Check Out Our Shop
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 233

Thread: Bill Clinton pwns Fox News

  1. #126
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    BTW, TwoBuddhas still fucking hates you, he talks about you a lot, I don't think he knows where you're hiding
    Hiding? From who? From what? From that fatass?? Ha, ha, that's funny.

    If I was actually trying to hide, do you really think I would be posting here under "AstroPax"?

    -Astro

  2. #127
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,774
    no i'm not offend. i believe it is being used incorrectly to bring fear up as a further motivator. and no thats not the definition of fascism. those same quotes can be used to describe theocracies, dictatorships, and most repressive regimes.
    "a belief that the group is the victim, justifying any action without legal or moral limits."
    this sounds like the administrations approach to torture, wiretapping, Gitmo holding prisoners without due process and "military tribunals".

    i made no assumptions about your take on Bush. just your use of Fascism.

    please read: http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0828-23.htm


    -aaron

  3. #128
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    The simple facts are that not a single American or other westerner (no statement of value should be attached to that description) was killed by an Iraqi or Iraqi trained terrorist until we invaded Iraq and gave them a chance, or reason to do so.
    Wow, I guessed you missed the first Gulf War...you know...that little thing about Iraq invading Kuwait. Or are you too young to remember that one?

    -Astro

  4. #129
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,935
    Quote Originally Posted by AstroPax View Post
    Wow, I guessed you missed the first Gulf War...you know...that little thing about Iraq invading Kuwait. Or are you too young to remember that one?

    -Astro
    Prepared to bet I have a few years on you. But it's particularly difficult for me to forget since a member of my family was killed there

    Kuwait was invaded by the nation state of Iraq. No terrorism was involved.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  5. #130
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Quote Originally Posted by AstroPax View Post
    Wow, I guessed you missed the first Gulf War...you know...that little thing about Iraq invading Kuwait. Or are you too young to remember that one?

    -Astro
    He, like me, is old enough to remember the war that caused the current president to start the current war because he felt like his daddy done got dissed.

  6. #131
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by gonehuckin View Post
    no i'm not offend. i believe it is being used incorrectly to bring fear up as a further motivator.

    please read: http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0828-23.htm
    OK, thanks. I'll read your "News and Views for the Progressive Community".

    In the meantime, you should read this:

    http://www.alamut.com/subj/economics/misc/clash.html

    -Astro

  7. #132
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,774
    actually i read huntington in a freshman undergrade polysci course.

    but i appreciate the insight.

    i refered you to that editorial not because i wanted you to take everything he says a truth but more that i want you to read the definition of Fascism brought to us by those who saw it first hand.

    -aaron

  8. #133
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Point of No Return
    Posts
    2,016
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    The reports I quoted are public domain - if you're too stupid, or partisan to find them....
    Your bitterness is shortening your life...

    The simple facts are that not a single American or other westerner (no statement of value should be attached to that description) was killed by an Iraqi or Iraqi trained terrorist until we invaded Iraq and gave them a chance, or reason to do so

    ...and nobody flew airplanes into buildings until somebody flew airplanes into buildings. You can wait around for somebody to kill you before you react if you want to. But nobody ever won anything playing defense. You have to go on the offensive, if you wait until they attack you, there is a heavy price to pay.

    The three quotes I gave are quite clear.... there is and was no evidence of terrorist training camps in Iraq.
    No, that is not what the quotes said. They said that:

    1. There was no evidence that there were non-Iraqis being trained at Salman Pak after 1991.

    2. There was no credible evidence that Al-Quida training in Iraq.

    3. There was post war information that terrorist training took place at Salman Pak, but due to second-hand information, it was difficult to tell wether the people being trained were Al-Quida or other foreign nationals, and, post war exploration yields no link to Al-Quida.

    That is very different from saying that there were no terrorist training camps in Iraq.
    In fact, that third quote indicates that there was terrorist training in Iraq, but no link to Al-Quida.

    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    CIA report to the committe:

    "There was information developed after OIF (Operation Iraqi Freedem) that indicated terrorists were trained at Salman Pak;
    I'm tired, I'm going to bed.

  9. #134
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    36,513
    Quote Originally Posted by AstroPax View Post
    Furthermore, one of the main tenants of fascism is "a belief that the group is the victim, justifying any action without legal or moral limits."

    Sure sounds like something OBL himself would say.


    -Astro
    Actually, that is something Bush actually IS saying, in regards to CIA camps and habeas corpus. For reals.

  10. #135
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by gonehuckin View Post
    i refered you to that editorial not because i wanted you to take everything he says a truth but more that i want you to read the definition of Fascism brought to us by those who saw it first hand.
    OK, the credit at the bottom of the article explains everything, but thanks anyway:

    "Thom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning best-selling author, and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk show carried on the Air America Radio network"

    -Astro

  11. #136
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Actually, that is something Bush actually IS saying, in regards to CIA camps and habeas corpus. For reals.
    Mere details. Next question.

  12. #137
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    36,513
    Many would argue that thousands upon thousands of terrorists were trained in the US, by the CIA, for all sorts of operations globally. (Contra's, sandonistas, Afghanis, Saudis, etc)
    Should we destroy our own country because of that inconvienent fact as well?

  13. #138
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Actually, that is something Bush actually IS saying, in regards to CIA camps and habeas corpus. For reals.
    We put a patrol dog in the face of a terrorist, while in the meantime, they cut off heads. Whatever.

    I'm sorry, but I think you are attacking the wrong entity.

    -Astro

  14. #139
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Many would argue that thousands upon thousands of terrorists were trained in the US, by the CIA, for all sorts of operations globally. (Contra's, sandonistas, Afghanis, Saudis, etc)
    Should we destroy our own country because of that inconvienent fact as well?
    That may be this adminstration's motivation, we're still trying to figure that part out.

  15. #140
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,935
    Quote the whole passage. Taking it that out of context you might as well just rearrange the letters to spell what you want it to say

    "There was information developed after OIF (Operation Iraqi Freedem) that indicated terrorists were trained at Salman Pak; there was an apparent surge of such reporting. As with past information, however, the reporting is vague and difficult to substantiate . As was the case with the prewar reporting, the postwar sources provided few details, and it is difficult to conclude from their second-hand accounts whether Iraq was training al-Qa'ida members, as opposed to other foreign nationals. Postwar exploitation of Salman Pak has yielded no indications that training of al-Qa'ida linked individuals took place there, and we have no information from detainees on this issue"

    At the moment my bitterness is largely driven by the constant drivel that you post here - god bothering, global warming denial, Bush boosting and war chants. When confronted with substantiated evidence you squirm like a five year old kid that needs to take a leak.

    As mentioned far earlier history will judge what is being done in Iraq very harshly. Hopefully people who clammered for it like you will recieve the disgust that they deserve from future generations.
    Last edited by PNWbrit; 09-25-2006 at 09:54 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  16. #141
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    36,513
    Quote Originally Posted by AstroPax View Post
    We put a patrol dog in the face of a (ALLEGED!!!)terrorist, while in the meantime, they cut off heads. Whatever.

    I'm sorry, but I think you are attacking the wrong entity.

    -Astro
    Oh, the tenents of justice don't apply here as well? You think intelligence is 100% correct, in every instance?
    If not, couldn't we simply assasinate Cheney beacause we "assume" he is evil?

  17. #142
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,093
    Quote Originally Posted by MeatPuppet View Post
    No, that is not what the quotes said. They said that:

    1. There was no evidence that there were non-Iraqis being trained at Salman Pak after 1991.

    2. There was no credible evidence that Al-Quida training in Iraq.

    3. There was post war information that terrorist training took place at Salman Pak, but due to second-hand information, it was difficult to tell wether the people being trained were Al-Quida or other foreign nationals, and, post war exploration yields no link to Al-Quida.
    Seems like after PNWBrit beat the stuffing out of the straw man you put up, you're left grasping at nothing but straws. As desperate as our current administration.

    "Lunch break over" = "Tired, going to bed" = PWN3D

  18. #143
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,774
    rideit-

    i might not say stuff like that on a public forum. with this administration, you could end up in an undisclosed location facing no charges, just imprisonment

    -aaron

  19. #144
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Actually, that is something Bush actually IS saying, in regards to CIA camps and habeas corpus. For reals.
    For reals?

    You know, don't you, that "President Lincoln appropriated powers no previous President had wielded. He used his war powers to proclaim a blockade, suspended the writ of habeas corpus, spent money without congressional authorization, and imprisoned 18,000 suspected Confederate sympathizers without trial. All his actions, although vehemently denounced by the Copperheads, were subsequently upheld by Congress and the Courts."

    So, do you think Lincoln was a Fascist?

    -Astro

  20. #145
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by MeatPuppet View Post
    But nobody ever won anything playing defense. You have to go on the offensive, if you wait until they attack you, there is a heavy price to pay.
    How did the US win the Cold War? Choose offense or defense.

    Was the communist threat successfully contained? Choose yes or no.

  21. #146
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    Oh, the tenents of justice don't apply here as well? You think intelligence is 100% correct, in every instance?
    If not, couldn't we simply assasinate Cheney beacause we "assume" he is evil?
    Look, ASSHOLE, if you are going to quote me, PLEASE don't modify the quote!

    Wait, strike the "please" part....re-phrase: DON'T MODIFY THE QUOTE, period!

    Are you really THAT desperate?

    -Astro
    Last edited by AstroPax; 09-25-2006 at 10:14 PM.

  22. #147
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Point of No Return
    Posts
    2,016
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWbrit View Post
    Quote the whole passage. Taking it that out of context you might as well just rearrange the letters to spell what you want it to say

    "There was information developed after OIF (Operation Iraqi Freedem) that indicated terrorists were trained at Salman Pak; there was an apparent surge of such reporting. As with past information, however, the reporting is vague and difficult to substantiate . As was the case with the prewar reporting, the postwar sources provided few details, and it is difficult to conclude from their second-hand accounts whether Iraq was training al-Qa'ida members, as opposed to other foreign nationals. Postwar exploitation of Salman Pak has yielded no indications that training of al-Qa'ida linked individuals took place there, and we have no information from detainees on this issue"

    At the moment my bitterness is largely driven by the constant drivel that you post here - god bothering, global warming denial, Bush boosting and war chants. When confronted with substantiated evidence you squirm like a five year old kid that needs to take a leak.

    As mentioned far earlier history will judge what is being done in Iraq very harshly. Hopefully people who clammered for it like you will recieve the disgust that they deserve from future generations.


    Just wanted to hang on to this one for you buddy.

  23. #148
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    KSLC
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by EZB View Post
    How did the US win the Cold War? Choose offense or defense.
    Offensive posturing.

    Quote Originally Posted by EZB View Post
    Was the communist threat successfully contained? Choose yes or no.
    Define "contained".

    -Astro

  24. #149
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Point of No Return
    Posts
    2,016
    Quote Originally Posted by EZB View Post
    How did the US win the Cold War? Choose offense or defense.

    Was the communist threat successfully contained? Choose yes or no.
    Offense means different things in different wars. As I recall we deployed the pershing II and were moving forward with SDI. Some would consider that an offensive move in the kind of war we were fighting. That being said, I would hardly equate the threat we face today with the Soviet Union.

  25. #150
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Point of No Return
    Posts
    2,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Tri-Ungulate View Post

    "Lunch break over" = "Tired, going to bed" = PWN3D

    Could be, or it could be that I actually have a life outside of the TGR forums.


    Peace.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •