Sorry for the redundant cross post but I thought the snowboard maggs might find this information useful or interesting too. Plus I'm hoping trackhead will let me tour with him more now that I have some "real" boots.
Oh yeah...Tech Talk bizatch!
So my new (old) Oxygen boots came last week along with my new Burton Driver X boots the week before that both feature a Vibram sole (something I’ve always wanted in a snowboard boot for the bc) so I thought I’d do a little side by side comparison.
Special thanks to bcd for his public service announcement about seeing the boots on ebay! Turns out they were my exact size and going for $45. It was just too good to be true so I had to pick them up.
The Oxygen boots are from the early 90’s and feature a plastic lower shell, Vibram sole, and very soft plastic upper cuff. They barely look like they’ve ever been used and are in immaculate shape for being around 15 years old. The design provides the best of both worlds in my opinion, the benefits of a hardboot (plastic lower shell for foot protection, small footprint for climbing) with the benefits of a softboot (soft lateral flex, traditional feel, and can be used with strap bindings). So stoked.
Side profile
The Burton Driver X boots are from 06/07 and feature a ton of cool features like a stiff (pseudo leather) outer shell, speed zone lacing, vibram sole, improved toe box protection, gel cushing, thermo liner, Outlast, etc. They’re guchi.
Side profile
The sole width of the Oxygen boots are narrower that the Drivers and are much more akin to the sole of an AT boot. One of the drawbacks to regular snowboard boots in terms of backcountry and mountaineering use is the extra width of the sole. It can make foot placement more critical in sketchy situations and makes the boot have more surface are on the soles which can lead to loss of traction. The Oxygen boots also have a pointier toe which will improve climbing as well.
Sole comparison
Front profile comparison
The overall height of the boots are very similar but the Oxygen upper cuff is considerably lower. This would make more since if the cuff was really stiff like you’d expect in a plastic boot but it’s actually very soft, even softer than the Driver (softboot).
Side profile comparison
The Oxygen cuff
It’s obvious that the Oxygen’s aren’t perfect but they do have some really great attributes and I’m excited to try them. I may play with a cuff mod and morph a cuff from an old pair off soft boots on them to add some height and stiffness. They needed a modern liner as well so I promptly got rid of the retro ski boot liner and replaced them with the Driver liner. I also added a better lace.
Side profile
Front profile
Next was to compare how crampons fit on the boots. I don’t own any step-in crampons but since the Oxygen boots will accept them I'm sure I'll get a pair. I threw some Kahtoola strapies on them for now.
Side Crampon view
Sole view
Driver X
Sole view
Next was to see how the Oxygen boots fit in a modern snowboard binding. Surprisingly, they fit very well. The sole sat flat and the Burton cap-style toes straps fit great over them.
Side profile
Front profile
In terms of weight differences:
The Oxygen (with updated liner) weighs 2lbs 9oz
The Driver X with liner weights 2lbs 11oz (US mens 8.5)
For kicks the Burton C60 binding (medium) weighs 1 lbs 15 oz (with center disc but without screws)
My plan is to use the boots depending on location, conditions, and distance. I'll be sure to report back with my findings. 8)
Thanks again bcd!
Bookmarks