Check Out Our Shop
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 153

Thread: Bigger Bro Model

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,574
    Apparently no one gives a shit what you think, max!

    edg
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

  2. #102
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    266
    what everybody else said, but I think a more consistant flex through the mid-way point between the tip and the toe piece for stability in chopped is most important. Meaning from the tail to the half way point between the tip and toe piece being super stiff and then a bit softer from that point to the tip for float would prove to be optimal for hairy situations.

    Just my .02

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ???
    Posts
    1,385
    Interested to see what becomes of the Big Bros this summer. Yeah I am only 5'9" and 155#. But I am still interested in long, stiff skis that haul ass. I will be patiently awaiting the feedback of how the Big Bros perform. This would be a very specialty ski for me but its something I want to add to my quiver.

    I got my tight trees and bumps ski in my 178 8800's. I got my all around do everything ski in my 186 LP's. Now I want a go big or go home ski and a pair of 200-205 pair of Bro's seem to fit that bill.

    If you build them, they will come.
    If you had a nickel for every nickel he has, you would have a lot of fuckin' nickels!

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    sandy, sl,ut
    Posts
    9,968
    Quote Originally Posted by justcuz
    I'd love to see a big bro at 195, swallow tail or twin, similar flex to softs. If they run $500 or $600 like the current bro, I'd even think about buying it. But it'd be last on my list after some 179's, and some sub 170's for my wife.
    Dood, I think you just described AK Rockets.
    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
    "We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats

    "I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso

    Cisco and his wife are fragile idiots who breed morons.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Adel-vague, Sth Oz
    Posts
    612
    bit late to chime in on this, but if we are looking at a NON-PRODUCTION, big killer ski as Idris intitially stated, then the 110 underfoot and 200+ length fits that bill. Not gonna personally argue too much over the details, as Unless I win the lottery, move to AK and buy a chopper with pilot, and thats the
    only skiing I do for the rest of my life, I'll never be rockstar, strong or heavy enough to need that ski. But as one offs, dreams, and limited runs go, this would be a pretty killer ski, although I wonder how many people would need it to be too much stiffer than the Squad in all seriousness.

    However, of we're talking the next production shape I'll be somewhat uncool and say something a bit skinnier. Not a conventional bump ski, but a maggot midfat. Something of a similar shape to say the Karma or the PR - high 80s to low 90s underfoot. A lot of peeps who ski in areas with firmer snow want something a bit quicker edge to edge, but generally have to get something soft like the PR, which isn't always grippy enough, or something too skinny for trips out west or on the odd pow day at home - like the 6 star.

    I reckon the bro, with all 3 flex options, in a 180 (+-5cms) length, but about 88mm underfoot, (and maybe with a bit more twin to it to goof on?) would be a more commercial option, whilst still being
    big enough for most here to consider and not feel undergunned on. Example, early/late season out west, maybe perfect one ski quiver out east, and with the weight benefits the layup provides, a serious contender
    for a near perfect spring/summer corn harvesting plank. Also, the shape looks fat enough for the more 'commercial' buyer - what they would consider as a fat ski, without being '2 snowboards'

    my $0.02...
    Riding bikes, but not shredding pow...

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Upland, CA
    Posts
    5,617
    Goddammit, give me something that I can't just go out and buy in a store. Keep in mind that I already have a 137-108-128mm ski...2 sets of them! Give Igneous a run for their money, make something that I'd have to pay even more extra for just to order it from them. Don't hold back!

    For you people wanting something 100 or 105-waisted in a 190, go buy that shit in ski shops because that shit is average and it's readily available. Stuff like we're talking here isn't. This Pussification of America will not stand! It is the death of us!!!

