Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: any Atomic Janak thoughts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    377

    Question any Atomic Janak thoughts

    Up unitl know i have been a straight Alpine skier. I'm looking at getting into an AT setup. But, this year, i will probably still spend the majority of my time inbounds at Mt. Baker. I'm getting Fritchi bindings and i'm looking at the Atomic Janak. Since i will still be spending a lot of time inbounds i don't want to sacrafice any ski performance by getting a ski that's too soft. I wanted to go with the Sugar Daddy but can't get my hands on them. I have a good price on the Janak. The Janak and the Sugar are the same dimensions but how do they compare performance wise? I ski hard, like it steep, like the heavy crud that Baker gets, not much time in the park (i do like some cliff action though). Considering what i'm used to, do you think i will be dissapointed with Janak AT setup? Should i just get a straight Alpine ski & mount the Fritchis on it? Other skis i have rode and like are the Mantra & Gotama. Pocket Rocket & Seth are okay but at high speeds felt a little noodley to me.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    HELLsinki, Finland
    Posts
    3,683
    Unless I'm smoking too much crack, Janak and the same years SD are identical 'cept the graphics...
    Quote Originally Posted by RootSkier
    You should post naked pictures of this godless heathen.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Peach Pantsuit
    Posts
    1,053
    I have a pair of last year's Janak mounted with Dynafits. Only one day on them so far. They are plenty stiff, IMO. I'd give them 240 on the Iggy scale. They are pretty light too, but the jury is out on the flex pattern. I've never liked foam core skis and their "feel". These are no different. If you want light, wide, and stiff, they are a pretty good option.
    bodies be all up on my behind

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,746
    Quote Originally Posted by kzlucas View Post
    Up unitl know i have been a straight Alpine skier.
    Not that there's anything wrong with that.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    10
    Was very close at buying some myself... actually spoke with Atomics Tele Marketing Dept. and they said the flex is that of the SD - only diff is about 7% softer than SD. Others who ski say they are good in crud and stiff...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Too Far South
    Posts
    5,269
    got the heli daddies from mntlion

    nice ski, fairly light, damp, stiff enough to ski hardpack groomers but kinda lifeless. Surprisingly quick for a "big" ski, its a blast to ski in anything soft. Really good ec tree ski, because of its light weight its really easy to muscle around in the tight spots.
    For sure, you have to be lost to find a place that can't be found, elseways everyone would know where it was

Similar Threads

  1. Atomic GS-11, Race Plate Center Point?
    By CaddyDaddy77 in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-07-2007, 04:01 PM
  2. FS: Atomic & Salomon skis + bindings
    By hucksquaw in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 12:36 PM
  3. 05/06 Atomic Janak
    By mr_gyptian in forum Tech Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2005, 01:31 PM
  4. New Atomic Powder Rides Cheap& Race Spring Atomics+Others
    By skideeppow in forum Gear Swap (List View)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-24-2004, 09:33 PM
  5. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-22-2004, 08:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •