Utah.
    Posts
    2,053

    Thumbs down

    God dammit that stinks.

    This is one of the few cases where I think a lawsuit would be justified. A little girl on the magic carpet should not have to worry about that kind of accident. Someone made a mistake, it cost a child her life, and they should pay.

    Would you sue?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Originally posted by Twoplanker
    God dammit that stinks.

    Would you sue?
    Absolutely. Somebody should definitely pay (I'm thinking the manufacturer) for an incident of this nature, if only to make sure it desn't happen again.

    But I think I would give any money won to charity, I wouldn't want to profit from the death of a child.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars
    Posts
    3,857
    That's horrble. I can't imagine the grief/anger the parents are feeling.
    You are what you eat.
    ---------------------------------------------------
    There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ta-hoes Love Face Shots!
    Posts
    2,525

    Re: Ski lift eats girl

    “Maybe there needs to be stricter legislation governing these lifts”.
    MAYBE??!!?!?! Well, very astute of you there, Mr. Ski Lift Operator.


    What a horrible tragedy.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    125
    Sad. Absolutely horrible. Check out fifth image from top.

    http://www.rmce.com/conlif.htm

    Probably something to do with where the carpet gets rotated down to go back like with elevators. Kids are always fascinated with such things and may have been doing something abnormal. Any such things ought to be maximum kid proof. -dave

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    It's gorges here
    Posts
    950

    Post

    Originally posted by iceman
    Absolutely. Somebody should definitely pay (I'm thinking the manufacturer) for an incident of this nature, if only to make sure it desn't happen again.
    Before suing, it strikes me one should wait to find out if this was anyone's fault. Apparently the device had 3 safeguards in place to prevent this sort of thing from happening. SSSdave's pciture actually is a photo of someone demonstrating those safeguards.

    So before you sue - why did those safeguards fail?

    - Are they poorly made? (sue the manufacturer)
    - Were they not maintained well? (sue the ski area)
    - Were they switched off? (sue the operator of the carpet)
    - Or was this some sort of god-awful fluke? (sue God)

    If this was preventable, or should have been preventable had someone been paying attention, then start thinking about lawsuits. But the mentality that says, "someone's dead, quick get a lawyer!" seems a bit hasty to me.
    My dog did not bite your dog, your dog bit first, and I don't have a dog.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Originally posted by Will
    If this was preventable, or should have been preventable had someone been paying attention, then start thinking about lawsuits. But the mentality that says, "someone's dead, quick get a lawyer!" seems a bit hasty to me.
    I agree with you, Will. But whoever is at fault, if it can be determined who is at fault, has to pay. Which is pretty much what I said the first time around, I think.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •