Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: The truth behind the glaze...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11,326

    The truth behind the glaze...

    Amid the quest to create a low-fat, tasty doughnut, attempts to trick consumers with false labeling are exposed
    Advertisement


    By Shirley Leung
    The Wall Street Journal

    January 27, 2004

    NEW YORK -- Robert Ligon, a 68-year-old health-food executive, began serving 15 months in a federal prison earlier this month.

    His crime: willfully mislabeling doughnuts as low-fat.

    Exhibit A: The label on his company's "carob-coated" doughnut said it had 3 grams of fat and 135 calories. But an analysis by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration showed that the doughnut, glazed with chocolate, contained a sinfully indulgent 18 grams of fat and 530 calories.

    Ligon's three-year-long nationwide doughnut caper -- which involved selling mislabeled doughnuts, cinnamon rolls and cookies to diet centers -- began to crumble when customers complained to the FDA about how tasty his products were.

    "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is," said Jim Dahl, assistant director of the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigation. The skinny on low-fat doughnuts: "Science can do a lot of things, but we're not quite there yet."

    Flavor from fat

    The low-fat doughnut is the Holy Grail of the food industry. Food companies have been able to take most of the fat out of everything from cheese to Twinkies. But no one has succeeded in designing a marketable doughnut that dips below the federal low-fat threshold of three grams per serving.

    Doughnuts typically range from 8 grams of fat for a glazed French cruller to more than double that for a cake-like doughnut.

    Perhaps no other bakery good is so dependent on fat. After the batter is shaped into rings and dropped into hot oil, the deep-frying process preserves the shape, gives the doughnut a crust and pushes out moisture, allowing for the absorption of fat. The fat itself is responsible for most of its flavor.

    A doughnut contains as much as 25 percent fat; the bulk of that is the oil absorbed during frying, according to the American Institute of Baking, a research and teaching outfit based in Manhattan, Kan., that is financed by the baking industry.

    The low-fat doughnut, declared Len Heflich, an industry executive at the American Bakers Association, is "not possible."

    Science steps in

    That hasn't stopped almost everyone in the approximately $3 billion doughnut industry from trying.

    In the late 1980s, Dunkin' Donuts briefly offered a cholesterol-free doughnut that contained no eggs and no milk. It went nowhere. During the 1990s, Entenmann's Bakery offered a doughnut with 25 percent less fat, but poor sales forced the company to shelve it. Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. has explored low-fat or low-calorie options but has yet to roll one out.

    Some bakeries sell "baked doughnuts" that are low in fat, but doughnut-makers say that's cheating: If it's baked, it's a cake.

    Scientists also are trying to put the doughnut on a diet. U.S. Patent No. 6,001,399 claims that replacing sugar with polydextrose, a low-calorie synthetic sweetener commonly found in ice cream and frozen foods, can reduce the doughnut's absorption of frying fats by 25 percent to 30 percent.

    In addition, U.S. Patent No. 4,937,086 says that injecting polyvinylpyrrolidone, which normally keeps pills in packed form, into the doughnut batter reduces fat by 30 percent without a "pasty or greasy taste."

    In an article entitled "Development of Low Oil-Uptake Donuts" published in 2001 in the Journal of Food Science, scientists at the USDA's Agricultural Research Service wrote that adding rice flour to the traditional wheat-flour-base doughnut mix lowered fat by 64 percent.

    Fred Shih, a chemist who helped author the study, said the doughnut that resulted was tasty, but he doesn't expect to see it on grocer shelves anytime soon.

    "It worked in a lab," he said, but "it may not be so easily converted into commercial operation." (One kink: short shelf life.)

    Failing the taste test

    Despite its no-cholesterol-doughnut flop, Dunkin' Donuts, the nation's largest doughnut chain, continues to push ahead in the quest for a low-fat doughnut. The company's doughnut technologists have all but ruled out tinkering with its closely held, 26-ingredient batter, which contains little fat.

    The chain, a unit of London-based Allied Domecq PLC with outlets throughout the Baltimore region, has tried frying dough in a fat substitute but feared its digestive side effects would leave a bad taste.

    At its product laboratory in Braintree, Mass., one recent morning, researchers in white lab coats tasted and prodded their latest prototype: a chewier-than-average doughnut that is not fried, but made on a machine that resembles a waffle maker.

    The result weighs in at 150 calories, half the amount of its full-fat cousin, and fewer than 3 grams of fat. Still, this doughnut fails to meet Dunkin's standards of texture, taste and something called "mouth feel."

    "We would love to be able to offer a great-tasting doughnut that is low-fat," said Joe Scafido, chief menu and concept officer for Allied Domecq's quick-service restaurants, "but I'm not sure we're going to get there."

    Low-fat fraud grows

    The criminal files on doughnut-related fraud thickened in the 1990s after new federal laws required more-detailed labeling of food. The FDA's Office of Criminal Investigation said that about a quarter of its cases involved food, most related to tampering.

    About 20 percent of those food cases are related to the "misbranding" of food, such as false labels or misstated country of origin.

    Ligon, who began his sentence Jan. 6, was not the first doughnut derelict. In 2000, Vernon Patterson, president of Genesis II Foods Inc., an Illinois bakery, pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud for passing off three varieties of doughnuts as low-fat.

    According to federal court records, customers helped build the case against Patterson by raising questions about his suspiciously tasty low-fat treats. Patterson served one year and a day in a federal prison.

    The doughnut ring of Ligon, a former weight-loss-center franchisee, began in 1995, according to the FDA. That's when he started a weight-loss product company, Nutrisource Inc., to sell protein shakes, nutritional bars and baked goods to diet centers.

    According to Rudy Hejny, the FDA agent in charge of the investigation, Ligon bought full-fat doughnuts from Cloverhill Bakery, a Chicago company, and repackaged them as diet doughnuts. It was a lucrative operation: Ligon would buy doughnuts for 25 cents to 33 cents each and then resell the mislabeled versions for a dollar each.

    Customer complaints to the FDA started rolling in, questioning whether these were in fact low-fat doughnuts. So did one from a packaging company Ligon hired to label and distribute the doughnuts. Key evidence: One of its employees gained weight after eating Ligon's doughnuts.

    Doughnuts seized

    The FDA began an investigation in 1997, tracking down Ligon's customers and former business partners in a previous weight-loss-product company.

    Investigators learned that this wasn't Ligon's first brush with improperly labeled doughnuts. One of his former customers, the owner of a weight-loss center, had grown suspicious after briefly placing one of his doughnuts on a napkin to answer the phone.

    "She saw a grease ring," Hejny said. The customer had the doughnut independently tested and discovered it was not low-fat. No legal action was taken.

    In the summer of 1997, the FDA, armed with search warrants, raided Ligon's office and packaging facilities in Kentucky and Illinois, seizing 18,720 doughnuts, along with cinnamon rolls and labels. Ligon shut down the business, but the FDA pursued a criminal case.

    Abuse of trust

    In 2001, a U.S. District Court grand jury in Chicago indicted Ligon on mail fraud for his role in carrying out a scheme that involved shipping falsely labeled goods. In September, he pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud.

    At the time of sentencing, the government calculated he tried to sell several hundred thousand dollars' worth of mislabeled doughnuts and cinnamon rolls.

    "Mr. Ligon abused the trust people put on these labels," said Stuart Fullerton, the assistant U.S. attorney who prosecuted the case. "It's kind of cruel on his part to do this."

    Reached on his mobile telephone before beginning his sentence, Ligon said he did not intentionally break the law and never heard a single complaint about his doughnuts.

    "Everybody wanted the product and were very upset they couldn't get the product," he said. Asked if he felt the punishment fit the crime, he said: "I feel like I've been singled out."

    For all his troubles, Ligon said he doesn't even eat doughnuts. That works out fine. Most federal prisons, a spokeswoman said, don't serve doughnuts.
    Copyright © 2004, Chicago Tribune

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    The Cone of Uncertainty
    Posts
    49,304
    Well, my eyes certainly glazed over about halfway through that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jack Tone Road
    Posts
    12,735
    Anyone who would pay a dollar for a doughnut deserves to be ripped off.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,641

    Thumbs down

    Anyone eating "healthy" doughnuts deserves to be ripped off.
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    771
    Originally posted by CaddyDaddy77
    Anyone eating "healthy" doughnuts deserves to be ripped off.
    agreed...healthy doughnuts is a bit of an oxymoron. If I want to eat healthy, it's going to be carrots, not Krispy Kreme.
    I went out there in search of experience. To taste, and to touch, and to feel as much as a man can, before he repents.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,641

    Thumbs down

    Was in Phoenix last week and driving past a Krispy Kreme, it amazed me the number of people waiting in the drive-through for doughnuts. Do people eat these things like lunch?

