Poaching Wilderness- Ever done it??

[ANON-505]

First off: I've never poached wilderness on a mountain bike, nor have I ever violated the Wilderness Act in any way.

Whenever I hike in the Pecos Wilderness in Northern NM, I can't help but fantasize an early morning thru ride of the Sangres from west to east. I don't think I'd ever have the cojones to actually do it, but it had me thinking, does anyone ever do it? What is the fine? Today at work we were talking about doing it on a moonless night with night-vision goggles. and psychedlics.

What's your experience? Anyone ever fallen to temptation, and ridden the Federal Wilderness?

[gravitylover]

I've ridden trails(many years ago) that weave in and out from NF to Wilderness but were there long before the area was designated as such. I figured being 30 miles out from any real town and the fact that the trail was at least 90 years old it was fine and certainly never felt any guilt.

[kidwoo]

Almost weekly.

We've got three wilderness areas very close to one another and I seem to be literally the only one using some of these trails.

Considering the AT bindings I use are arguably as mechanized as my bike, the provision added AFTER the original draft to specifically prohibit bikes can suck it. So can the armchair whiners in marin county who lobbied for it.

I'm as anti development as anyone but allowing horses at the exclusion of bikes is absurd. Non-motorized yup. Non-mechanized? Get real.

I say go for it at every opportunity.

[Rontele]

While we should always try to avoid poaching wilderness because it only hurts the cause of mountain bikers, I do agree with kidwoo that allowing horses at the expense of bikes is absurd.

[pechelman]

speaking about horses
why the fuck dont people put on those poop bags that they use in the city when theyre riding on trails.
seems like it would be pretty nice
kinda like people picking up the poop from their dog.

[ANON-505]

kidwoo-

any run-ins with rangers? angry backpackers?

[kidwoo]

kidwoo-

any run-ins with rangers? angry backpackers?

Actually every single backpacker I've ever run into (like four), we both stopped and chatted in a very civil manner. We/They are out doing the same thing essentially. I don't try to run over them or anything especially since I'm the one breaking the law.

Only ran into a ranger once. But I was on the PCT crossing a road where she had stopped on her quad. But that wasn't wilderness. I just smiled and kept pedalling. There's no way she would have been able to follow me so who knows what her reaction would have been.

The two loops I dig the most literally see zero traffic, horse, foot or whatever except for within a few miles of exits. So run ins are few and far between. The total lack of maintenance and downed trees make it pretty obvious......even though they remain mapped on USFS literature.

Do some research on the wilderness act and the amendment almost two decades later that came to specifically mention mountain bikes. The whining of a small minority in a very centralized location has produced some pretty asinine, nationwide policy that has very little to do with the original intent of the bill.

[Telenater]

Do some research on the wilderness act and the amendment almost two decades later that came to specifically mention mountain bikes. The whining of a small minority in a very centralized location has produced some pretty asinine, nationwide policy that has very little to do with the original intent of the bill.

Irregardless of what you percieve to be the original intent of the Wilderness Act, violating areas closed to mountain bikers harms all mountain biker's chances of getting new areas open or new legal trails.

It probably also doesn't do anything to convince local authorities to pay attention to the desires of mountain bikers when they tackle issues (trail erosion) that they are mandated to fix.

[grskier]

Sticky subject. While I understand what kidwoo is doing, I'd have to agree with telenater.....

While I won't condone the action, I won't spit fire either. It seems like in a lot of areas, it's not an if but when senario, however in KW defense, it does seem like and if.

[kidwoo]

Irregardless of what you percieve to be the original intent of the Wilderness Act, violating areas closed to mountain bikers harms all mountain biker's chances of getting new areas open or new legal trails. .

It probably also doesn't do anything to convince local authorities to pay attention to the desires of mountain bikers when they tackle issues (trail erosion) that they are mandated to fix.

Despite what you may think from my few posts in this thread, I work very hard at building both legal and illegal trails around here in the hope of legitimization. Why the illegal part? Because at least three trails that I know of have been adopted since I've lived here and become part of the USFS and Tahoe basin management maintained network.

Please come with me sometime. You tell me whether or not what I'm doing out in BFE has any bearing on erosion (I'm a hyrdologist btw), or trail access. I know how to use my front brake and I wasn't kidding about the traffic on these trails.......there's no one out there.

Check this place out. Not a trail but still relevant.









Built entirely illegally on BLM land starting about 4 years ago. Last year the area was taken over as open space municipal park land and we were GIVEN the legal right to begin using heavy equipment there provided we maintain the place and keep some kiddie lines open. There's a list of 4 names (mine is one of them) who may and are expected now to maintain the place. Going by the book would have produced nothing.

Look up "missing link" on recent tahoe trail maps. I know it exists on at least one publication now. It was built by two hardworking people with a clue who did it right and now it's maintained by the powers that be.


These two examples are FAR more intrusive than riding a trail that's already in existence but was recently closed off to bikes because someone decided they could get more peaceful hiking and horseriding in if they could attach "mechanized" to bicycles.

Think about the mckinney rubicon jeep trail. Right by the reservoirs and right by many of the drainages that these designations in theory are supposed to preserve. Not to mention the fact that many of the "trails" in these wilderness areas are old logging road grades.

My bicycle is harming nothing. And I'm not about to wait until I'm 204 years old to watch something change legally. Selfish? Sure. But of all the illegal and harmful things going on in this world right now, me riding my bike on a cleared strip of dirt isn't one of them.

Try all you want to guilt me into feeling like I'm somehow jeapordizing the future of mountainbiking but trust me...........this is not a fresh topic with me.

At least take solace in the fact that I'm not so stupid as to go trucking down the pct over 4th of july weekend. Even I have limits. I don't want my sport chastized any more than you. But I'm also not going to let a bunch of armchair evironmentalists who live in urban areas dictate something they know nothing about just because they and thier horses are worth more than I'll ever be. Check out the wild heritage act and all the wilderness expansion bs that's being kicked around. I've signed every petition and all the stock letters to Barbara Boxer as well as one of my own trying to fight this crap. It's not erosion, watershed protection, or wildlife habitat that keeps bikes out of wilderness areas. It's something much more pathetic.

Seriously man.......come with me sometime. I don't go in high traffic areas at all.

[f2f]

ANON-505,

a very interesting position that hits close to home can be found here:

http://www.surgent.net/highpoints/nm/sandoval.html

the guy poached Redondo Peak at Sandoval County. the write-up and his justification for doing it are thoughtful.

[flowtron]

....kicking knowledge....

Werd.
And to answer the oringinal question....."maybe."

[marshalolson]

the first rule of mountain biking is that you do not talk about wilderness rides

[homerjay]

the first rule of mountain biking is that you do not talk about wilderness rides

This is the correct answer.

[kidwoo]

the first rule of mountain biking is that you do not talk about wilderness rides

I want people to know how absurd it is. Bragging at your local equestrian, or sierra club gathering isn't exactly the brightest thing to do but within an audience of bikers, it's worth discussion. Especially in california where about a bizillion more miles of trails are about to be shut down to bikes.

Luckily there's kind of a self governing aspect to most wilderness areas. Most of them don't sit adjacent to a highway where any joe average with a pair of tight shorts and a shiny new bike can just hop on in. Even if it were legal, traffic would be pretty low. You kind of have to be in shape and have a clue what you're doing. So even discussing it within our own little niche isn't exactly going to cause an onslaught

[Crinkle]

i think there is a difference of users between where kidwoo rides and what we endure here in CO. If the population of riders is so small and there is a chance of getting the trails legitimate, that's great and huge props for making it a better place to ride. There are soooo many riders out here in CO front range, that if more people were to take trail building upon themselves, we would probably see some absurd things done. Granted Wilderness areas are far from most trailheads for bikers here and the damage done to high altitude eco-systems is more long term (possibly than the sierras and more lush, lower altitude areas?) Finally, bikers are getting some representation at meetings in Jeffco and other areas regarding decision making process to limit trails to equestrian or hiker only. (for a long time there was a board of people and most decisions were made without any mtn biker input whatsoever) I think it would be awesome if we could get some supervised trail building in Jeffco/boulder areas (working with someone who has the experience), but it seems that there are too many meetings and the authorities take themselves pretty seriously here.

[BLOOD SWEAT STEEL]

Once.

ONCE.

I got snagged by the forest cops ten years ago and had my skewers confiscated. Humping your shit out eight miles on your back in ninety degree summer heat is not an experience I'd like to repeat.

Although I can't say I haven't been tempted at times.

[Viva]

As long as cattle are allowed to free-graze in "wilderness" areas, I have no problem with bikes so long as the riders aren't jerks.

Ride on.

[BLOOD SWEAT STEEL]

As long as cattle are allowed to free-graze in "wilderness" areas, I have no problem with bikes so long as the riders aren't jerks.

Ride on.

Yeah - but the ranchers pay for the privilege to damage delicate wilderness areas, so that makes it okay.

[homerjay]

I had a meeting last week with the USFS and the Colorado DOW for a trail project, and learned something pretty interesting. I guess the DOW monitors heartrates of winter range animals (deer, elk, etc.). During the winter, they are on a complete starvation diet, and slight increases in heartrate attributable to interaction with people can literally kill them buy burning too many calories.

Mind you, this is focused on winter recreation, but snowmobiliing was the least stressing to the deer, showshoeing was the most stressing. I guess being able to hear a sled for miles cuts down on the 'surprise' factor and keeps the heartrate low. Hikers/skiers/snowshoers stress them considerably more than sleds.

Kind of counterintuitive, but I'm sure this can be applied to motocross, mtn. biking, hiking, and equestrian. So mountain biking probably has less effect on animals than hiking or equestrian, since they are slightly more noisy and move faster. Slower, quieter forms of travel cause more stress.

[kidwoo]

Kind of counterintuitive, but I'm sure this can be applied to motocross, mtn. biking, hiking, and equestrian. So mountain biking probably has less effect on animals than hiking or equestrian, since they are slightly more noisy and move faster. Slower, quieter forms of travel cause more stress.

What if use snow tires to get back there in winter, ride with a wolf suit on and carry an air horn?


booyah!!! Venison y'all

[Arty50]

So mountain biking probably has less effect on animals than hiking or equestrian, since they are slightly more noisy and move faster. Slower, quieter forms of travel cause more stress.

I knew my King was good for the environment. Bzzzzzzzz

[Telenater]

Please come with me sometime. You tell me whether or not what I'm doing out in BFE has any bearing on erosion (I'm a hyrdologist btw), or trail access. I know how to use my front brake and I wasn't kidding about the traffic on these trails.......there's no one out there.

I'd love to meet up with you sometime (sometime after I get a replacement suspension bracket that I appear to have broken on the Rubicon trail last sunday).

I have no doubt that a single rider on a trail in a wilderness area will have a negligible impact when they ride properly. That's not the issue. I believe that the negative will created by hikers seeing mountain bike tracks where they shouldn't be will reduce the willingness of land managers to work with the mountain biking community as a whole for access and trail creation/maintenance.

[Pedro]

Once.

ONCE.

I got snagged by the forest cops ten years ago and had my skewers confiscated. Humping your shit out eight miles on your back in ninety degree summer heat is not an experience I'd like to repeat.

Although I can't say I haven't been tempted at times.

Hope you learned your lesson- When poaching always bring a set of extra skewers.

[Cono Este]

speaking about horses
why the fuck dont people put on those poop bags that they use in the city when theyre riding on trails.
seems like it would be pretty nice
kinda like people picking up the poop from their dog.

I cant ride my bike on the trail, i cant let my dog of the leash, but all the rich people can let their horse dump all over the trail!!