
Originally Posted by
burny
one thing i belive is really funny: when Lance was accused of doping in 99 because of some unnatural testing his "excuse" was:"i used some butt cream that must have contained the hormones"
Actually, this is probably true. The hydrocortisone cream that I buy at Rite-Aid for saddle sore relief would probably cause me to fail a doping test. As would other products available over the counter.
One of my primary reasons for believeng in Landis' "innocence" is that I just do not see him taking a shot of testosterone prior to stage 17. Where is the logic in that? If it worked, they knew that they were going to be tested anyway. It just does not seem rational. Keep in mind Landis was tested at Paris-Nice, and was probably tested at California and Georgia. We know the reullts of those tests were clean.
When the most recent scandal developed regarding the leaked EPO test results, I questioned the ethics of the testors, as well as the athletes. This is another case of bad ethics. Test resultls ahould not be leaked. The false positives CAN happen. That is the reason for the B-samples. It is generally accepted amongst the scientific community that the odds of two false positives from the same sample are so low that they are virtually impossible. The lab that has leaked this data has lost credibility. WADA needs an independent audit, as well.
"There is a hell of a huge difference between skiing as a sport- or even as a lifestyle- and skiing as an industry"
Hunter S. Thompson, 1970 (RIP)
Bookmarks