AIRSTRIKE KILLS AL-ZARQAWI

[mr_gyptian]

what that story does is provide yet another concrete example of this administration's shamefulness, to play politics with our solider's lives, to manipulate the public's fear, all in support of their larger geo-political goals that are more tied to corporate interests vs. spreading "freedom" and "democracy" as they claim.

oh, here I thought the article said that Zarqawi, an Al Qaeda operative, was operating chemical weapon manufacturing facilities with in Iraq's borders to be used on targets outside of Iraq borders.

See I thought you guys said Iraq and Al Qaeda had nothing to do with each other. That there were were no chemical weapons manufacturing facilities in Iraq before we invaded. That "Bush lied about both and people died".

which is it?

by the way, atleast credit democratic underground if you're going to steal their stuff.

[freshies]

please don't lump me in with "you guys" - i think for myself and don't blindly follow one party or philosophy, regardless of how inept they appear to be. sure, i lean to the left, but I would be just as vocal had a DEM President and his defense department known about this guy, had the chance to take him out, and held off on doing so to further their bogus claims needed to invade Iraq. Becuase of that, lots of people were killed and the insurgency has gained a momentum that can't be turned back at this late date.

I was critical of Clinton for not pulling the trigger on Osama when he had the chance. But what this administration has done is much more evil.

[Tippster]

I was critical of Clinton for not pulling the trigger on Osama when he had the chance. But what this administration has done is much more evil.

Remember the whole "cruise missles shot at two sovereign Nations in Violation of just about all International Treaties that we are signatories to" thing? That was by Bubba, and aimed at Osama. Clinton nearly got tarred and feathered for that one by the "New Republicans."

Put the gameboy down and stop rewriting history with the revisionist Republican idiots.

[Ripzalot]

Remember the whole "cruise missles shot at two sovereign Nations in Violation of just about all International Treaties that we are signatories to" thing? That was by Bubba, and aimed at Osama. Clinton nearly got tarred and feathered for that one by the "New Republicans."

Put the gameboy down and stop rewriting history with the revisionist Republican idiots.

umm, who's rewriting history?

Democrat and Republican politicians rallied behind the President. Newt Gingrich, the House Speaker, called it "the right thing to do". Mr Clinton telephoned Tony Blair and several congressional leaders before the strikes, among them Mr Gingrich and the Senate Republican leader Trent Lott.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...21/wemb21.html

[MassLiberal]

The point ,which you obviously missed, was that they're all murdering scum. But then you were probably too busy deciding on which name to call me since you're much too emotional to debate the facts in my post. Heaven forbid The U.S. have a small victory in what is going to be a long struggle against islamo-fascists who want us all dead. Yes---even their sympathizers and appeasers. Remember what Mr. Hitler did to Britain in '40 after he got his ass kissed by Chamberlain in '39? Same game. World domination. Only this time it's based on a fanatacism that's stuck in the 12th century. Good luck "reasoning" with that. The only way to stop em is on their own turf. Not ours. Attack and stop em in their tracks. IMHO. Kudos to the Coalition and Iraqi forces.

Your sophomoric arguments only serve to show just how far your head is up your ass. You might want to educate yourself on world history prior to making analogies between Zarqawi and Hitler, as it was Liberal interventionalists, and not conservative Isolationists who finally dealt with Hitler.

Also, the difference between state actors (Hitler) and products of ideologies (zarqawi) is profoundly different. But the point is moot, since the Iraq war has nothing to do with Al Queda. In reality, Zarqawi was a pretty small fry in this whole operation, blown up in importance by the Defense department in order to mislead the public into believing that this mis adventure was about defeating terrorism.

In actuality, this war was nothing but a roll of the dice in the world wide game of international politics. The Neoconservative architects of the Iraq policy wanted to reverse what they perceived as the decline of American power and influence abroad. A victory in Iraq, they thought, would greatly strenghthen their hand in dealing with other, emerging powers such as Korea, Iran and Venezuela. Unfortunately, they were so wedded to the notion of re-establishing american dominance internationally that they destroyed age old alliances and trashed America's ability to act unilaterally in the future.

Celebrate Zarqawi's death. One less terrorist mother fucker to deal with. It is only to bad that the administration rushed into this was without listening to the advise of its generals, hurting the "war on terror" that you so desperately believe in.

[Mott the Hoople]

Your sophomoric arguments only serve to show just how far your head is up your ass. You might want to educate yourself on world history prior to making analogies between Zarqawi and Hitler, as it was Liberal interventionalists, and not conservative Isolationists who finally dealt with Hitler.

Also, the difference between state actors (Hitler) and products of ideologies (zarqawi) is profoundly different. But the point is moot, since the Iraq war has nothing to do with Al Queda. In reality, Zarqawi was a pretty small fry in this whole operation, blown up in importance by the Defense department in order to mislead the public into believing that this mis adventure was about defeating terrorism.

In actuality, this war was nothing but a roll of the dice in the world wide game of international politics. The Neoconservative architects of the Iraq policy wanted to reverse what they perceived as the decline of American power and influence abroad. A victory in Iraq, they thought, would greatly strenghthen their hand in dealing with other, emerging powers such as Korea, Iran and Venezuela. Unfortunately, they were so wedded to the notion of re-establishing american dominance internationally that they destroyed age old alliances and trashed America's ability to act unilaterally in the future.

Celebrate Zarqawi's death. One less terrorist mother fucker to deal with. It is only to bad that the administration rushed into this was without listening to the advise of its generals, hurting the "war on terror" that you so desperately believe in.

You're quite good at quoting far left blogs. By the way, how is it possible to not be able to act unilaterally? Do you realize you make no sense or does it just feel so good to spout off and emote you don't care? Nice talking to you but now I'm bored with your paranoid rantings. Have a nice Summer.

[MassLiberal]

You're quite good at quoting far left blogs. By the way, how is it possible to not be able to act unilaterally? Do you realize you make no sense or does it just feel so good to spout off and emote you don't care? Nice talking to you but now I'm bored with your paranoid rantings. Have a nice Summer.

ad hominem ad hominem ad hominem. Use some fucking logic in your argument. You obviously spend a lot of time listening to rush and hannity, as all you can do attack without adding substance.

Unilaterally? Our strength on the worldwide stage has been weakened considerably.

[Tippster]

umm, who's rewriting history?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlConte...21/wemb21.html

You're right - I shouldn't have said anything about the Republicans...

Just an example:

http://secure.mediaresearch.org/news...9980907p1.html

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/thomas082598.html

[mr_gyptian]

You're right - I shouldn't have said anything about the Republicans...

Just an example:

http://secure.mediaresearch.org/news...9980907p1.html

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/thomas082598.html

Tipp, where in those links do the republicans object to Clinton's violation of international treaties? Additionally doesn't it say that Speaker Newt and his right hand man Burton supported Clinton's strikes? Not only that but if I recall they wanted more aggressive strikes. oddly they don't mention that asswipe Delay's objection to airstrikes of any kind on any nation.

[Blurred]

DELICIOUS!!!!

[Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo]

DELICIOUS!!!!

MMMMMMMMMMMM....... tacos. Damn you, I was enjoying reading this thread and now you got me thinking about lunch, which is still an hour away. The least you could do is post a TR about Keller and those damn skeeters.

[Dexter Rutecki]

Hoople, you're a complete idiot. I doubt ML went to any blog for what he wrote--it's common sense, logic, and historical fact. You may want to look into some of that, if you're capable.
But no doubt you'll stick to toeing the same, tired, partisan line that you have. Viva Bush-think (now there's an oxymoron).

[Tippster]

I just had one of these:



Mr. G: You're right, and that's why I thought I'd amended my statement. Clinton was derided by many on both sides of the Aisle here in the US (see the "Wag the Dog" article) and admittedly praised by others. He was also almost universally criticised internationally.

My point wasn't to point fingers at Newt, etc. although it certainly reads that way. It was to show that saying "Clinton did nothing" is categorically false.

[Blurred]

Hoople, you're a complete idiot. I
But no doubt you'll stick to toeing the same, tired, partisan line that you have. Viva Bush-think (now there's an oxymoron).

How ironical.

Tipp-that looks delicious as well.

[mr_gyptian]

Tipp, can you remove that pic as NSFMr_G?

Even pic's of onions make me want to throw up.

[freshies]

is that a philly cheese steak?? man, those tacos and that meat sandwich-thingy both look good...

[freshies]

Put the gameboy down and stop rewriting history with the revisionist Republican idiots.

have you read anything I wrote above? what would make you think I am some Gameboy playing, right wing idiot? You, sir, need to take the time to read my previous posts, and not just take one sentence out of conext and insult me.

[Tippster]

Since yes I HAD read your previous posts it was more of a poke than an insult. I'm sorry your skin is so thin.

[freshies]

Since yes I HAD read your previous posts it was more of a poke than an insult. I'm sorry your skin is so thin.

its' usually not, just feeling a little sensetive today....JK.

[smitchell333]

THIS JUST IN


Al-Zarqawi DOES get 70 Virgins when entering "paradise."




Of course Satan forgot to tell him they'd be MALE virgin diabolic bastard imps of satan with barbed cocks and razor tongues who would continuously rape him over and over though out all eternity, oh well tough luck.