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    retired
    Posts
    12,456
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumper Bones
    This Pussification of America will not stand! It is the death of us!!!
    hear hear
    go for rob

    www.dpsskis.com

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by jonski
    However, of we're talking the next production shape I'll be somewhat uncool and say something a bit skinnier. Not a conventional bump ski, but a maggot midfat. Something of a similar shape to say the Karma or the PR - high 80s to low 90s underfoot. A lot of peeps who ski in areas with firmer snow want something a bit quicker edge to edge, but generally have to get something soft like the PR, which isn't always grippy enough, or something too skinny for trips out west or on the odd pow day at home - like the 6 star.

    I reckon the bro, with all 3 flex options, in a 180 (+-5cms) length, but about 88mm underfoot, (and maybe with a bit more twin to it to goof on?) would be a more commercial option, whilst still being
    big enough for most here to consider and not feel undergunned on. Example, early/late season out west, maybe perfect one ski quiver out east, and with the weight benefits the layup provides, a serious contender
    for a near perfect spring/summer corn harvesting plank. Also, the shape looks fat enough for the more 'commercial' buyer - what they would consider as a fat ski, without being '2 snowboards'

    my $0.02...
    Ooh if PMGear had made that kind of ski for the regular price of Bros I would've jumped on them right away.

    That said, PMGear is catering to a certainly niche market, and as such, making a ski like this would open up that niche significantly. Whether they want to do that or not depends on them. The bigger Bro would help extend the niche in the opposite direction. In a perfect world, PMGear would make Small Bro, Bro, and Big Bro so that almost everyone's wishes could be fulfilled, pretty much.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Whistler
    Posts
    1,013
    I'm all about a super stiff, nice and long, fat ( like 115) ski for charging. As has been said, a pintail would be killer and a rockered tip too. But please, please, make em in TWO sizes. I mean, I know I'ma strong skier and I love stiff skis (ex-racer, yada yada) but at 5'7" and 165lbs, a true 205 is just too long. So please hook up us vertically challenged charging mags by making this new Bro available in like a 193-5 and a 205, same dimensions, same flex, etc, just like a midget charging ski. Thanks from the little people...
    Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Powder

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Near Perimetr.
    Posts
    3,857
    Quote Originally Posted by rugbydave
    But please, please, make em in TWO sizes. I mean, I know I'ma strong skier and I love stiff skis (ex-racer, yada yada) but at 5'7" and 165lbs, a true 205 is just too long.

    As Idris stated in the first post, THE SKI IS A FRIGGIN PROTO!
    It will be a limited edition SHOWCASE.


    So stop asking for a fucking watered down pussyfication of it. Let PMGear have a biggest marketing tool of the ski-industry outside the skijumping and get some weight,dude.



    i am about the same size as you,so i dont even fantasize about the sticks..ehm..well..i do..but you get the point.




    Shivering in anticipation.

    The floggings will continue until morale improves.

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    Quote Originally Posted by Jumper Bones
    Goddammit, give me something that I can't just go out and buy in a store. Keep in mind that I already have a 137-108-128mm ski...2 sets of them! Give Igneous a run for their money, make something that I'd have to pay even more extra for just to order it from them. Don't hold back!

    For you people wanting something 100 or 105-waisted in a 190, go buy that shit in ski shops because that shit is average and it's readily available. Stuff like we're talking here isn't. This Pussification of America will not stand! It is the death of us!!!
    WELL PUT!!! If i want 190 gotamas i'll go out and buy some, but I want something badass, huge, burly and preferably with "gaper-killer" written somewhere on it. Seriously, the industry need some skis that are stiff and long, a ski that makes the legend pro xxl look like a rental ski, we need skis that will make people step up, we need a true big bro...
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    3,519
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier
    WELL PUT!!! If i want 190 gotamas i'll go out and buy some, but I want something badass, huge, burly and preferably with "gaper-killer" written somewhere on it. Seriously, the industry need some skis that are stiff and long, a ski that makes the legend pro xxl look like a rental ski, we need skis that will make people step up, we need a true big bro...
    says the guy who is 5-10 and 140lbs.

  13. #113
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Creative and ingenius suggestions specific to size, dimensions, radius, amount of rocker, and stiffness (fore and aft) that could be formulated into a poll and voted on? Once we feel like we have something that has enough appeal to work for a good number of skiers here, it makes it easier to hone in on a design. Maybe a template for opinions would be cool.

  14. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,488
    Quote Originally Posted by splat
    Creative and ingenius suggestions specific to size, dimensions, radius, amount of rocker, and stiffness (fore and aft) that could be formulated into a poll and voted on? Once we feel like we have something that has enough appeal to work for a good number of skiers here, it makes it easier to hone in on a design. Maybe a template for opinions would be cool.
    For the record, this is really cool to see. I can't wait to see what kind of prototypes come out in the end, whatever beasts they may be

  15. #115
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    sandy, sl,ut
    Posts
    9,968
    [QUOTE=soul_skier]...preferably with "gaper-killer" written somewhere on it. [QUOTE]

    Best idea in this thread. The graphics should have bloody starter jackets or somethign else mothers would shield thier childrens eyes from.
    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ________________
    "We don't need predator control, we need whiner control. Anyone who complains that "the gummint oughta do sumpin" about the wolves and coyotes should be darted, caged, and released in a more suitable habitat for them, like the middle of Manhattan." - Spats

    "I'm constantly doing things I can't do. Thats how I get to do them." - Pablo Picasso

    Cisco and his wife are fragile idiots who breed morons.

  16. #116
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    3,519
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier
    and preferably with "gaper-killer" written somewhere on it.
    and put FKNA on the bases

  17. #117
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,488
    Quote Originally Posted by mc_roon
    and put FKNA on the bases
    This is an idea someone suggested for, I think, the first run of Bros. It so should never have been scrapped!

  18. #118
    Squatch Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromond
    This is an idea someone suggested for, I think, the first run of Bros. It so should never have been scrapped!
    I think it was because it was way too expensive for a smalll run of skis.

  19. #119
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Squatch
    I think it was because it was way too expensive for a smalll run of skis.
    Yeah, lasercutting peices of base material can't be cheap.


    ...but really, how awesome would that be?

  20. #120
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    YetiMan
    Posts
    13,371
    wi der!

    wi der!

    wi der!

    everybody now....

    wi der!

    wi der!

    wi der!

    and the crowd goes wild .....aahhahhahahhhhh!!


  21. #121
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    33,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromond
    For the record, this is really cool to see. I can't wait to see what kind of prototypes come out in the end, whatever beasts they may be
    We'd like to do a few different sidecuts to take south and test. I might be wishin in one hand and shittin in the other, but wtf, I want to do it. But we need to get some base profiles in CAD to send to the base cutters with the rest of our orders, and if there's one thing I've learned in this business it's that summer goes by really fast.

    btw- Slim - would you pm me? I need some help with some CAD files.

  22. #122
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    any chance you could do an alternate run of the same big bro, whatever the dimensions happen to be, but with different, less G rated graphics, I'm thinking a black or dark red topsheet base color, with a birdos puder luder style porn star image on top up by the tips, with "gaper killer" written on the tails...PLEASE!

    Last edited by soul_skier; 06-19-2006 at 12:37 AM.
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  23. #123
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    ???
    Posts
    1,385
    Bro Model with "gaper killer" written below, FKNA on the bases and devil finger smiley on the tips. Make the top sheet black. Or just some NSFW brunnette should be the graphic for this long, stiff and fat ski. How fitting?

    edit: Soul Skier beat me to it on the black topsheet and the porn.
    Last edited by GheePup; 06-18-2006 at 09:08 PM.
    If you had a nickel for every nickel he has, you would have a lot of fuckin' nickels!

  24. #124
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,628
    Quote Originally Posted by leroy jenkins
    The graphics should have bloody starter jackets....
    alright, I gotta admit I laughed at that one.
    Waste your time, read my crap, at:
    One Gear, Two Planks

  25. #125
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,070
    I wanna see somewhere on the top sheet a spinal tap reference "but these go to eleven." The Big Bro's give you that extra push over the cliff.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •