My s2 is has treated me pretty well. Slightly bulkier than the a610 and comparable cameras (I usually wear it around my neck under my shell jacket), but I have been pretty impressed with the image quality. Lots of customizablility for if you want to learn to shoot for real. Also can take converters for wide angle and tele lenses as well as filters, which can be gotten pretty cheap. AND I can shoot in ski gloves, particularly spring gloves. Fairly big "on" button and big shutter as well as controls to change aperature and shutter speed. Smaller, more elaborate settings are harder. Battery life is pretty good with NiMH batteries. Burly little thing, too. Taken some spills, and it hasn't complained.
go to dpreview.com for some in-depth reviews on good cameras. I did a side-by-side on the s2, s3, and a-610, and the s2 was the best for me. 5.something megapixels (plenty for TGR posting and looks good on prints), 2.3 fps, super quick zoom, and lots and lots of features. Not to mention the price isn't bad. $259.98 [/plug for my camera, heh]
NOTE: The S2 is slow to track in sequence mode. You lose the subject. Something tells me this might be a setting that can be fixed, but my experience with sequence mode trying to follow a moving subject (i.e. a skier) has been much more of a spraying-bullets tactic than I would like. Summit, does your 610 do this?
If I wasn't looking for manual mode setting (ISO, aperature and shutter speed), I would have gone the route of a610. Not sure about megapixels governing image noise though. Good question. Anyone know the answer?
Canon = sweetness.
DISCLAIMER: THIS ADVICE WE HAVE GIVEN YOU REQUIRES YOU TO POST STOKE! NOW GO SHOOTING!!!
(But seriously, have fun.
)
Last edited by Deep Days; 12-07-2006 at 03:34 AM.
"I said flotation is groovy"
-Jimi Hendrix
"Just... ski down there and jump offa somethin' for cryin' out loud!!!"
-The Coolest Guy to have Ever Lived
Bookmarks