    I can't eat more than one or two of the things, eeecchh. No wonder so many people are obese, too far to get out of your car and walk 12 feet to get a fat-filled doughnut?
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    A healthy doughnut seems about as likely as a healthy cigarette!

    The thing that's really starting to bug me is all the low-carb, Atkins stuff popping up everywhere. The last time I was at the grocery store I saw all kinds of stuff labeled as low carb. I'm still seeing just as many lard asses around, though!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Slut Lake City
    Posts
    7,785

    Unhappy

    It's fuckers like this that have kept me fat all my life.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11,326
    I knew you'd understand chubby.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    spitting distance from Mavericks
    Posts
    2,725
    (begin Tuesday morning, caffeine injected rant) this is whacked. This guy gets jail time and there are gobs of companies out there that pollute the air with crap, poison the water with toxic chemicals, add pesticides to our food, blah blah blah - and this guy goes to jail for mislabeling donuts? whoa.
    (end rant, back to caffeine).
    “Within this furnace of fear, my passion for life burns fiercely. I have consumed all evil. I have overcome my doubt. I am the fire.”

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    2,121
    Originally posted by CaddyDaddy77
    Anyone eating "healthy" doughnuts deserves to be ripped off.
    Werd... I think 15 months in a Federal 'pound me in the ass' prison is a little severe though. They got him for mail fraud. I guess if the gov't really wants you, they'll get you. Kinda like they get a lot of dealers for tax evasion...

    Ted

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Logan, Utah.
    Posts
    2,053
    "So, uh, what're you in for?"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,641
    Originally posted by Twoplanker
    "So, uh, what're you in for?"
    "Lying to chubbies"
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Olathe, KS
    Posts
    2,121
    Originally posted by Twoplanker
    "So, uh, what're you in for?"
    Screwing people with doughnuts. I know.... I'm weird.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    Originally posted by watersnowdirt
    (begin Tuesday morning, caffeine injected rant)
    In light of other recent threads, I don't think you want to admit to any caffeine injections.

    http://tetongravity.com/forums/showt...t=coffee+enema

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Sea-gary
    Posts
    181
    Wasn't this a Seinfeld episode?
    D'oh!!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    13,606
    Originally posted by Theodore
    Screwing people with doughnuts. I know.... I'm weird.
    My...aren't we falling...so now it's dougnut enemas?
    Your dog just ate an avocado!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    spitting distance from Mavericks
    Posts
    2,725
    Originally posted by The AD
    In light of other recent threads, I don't think you want to admit to any caffeine injections.

    http://tetongravity.com/forums/showt...t=coffee+enema
    hehe, this is what happens when you don't hang out here enough - missed that entirely! whoops. well, as always, glad I can entertain.
    “Within this furnace of fear, my passion for life burns fiercely. I have consumed all evil. I have overcome my doubt. I am the fire.”

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    Originally posted by Viva
    My...aren't we falling...so now it's dougnut enemas?
    No, the doughnuts are used as hemmroid (spelling??) cushions and also to pad the insertion of the espresso nozzle

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    portland of the west
    Posts
    4,083
    Originally posted by Chronic
    Wasn't this a Seinfeld episode?
    yeah, but the frozen yogurt people didn't get sent to jail.

    sidenote: i saw seinfeld at breakfast the other day.
    fine

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Gare du Lyon
    Posts
    4,896
    [Flagrantly Beating Dead Horse]


    Originally posted by seldon
    No, the doughnuts are used as hemmroid (spelling??) cushions and also to pad the insertion of the espresso nozzle
    [/Flagrantly Beating Dead Horse]

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    Originally posted by tuffy109
    yeah, but the frozen yogurt people didn't get sent to jail.

    sidenote: i saw seinfeld at breakfast the other day.
    You mean you actually saw Jerry Seinfeld?

    You should have walked up and asked him "hey, shouldn't you be eating at Monk's Cafe?" I'm sure he's never heard that one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •