Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: TR Still going at Alta 6.10.06

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    This Is The Place
    Posts
    426

    TR Still going at Alta 6.10.06

    Went up Collins Gulch with Tele Mark:



    Coverage is still good, the snow starts at the Wildcat Chair.

    It was a beautiful day for a walk in the mountains:



    American Fork Twins, the top of the Snowbird tram &
    Snowbird's tunnel from Peruvian Gulch to Mineral Basin:



    The skiing was good in the Main Chute:





    Then we went up to Patrol Headquarters & hung out with the locals:



    We got the Main Chute, Backside/Yellow Trail to the aprons below Alf's
    then back up to Germ Pass & finished on Race Course back to the car:



    Good snow on the north facing, but south facing Cardiff, Toledo &
    Flagstaff are done for the season. It was a good one:



    Great day in the snow. Remember spring is a verb.
    Last edited by Shredgar; 06-10-2006 at 10:53 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    This Is The Place
    Posts
    426
    Mark's 4lbs/pair snake tongued Trab corn devils:



    Dropping into the Main Chute:







    That was fun:



    Grin to win:









    That's day 130. I might be done for this ski season, we'll see.
    Last edited by Shredgar; 06-10-2006 at 11:19 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Las Vegass
    Posts
    1,966
    nice, thats what i wanted to do yesterday morning but my complete out of shape jong ass could only make it to collins mid load. i then puked all over the slope ,so if you see a nice bright orange spot above rock gulley don't ski through it

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    181
    Had a fun day, however between suncups and runnels it's time to switch over to "turns-all-year" mode and keep the streak alive (34 months and counting). High Rustler is still in reasonably good shape for mid-june


    Missed the orange "marker" on the way out, must've been a good Friday night out.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Did you say 4 pounds PER PAIR???????????????

    Now *that* is the ultimate lightweight (non-deep) touring machine!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    This Is The Place
    Posts
    426
    4lbs/pair is what Mark tells me. That's the fatter version of Trab's 3.4lbs/pair rando race skis.

    Quote Originally Posted by powderwhore
    It's all about Hellgate for me these days pulling on rock that may or may not rip! Nice work. I only hike for pow.
    I hear you & good luck.

    Between biking, hiking, running & skiing I'd rather ski - as long as the hike to ski ratio is good.

    Will be out of town for a couple weeks. We'll see what's left when I get back.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by upallnight
    Did you say 4 pounds PER PAIR???????????????

    Now *that* is the ultimate lightweight (non-deep) touring machine!!!
    Yes, a true 4 lbs. Not exactly super floaty at 105/102-73-89, but more than enough especially with the oversized Duo tip.

    The Duo Sint Aeros in approx. 2 ft. of Utah's finest this past January.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by tele mark
    Yes, a true 4 lbs. Not exactly super floaty at 105/102-73-89, but more than enough especially with the oversized Duo tip.
    Pretty awesome for a rando-race ski that you could still have some fun on.

    I think my Dynafit D712s are similar dimensions but betww 5.5 & 6 pounds (never weighed them).

    I almost never use them, though, so it's hard to justify anything lighter.

    @ 4 pounds you must absolutely fly uphill!!

    Probably not of terrible interest to the alpine boot/trekker/metal binding crowd, I'm guessing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by upallnight
    Pretty awesome for a rando-race ski that you could still have some fun on.

    I think my Dynafit D712s are similar dimensions but betww 5.5 & 6 pounds (never weighed them).

    I almost never use them, though, so it's hard to justify anything lighter.

    @ 4 pounds you must absolutely fly uphill!!

    Probably not of terrible interest to the alpine boot/trekker/metal binding crowd, I'm guessing.
    Don't confuse light wieght and performance, you just need the right ski.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,516
    Shredgar - I think I saw your telerippin' daughter at Red Butte last night. I didn't want to ask her for change, for fear of creeping her out, but I think she would've known what I meant.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wilson, Wyo.
    Posts
    4,837
    Quote Originally Posted by tele mark
    Don't confuse light wieght and performance, you just need the right ski.
    Not confusing the 2 at all...but for *some* of the skiing I do, a ski of those dimensions of ANY weight wouldn't cut it. (Yes, I'm sure I could ski anything with them, but they wouldn't be as much fun.)

    That said, for *some* of the touring I do, I would LOVE to try out that ski!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •