Does anyone know if the new Axial II's are the same mounting pattern as the old Axials or Look Pivots? Would there be a conflict trying to mount Axial II's where a set of Axials was mounted for a similar boot sole length?
Am I correct assuming that Pivots and Axials had the same mounting pattern?
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Axial vs Axial II scew pattern
-
09-02-2006, 11:00 PM #1
Survivor
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- PacNW
- Posts
- 954
Axial vs Axial II scew pattern
"Don't tease me about my hobbies, I don't tease you about being an asshole"
-
09-02-2006, 11:07 PM #2
*NOT* an expert
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- 9,300ft
- Posts
- 23,145
I think the toe is the same and the heel is different but I'm not sure.
Originally Posted by blurred
-
09-03-2006, 12:00 AM #3
Day laborer
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Iron Range
- Posts
- 4,965
I think the heel is different, more like a Nova(Axium? Can't remember the mid-grade Rossi binding model) heelpiece.
-
09-03-2006, 12:32 AM #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- South Lake Tahoe
- Posts
- 257
The heel has the same mount pattern as the old FTX bindings, the heel track pretty much is an old FTX, and for those of you looking for wide brakes, the old FTX wide brakes work on the Axial2's as well.
-
09-03-2006, 09:13 AM #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 644
What ColinB said. The toe hole pattern is the same but the heel is different then axial/pivot.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks