Falcon 10 vs. Endorphin

[TheDon]

Before anyone busts my balls and says "hey one boot is an AT boot an the other is a DH boot what’s the deal!? you can't compare those"

I know! These are the boots I ended up with and I will sell one of them. I just don't know which one to keep.

I ski 90% resort, I have BC gear (beacon probe shovel) but just don't get out as much as I'd like, (I'm hoping to get out more).

So I am leaning to the Falcon but damn that Endorphin is so light.

What do the Mags think?

[XtrPickels]

do you want us to hold your hand on the way to the bathroom too?

The endorphins aren't going to ski like a full alpine boot. So if you spend most of your time at a resort, keep the falcons and sell off the endorphins.

There is also the curveball of which fits/feels better...

[leroy jenkins]

Actually, I think if theres any alpine boot you could maybe compare with AT boots, the falcon would be it.

Its super light, maybe not compared to the endorphin, but for an alpine boot, its redonkulously light.

If you do a lot of resort skiing, or like to charge hard and huck super extremo gnar gnar style stuff when you go touring, go with the falcon, if it fits your foot that is. I think the falcons would be the perfect compliment to naxos, or even trekkers/solly z12s or something. They are a wierd feeling boot though, not necessarily bad, just wierd. I thought they fit my foot, until i skied in em a few days, after which I decided to sell em.

If grueling long tours get your pants tight more than cliff bands, go with the endorphins.