The easy access is likely to increase the tendency to go for it when if you had to hike for it you may be less likely to jump in.
I find it helpful for decision making to think about backcountry descents in terms of several important factors and apply a Green-yellow-Red in to each factor:
1) Group - experience, egos, size of group/# rescuers etc
2) Snowpack - stability and quality
3) Terrain - exposure, terrain traps, coverage, etc.
4) Other (weather, rescue difficulty, time of day, etc)
When you rate each factor and look at the picture overall I find it often helps clarify the real relative level of risk. One or even two reds/yellows doesnt mean no-go, it just means you better be aware of the increased risk.
For example in the situation in question LL I'd rate the situation as follows (of course I wasnt there so its only my guess)
1) Group - yellow/red - MBSC didnt know these people and therefore didnt know their experience level. Were they going to ski above her and kick a slide? Did they know how to rescue? Were they competent skiers on this typ of slope? Was their decision making good?
2) Snowpack - Red - 3 feet of new snow - unless it was exceptionally stable I'd call it higher on the danger scale simply b/c of the volume of new snow. Most avalanches happen in the first 24-48 hours after snowfall.
3) Terrain - Red - deathfall likely here - either from fall or avalanche. Right at the ski area, but high on the exposure factor.
4) Other - Green - dont see any other factors.
Three reds - that probably means no-go for me, but then again its everyone's own decision based on comfort with risk.
Bookmarks