Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41

Thread: Why do you need a stiff boot for riding?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Christchurch, NZ
    Posts
    410

    Question Why do you need a stiff boot for riding?

    I mean, why? I believe that the only place where it is useful is groomers and ice. I've got a Lange Comp 120 and they are perfect while i'm ripping hard snow, but hell, they can't absorb any little bumps, they transfer shock right to your shins! And they require very accurate landing on the whole ski (or in deep pow), because when you're landing on your tails you got your shins banged (especially if your skis got a stiff tails). And in the pow your slightest front/rear movements are transferred to your skis instantly and if you go slow and your ski toes are short (like my 186 mojos) - you will sink.

    What do you think?
    oh shit here comes the ground!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Les Pays Flat
    Posts
    622
    Totally misread the title..

    That is all.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sunriver, Orygun
    Posts
    529

    Red face

    Cuz chicks dig'em, isn't that enuff?

    If not you may not need a stiff boot for 186's. Though the reason stiff is nice is big skis @ speed = more control. Skis, especially big, phat and stiff, can easily overpower your boots. You make a movement and the ski just wants to do its own thing. I've recently run into this problem w/ my big daddy's. So stiffer boots in the near future, for me. Though for riding the park/pipe or touring, soft flexing boots work fine. I use my alpine boots in my AT setup just for better power tranfer. Same reason lotsa big stiff tele boots are out there. Bigger skis overpowering the boot.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    I have the opposite probelm than duboix. i have POS old lange banshee 7s and both my scratch bcs and my XXs overpower them. it was REALLY bad when i got on a pair of exploders in crud....

    frikin soft, too big boots.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,641
    I think it's different factors, including;

    Height / weight
    Aggresiveness
    Terrain
    Purpose (chasing gates vs. BC, etc..)

    I will always ski a fairly stiff boot, I like the response of a stiff boot versus a softer one. If your big enough you can flex out a boot, basically feel the boot pooch out, or fold under you.
    I think it's a balance between too stiff and too soft, I definitely like a softer boot for park, etc, and a stiffer one for chasing sticks, for the same reason I don't freeski in a race boot.
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,139
    Just make sure you can actually flex your boot... leaning forward and shoving out your ass is NOT flexing.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,641
    Originally posted by SummitCo 1776
    Just make sure you can actually flex your boot... leaning forward and shoving out your ass is NOT flexing.
    No, your right that is Schussing in Europe or the Texan tuck in the U.S.
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,490
    I'm kinda thinking the same thing. Since I moved to Flexons I've realised that a softer flex is better for the skiing that I like to do the most (everything not ice/hardpack...or bumbs, but they're better for that too.) However only too a point. I did add boosters to mine and still would ike to try a stiffer tongue. I'm not totally sold either way, but I'm convinced that softer can be better.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    very very small mountains
    Posts
    668
    I've realized the same...

    After changing from racing boots to freeride boots I felt much more comfortable in powder, crud or anywhere outside the groomers.

    I love my current Lange Banshees. Just a right combination of flex and stiffness, and they're light as hell, with special raichle/kneissl type of inner boot (which is also great for avoiding shin bang!)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In the rain
    Posts
    1,621
    More control..more safety....For most stuff I ride Richlee F1 Pro's ....they are rather stiff, for Touring I have Lowa Struka Evo's....Yes I can ski almost everything (skis and conditions) with my Lowa's but I have tto be slower and more precise in what I do...I can't just go charging around....difficult snow pushes skis around, the added flexabilityof the lowa's gives the ski a chance to turn befor me feet and legs get to counteract this hence a less stable but more comfortable ride...but not neccesarily less exahusting...I can just lean on my stiff boots to make the skis turn, I don't have to push them around.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    yurp
    Posts
    2,376
    I am hoping to get my greasy mitts on some of the new Garmont Adrenalines this week. They could be interesting - the guy I spoke to (a former Salomon WC boot tech) thought they were as stiff as top-of-the line Sallys. Could be interesting having an AT boot that is stiffer than most alpine ones...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hunter Thompson described it as hell.
    Posts
    2,641
    Originally posted by Mulletizer
    I am hoping to get my greasy mitts on some of the new Garmont Adrenalines this week. They could be interesting - the guy I spoke to (a former Salomon WC boot tech) thought they were as stiff as top-of-the line Sallys. Could be interesting having an AT boot that is stiffer than most alpine ones...
    Really curious to see what you think, this could be the boot, that gets me out of Alpines.
    Skiing, where my mind is even if my body isn't.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hanging out with Yodie and Grison
    Posts
    1,000
    Hey Mulletizer, what's the scoop on the Adrenalines? Are they going to be in stores soon? There's no mention of them on the Garmont website, so I took that as a "it's going to be awhile". Like most gear sluts I've been drooling over those things (hope they fit my foot).

    Yeah, I'm with CaddyDaddy. These could be the perfect all around boot.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Crystal Mountain, Washington
    Posts
    582

    Talking Different Boot Flexes

    The problem I found when getting new boots is that in the 70* shop the plastic in the boot is softer so it feels like a soft flexing boot. Until you get in the cold on the slopes then the whole picture changes. I found the best method is to have a soft flex boot and a stiff flex boot. Kinda of like having a two ski quiver for different conditions. So , in cold weather I break out the soft flex boot and in the warmer weather the stiff flex boot. Just for the record they are Soft--Rossignol Freeride XX. Stiff--Rossignol Course Kevlar KX. Just my two cents worth

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Leper Colony
    Posts
    3,460
    Originally posted by Mountain Junkie
    Hey Mulletizer, what's the scoop on the Adrenalines? Are they going to be in stores soon? There's no mention of them on the Garmont website, so I took that as a "it's going to be awhile". Like most gear sluts I've been drooling over those things (hope they fit my foot).

    Yeah, I'm with CaddyDaddy. These could be the perfect all around boot.

    I talked with a shop guy at Wilson Backcountry who will be carrying the boots and he said it is a Fall '04 release.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    6,110
    The better your boot fits, the softer it can flex. You want leg motion to be translated to ski motion as efficiently as possible, but you want as soft a flex as possible so crud and landings don't beat your shins up.

    This is why I can get away with Daleboots, which are fairly soft: they fit perfectly, since full bootfitting and heat-molded liners are part of the deal.

    I wouldn't recommend them to anyone who weighs more than I do and skis fast, though <cough>Endless</cough>. I've got the shell riveted together, so all the flex is from the plastic instead of from the hinge and the spring, and they're just barely stiff enough.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    my head up my ass
    Posts
    525
    Been riding a new pair of Garmont G Rides this year. Pretty good in everything but high speed fast snow (can't get enough tip pressure to quiet the ski tip).
    Prefer my old Technica Explosion 10's for most skiing, however. Even in pow and especially in crud it is nice to have a stiffer more secure fit.
    Will be selling my G Rides next Fall and buying the Adrenaline. It may be the one boot solution I dream of.
    Wonder why Garmont does not offer stiffer tongues for its boots. You could easily pop in a super stiff tongue for in bounds and a softy for BC skinning.
    The forward lock lever and the Vibram soles are so sweet for walking around or scrambling over rocks, scree and ice.
    I don't think the walk lever softens the boot as much as the soft plastics do. I think they can and will make a pretty darn stiff boot that still lets you stand like a normal human being with your ankle at 90 degrees (a real pleasure for those tram rides).

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,710
    Any current (2008) thoughts on stiff boots?

    Last night, I bought a pair of Nordica SpeedMachine 14s* to replace my old Nordica Grand Prix. The Grand Prix fit well and I never had any problems with them except for some shin bang (particularly after days where I'd ski fast through crud). The SpeedMachines fit like the Grand Prix and seem to about as stiff. The fit is very good. My only concern is the boots' stiffness.

    Would I be better off with softer boots, say, the SpeedMachine 12s? I'm 6'1", 185 lbs., 31 years old, usually ski Prophet 100s or Praxis (though I may get something along the lines of the XXLs next year), like to ski fairly fast and huck a little, make occassional laps the park, don't race, hope to get into the backcountry 6-8x a year, and don't really care about groomer performance. I'm pretty sure that the SpeedMachine 14s will be at least a decent boot, as they fit and flex like my old Grand Prix. But I haven't owned a softer boot since I was in high school (Flexons -> TNTs -> Grand Prix -> Now) and am wondering if I might avoid my shin bang problems with a softer boot.

    *REI is selling them for $500 right now, which is about $200 cheaper than a lot of places. I assume that I can return my SpeedMachines for cash or a different boot, if necessary.
    Last edited by AKbruin; 02-07-2008 at 10:12 AM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    224
    Quote Originally Posted by duboix View Post
    and if you go slow and your ski toes are short (like my 186 mojos) - you will sink.


    Ski toes? I'm so confused right now.

    *edit* And holy crap, way to bump the oldest thread ever.
    Forced days in bed this winter: 48
    Forced days on crutches/walker: 37
    I'M WALKING AGAIN!!!
    Days on snow: Are you kidding?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    yurp
    Posts
    2,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Mulletizer View Post
    I am hoping to get my greasy mitts on some of the new Garmont Adrenalines this week. They could be interesting - the guy I spoke to (a former Salomon WC boot tech) thought they were as stiff as top-of-the line Sallys. Could be interesting having an AT boot that is stiffer than most alpine ones...
    Fuck, how wrong was he?! I guess they were better than what we had before though...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,710
    Quote Originally Posted by koolaideprived View Post
    Ski toes? I'm so confused right now.

    *edit* And holy crap, way to bump the oldest thread ever.
    I didn't want to be yelled at by the search-function screamers. (They scare me.)

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    la la land
    Posts
    5,816
    Quote Originally Posted by Mulletizer View Post
    I am hoping to get my greasy mitts on some of the new Garmont Adrenalines this week. They could be interesting - the guy I spoke to (a former Salomon WC boot tech) thought they were as stiff as top-of-the line Sallys. Could be interesting having an AT boot that is stiffer than most alpine ones...
    Quote Originally Posted by CaddyDaddy77 View Post
    Really curious to see what you think, this could be the boot, that gets me out of Alpines.

    Don't know your sizes, but you could get these for cheapish. Make an offer:

    http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...d.php?t=111127
    `•.¸¸.•´><((((º>`•.¸¸.•´¯`•.¸.? ??´¯`•...¸><((((º>

    "Having been Baptized by uller his frosty air now burns my soul with confirmation. I am once again pure." - frozenwater

    "once i let go of my material desires many opportunities for playing with the planet emerge. emerge - to come into being through evolution. ok back to work - i gotta pack." - Slaag Master

    "As for Flock of Seagulls, everytime that song comes up on my ipod, I turn it up- way up." - goldenboy

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    Any current (2008) thoughts on stiff boots?

    Last night...
    I think thoughts are now as they were the. The exact reasons the original poster said was the bad things with stiff boots are form other people (like me*) the good things.

    Quote Originally Posted by duboix View Post
    I've got a Lange Comp 120 and they are perfect while i'm ripping hard snow, but hell, they can't absorb any little bumps, they transfer shock right to your shins!
    I don' mind some small hits. But if you whack into something big time, a soft boot is gonna fold and a stiff one will take up the energy in a better way.

    Quote Originally Posted by duboix View Post
    And they require very accurate landing on the whole ski (or in deep pow), because when you're landing on your tails you got your shins banged (especially if your skis got a stiff tails).
    I see this as more of a problem with a bad fitting cuff (or a too stiff boot that was tried to made softer by not clamping it tight).

    Quote Originally Posted by duboix View Post
    And in the pow your slightest front/rear movements are transferred to your skis instantly and if you go slow and your ski toes are short (like my 186 mojos) - you will sink.
    Thats more a result of a bad ski design, in my opinion. When you're on the right ski, you can instead take advantage of the precision.
    Quote Originally Posted by duboix View Post
    What do you think?
    Well, I think stiff boots are good.

    Actually, when I first started skiing a "fatter" ski, the Explosve was my first ad if was fat back then, I also though I got a too direct contact with the snow. This made me loosed up cuffs a bit (but keep the power strap tight). But since then, I got used to the ski and now I like it hard again.

    Anyway, its all very, very personal. The remarks above only reflect my personal views on it. A similar sized guy skiing the same runs on the same skis in a similar style might like super soft boots.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by AKbruin View Post
    to replace my old Nordica Grand Prix. The Grand Prix fit well and I never had any problems with them ...

    I assume that I can return my SpeedMachines for cash or a different boot, if necessary.
    If you happen to be a 25.5, I've got brand new Grand Prix for sale...PM me.
    "I've barfed better graphics than some of those."
    Conundrum

    FS :
    -Nordica GP boots
    http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...d.php?t=111667

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Neon View Post
    If you happen to be a 25.5, I've got brand new Grand Prix for sale...PM me.
    That's an excellent deal, but I'm a 28.5.

    HitMe- I appreciate the opinion.

    Others- Just so you know, I bumped a relevant but dated (2004) thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •